Libertination and Trustworthiness in Cicero's Correspondence

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
LATOMUS Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2143/LAT.79.2.3288657
Kristof Vermote
{"title":"Libertination and Trustworthiness in Cicero's Correspondence","authors":"Kristof Vermote","doi":"10.2143/LAT.79.2.3288657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides an original contribution to the ongoing debate on the social roles of Roman freedmen by examining the performativity of libertination – the explicit reference to an agent by the term libertus – in the epistolary networking of Cicero and his correspondents. Because many ex-slaves were counted among the elite’s most confidential personnel, the discursive use of libertination established a paratextual aura of trustworthiness that smoothed potentially delicate interactions. Contrary to previous studies that consider libertination mainly as a stratifying or even stigmatising label (accentuating an inferior legal status), this contribution suggests that it was, at least in epistolary discourse, a valuable asset readily resorted to by letter writers who were looking for ways to present their messages as reliable representations of their own thoughts and opinions.","PeriodicalId":44920,"journal":{"name":"LATOMUS","volume":"37 1","pages":"398-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LATOMUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/LAT.79.2.3288657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides an original contribution to the ongoing debate on the social roles of Roman freedmen by examining the performativity of libertination – the explicit reference to an agent by the term libertus – in the epistolary networking of Cicero and his correspondents. Because many ex-slaves were counted among the elite’s most confidential personnel, the discursive use of libertination established a paratextual aura of trustworthiness that smoothed potentially delicate interactions. Contrary to previous studies that consider libertination mainly as a stratifying or even stigmatising label (accentuating an inferior legal status), this contribution suggests that it was, at least in epistolary discourse, a valuable asset readily resorted to by letter writers who were looking for ways to present their messages as reliable representations of their own thoughts and opinions.
西塞罗书信中的解放与诚信
本文通过考察西塞罗和他的通讯员的书信网络中“自由”一词对代理人的明确提及,为正在进行的关于罗马自由民社会角色的辩论提供了原创贡献。由于许多前奴隶被视为精英阶层最机密的人员,解放的话语使用建立了一种可信赖的准文本氛围,从而缓和了潜在的微妙互动。与之前的研究相反,这些研究认为解放主要是一种分层甚至污名化的标签(强调低劣的法律地位),这一贡献表明,至少在书信体话语中,它是一种有价值的资产,对于那些寻找方法将他们的信息作为他们自己思想和观点的可靠代表的写信人来说,这是一种很容易利用的资产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LATOMUS
LATOMUS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: La Revue "Latomus", fondée en 1937 par Marc-Antoine KUGENER, Léon HERRMANN et Marcel RENARD, est actuellement publiée sous la direction de Carl DEROUX, avec l"aide financière du Ministère de la Communauté Française (Direction générale de l"enseignement non-obligatoire et de la recherche scientifique) ainsi que de la Fondation Universitaire de Belgique. La Revue paraît quatre fois par an; elle forme annuellement un tome de 1.000 pages environ. Elle publie des articles, des variétés et discussions, des notes de lecture, des comptes rendus, des notices bibliographiques et des informations pédagogiques, contenant une riche documentation, souvent inédite et abondamment illustrée.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信