The reduction of working time: definitions and measurement methods

IF 3.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bence Lukács, M. Antal
{"title":"The reduction of working time: definitions and measurement methods","authors":"Bence Lukács, M. Antal","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2022.2111921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Working time reduction (WTR) is a promising policy to enhance well-being in rich countries and an important topic in discourses on a new social vision. Numerous small-scale WTR trials are either underway or planned in various contexts. Properly measuring changes in working time is necessary to evaluate these trials, but challenges abound. Traditional definitions and measurement methods may not work for fragmented, creative, and location-independent jobs. The primary aim of this article is to review relevant work-time definitions and data-collection methods, discuss their complexities, and summarize the implications for WTR research. We reviewed 243 articles and categorize indicators currently used in the literature by relying on 45 methodological studies to identify the main challenges and potential solutions. We conclude that the most dominant definitions and methods, notably usual weekly hours measured by worker surveys, are losing relevance and credibility in many contexts. With the rise of indicators focused on actual hours and measured by time diaries, work grids, interviews, automatic measurements, and time-sampling, we foresee the emergence of non-comparable, job-specific work-time indicators. We propose a new time-sampling approach to deal with some of the least measurable jobs.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2111921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Working time reduction (WTR) is a promising policy to enhance well-being in rich countries and an important topic in discourses on a new social vision. Numerous small-scale WTR trials are either underway or planned in various contexts. Properly measuring changes in working time is necessary to evaluate these trials, but challenges abound. Traditional definitions and measurement methods may not work for fragmented, creative, and location-independent jobs. The primary aim of this article is to review relevant work-time definitions and data-collection methods, discuss their complexities, and summarize the implications for WTR research. We reviewed 243 articles and categorize indicators currently used in the literature by relying on 45 methodological studies to identify the main challenges and potential solutions. We conclude that the most dominant definitions and methods, notably usual weekly hours measured by worker surveys, are losing relevance and credibility in many contexts. With the rise of indicators focused on actual hours and measured by time diaries, work grids, interviews, automatic measurements, and time-sampling, we foresee the emergence of non-comparable, job-specific work-time indicators. We propose a new time-sampling approach to deal with some of the least measurable jobs.
减少工作时间:定义和测量方法
减少工作时间是富裕国家提高福利水平的一项有前景的政策,也是新社会愿景话语中的一个重要话题。在各种情况下,正在进行或计划进行许多小规模WTR试验。正确测量工作时间的变化是评估这些试验的必要条件,但挑战重重。传统的定义和测量方法可能不适用于分散的、创造性的和与地点无关的工作。本文的主要目的是回顾相关的工作时间定义和数据收集方法,讨论其复杂性,并总结WTR研究的意义。我们回顾了243篇文章,并根据45项方法学研究对文献中目前使用的指标进行了分类,以确定主要挑战和潜在解决方案。我们得出的结论是,最主要的定义和方法,特别是通过工人调查衡量的通常每周工作时间,在许多情况下正在失去相关性和可信度。随着以实际工时为重点的指标的兴起,并通过时间日记、工作网格、访谈、自动测量和时间抽样来衡量,我们预见到不可比较的、特定于工作的工作时间指标的出现。我们提出了一种新的时间采样方法来处理一些最不可测量的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy
Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy is a refereed, open-access journal which recognizes that climate change and other socio-environmental challenges require significant transformation of existing systems of consumption and production. Complex and diverse arrays of societal factors and institutions will in coming decades need to reconfigure agro-food systems, implement renewable energy sources, and reinvent housing, modes of mobility, and lifestyles for the current century and beyond. These innovations will need to be formulated in ways that enhance global equity, reduce unequal access to resources, and enable all people on the planet to lead flourishing lives within biophysical constraints. The journal seeks to advance scientific and political perspectives and to cultivate transdisciplinary discussions involving researchers, policy makers, civic entrepreneurs, and others. The ultimate objective is to encourage the design and deployment of both local experiments and system innovations that contribute to a more sustainable future by empowering individuals and organizations and facilitating processes of social learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信