Regulation by Government-Sponsored Reinsurance in Catastrophe Management

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Qihao He
{"title":"Regulation by Government-Sponsored Reinsurance in Catastrophe Management","authors":"Qihao He","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2796973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reinsurance offers coverage for primary insurers and is available to back them up. Insurers have an increasing demand for more financial capacity when underwriting catastrophic risks. With respect to catastrophic risks, reinsurance’s role takes several forms. Reinsurance can take a significant portion of the insured losses from primary insurers, diversify catastrophe risks globally, supply underwriting assistance, and regulate insurers’ behavior to promote risk mitigation. These roles often go beyond risk transfer and risk financing and expand to risk regulation to primary insurers. The former role has been discussed at length in the law and economics literature, but regulation by reinsurance has not been widely discussed and has even qualified as problematic. Government-sponsored reinsurance, which marries the merits of both the government and private reinsurance, has gained increasing attention in the law and economics literature, and these programs have increased substantially in practice. Many countries use government-sponsored reinsurance to address catastrophe risks, including France (Caisse Centrale de Reassurance), Australia (Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation), Japan (Japan Earthquake Reinsurance Co., Ltd.).This paper will mainly argue why government should adopt government-sponsored reinsurance and how to expand regulation by reinsurance to achieve optimal catastrophe risk management in China. The chapter begins by introducing basic principles of reinsurance. Next, the main regulatory techniques of reinsurance which offer primary insurers incentives to underwrite appropriately and mitigate risk are explored. Then, the reasons why the private reinsurance market cannot provide adequate coverage for catastrophe risks and the arguments for government-sponsored reinsurance are discussed. Next, several typical government-sponsored reinsurance programs are examined and compared, including programs in France (Caisse Centrale de Reassurance; CCR), Japan (Japanese Earthquake Reinsurance Scheme; JERS), and Turkey (Turkish Catastrophe Insurance Pool; TCIP), in which primary insurers are regulated by reinsurance. Finally, it is argued that China should adopt government-sponsored reinsurance to address catastrophe risks, and the possibility and feasibility of regulation by government-sponsored reinsurance in China is addressed.","PeriodicalId":29865,"journal":{"name":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2796973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinsurance offers coverage for primary insurers and is available to back them up. Insurers have an increasing demand for more financial capacity when underwriting catastrophic risks. With respect to catastrophic risks, reinsurance’s role takes several forms. Reinsurance can take a significant portion of the insured losses from primary insurers, diversify catastrophe risks globally, supply underwriting assistance, and regulate insurers’ behavior to promote risk mitigation. These roles often go beyond risk transfer and risk financing and expand to risk regulation to primary insurers. The former role has been discussed at length in the law and economics literature, but regulation by reinsurance has not been widely discussed and has even qualified as problematic. Government-sponsored reinsurance, which marries the merits of both the government and private reinsurance, has gained increasing attention in the law and economics literature, and these programs have increased substantially in practice. Many countries use government-sponsored reinsurance to address catastrophe risks, including France (Caisse Centrale de Reassurance), Australia (Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation), Japan (Japan Earthquake Reinsurance Co., Ltd.).This paper will mainly argue why government should adopt government-sponsored reinsurance and how to expand regulation by reinsurance to achieve optimal catastrophe risk management in China. The chapter begins by introducing basic principles of reinsurance. Next, the main regulatory techniques of reinsurance which offer primary insurers incentives to underwrite appropriately and mitigate risk are explored. Then, the reasons why the private reinsurance market cannot provide adequate coverage for catastrophe risks and the arguments for government-sponsored reinsurance are discussed. Next, several typical government-sponsored reinsurance programs are examined and compared, including programs in France (Caisse Centrale de Reassurance; CCR), Japan (Japanese Earthquake Reinsurance Scheme; JERS), and Turkey (Turkish Catastrophe Insurance Pool; TCIP), in which primary insurers are regulated by reinsurance. Finally, it is argued that China should adopt government-sponsored reinsurance to address catastrophe risks, and the possibility and feasibility of regulation by government-sponsored reinsurance in China is addressed.
巨灾管理中政府赞助再保险的监管
再保险为主要保险公司提供保险,并为它们提供支持。在承保灾难性风险时,保险公司对更多财务能力的需求日益增加。就灾难性风险而言,再保险的作用有几种形式。再保险可以从原保险人那里承担很大一部分保险损失,分散全球巨灾风险,提供承保协助,并规范保险公司的行为以促进风险缓解。这些角色通常超越风险转移和风险融资,并扩展到对初级保险公司的风险监管。前一种作用已在法律和经济学文献中进行了详细讨论,但再保险监管尚未得到广泛讨论,甚至被认为存在问题。政府赞助的再保险结合了政府和私人再保险的优点,在法律和经济学文献中越来越受到关注,这些项目在实践中得到了实质性的增加。许多国家采用政府资助的再保险来应对巨灾风险,包括法国(Caisse Centrale de Reassurance)、澳大利亚(澳大利亚再保险公司)、日本(日本地震再保险公司)。本文将主要讨论政府为什么应该采用政府赞助的再保险,以及如何通过再保险扩大监管来实现中国最优的巨灾风险管理。本章首先介绍了再保险的基本原则。其次,本文探讨了再保险的主要监管技术,这些技术为原保险人提供了适当承保和降低风险的激励。然后,讨论了私营再保险市场无法提供足够的巨灾风险覆盖的原因以及政府赞助再保险的论点。接下来,对几个典型的政府资助的再保险项目进行了审查和比较,包括法国的项目(Caisse Centrale de Reassurance;日本(日本地震再保险计划);JERS)和土耳其(土耳其巨灾保险池;(TCIP),其中原保险公司受再保险监管。最后,本文认为中国应该采用政府赞助再保险来应对巨灾风险,并探讨了政府赞助再保险在中国监管的可能性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信