Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia who are Active Intravenous Drug Users

V. Salunkhe, P. Peyrani, Leslie A Beavin, S. Furmanek, J. Ramirez
{"title":"Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with\n Community-Acquired Pneumonia who are Active Intravenous Drug Users","authors":"V. Salunkhe, P. Peyrani, Leslie A Beavin, S. Furmanek, J. Ramirez","doi":"10.18297/JRI/VOL2/ISS2/3/","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intravenous drug users (IVDU) have a 10-fold increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) compared to the general population. There is scarce data available evaluating the clinical outcomes of IVDU hospitalized patients with CAP and that data mostly focuses on mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, incidence and outcomes of hospitalized patients with CAP in active intravenous drug users in Louisville, Kentucky. Methods: This was a secondary data analysis of the University of Louisville Pneumonia study. IVDU patients were propensity score matched to a non-IVDU group. Study outcomes were time to clinical stability (TCS), length of stay (LOS), mortality at discharge, and mortality at 1 year. Stratified Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to evaluate TCS and LOS. Conditional logistic regression was performed to evaluate mortality. Statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. Results: From a total of 8,284 hospitalized patients with CAP reviewed, 113 patients were matched per group. Median (IQR) age for the IVDU was 33 (28-43) versus 36 (28-48) for the matched nonIVDU group (p<0.001). Analysis showed no association with TCS (stratified hazard ratio (sHR): 0.81; 95% CI: 0.58-1.14; p=0.227), LOS (sHR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.50-1.01; p=0.053), mortality at discharge (conditional odds ratio (cOR): 1.67; 95% CI: 0.40-6.97; p=0.484) and mortality at 1 year (cOR: 1.125; 95% CI: 0.43-2.92; p=0.808). Conclusions: This study shows that active IVDU hospitalized patients with CAP do not have worse outcomes when compared with non-IVDU hospitalized patients with CAP. Patients in the IVDU group were significantly younger. Since severity scores commonly used are heavily influenced by age, these will not likely be useful tools to assist the physicians with the site for care and management. DOI: 10.18297/jri/vol2/iss2/3 Received Date: February 22, 2018 Accepted Date: July 24, 2018 Website: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/jri Copyright: ©2018 the author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Affiliations: 1University of Louisville Division of Infectious Diseases, Louisville, KY 40202 2Pfizer, Inc., Collegeville, PA *Correspondence To: Vidyulata Salunkhe Work Address: University of Louisville, Division of Infectious Diseases 501 E. Broadway, Louisville, KY 40202 Work Email: vidyulata.salunkhe@louisville.edu 7 ULJRI Vol 2, (2) 2018 ORIGINAL RESEARCH population-based cohort study of all hospitalized adults with CAP who were residents in the city of Louisville, Kentucky, from June 1st, 2014 to May 31st, 2016 [13]. Inclusion Criteria Diagnosis of CAP required the presence of criterion A, B, and C: A. New pulmonary infiltrate on imaging (CT scan or chest x-ray) at the time of admission to the hospital. B. Signs and Symptoms of CAP (at least one of the following): • New or increased cough • Fever >37.8°C (100.0°F) or hypothermia <35.6°C (96.0°F) • Changes in WBC (leukocytosis >11,000 cells/mm3, left shift > 10% band forms/microliter, or leukopenia < 4,000 cells/mm3 C. Working diagnosis of CAP at the time of hospital admission with antimicrobial therapy given within 24 hours of admission. Study Groups Cases (group 1): Hospitalized patients with CAP with active IVDU documented in the medical record. Controls (group 2): Hospitalized adults with CAP who did not have documentation of actively using intravenous drugs. IVDU cases were matched 1:1 to control cases by age, race, and history of obesity (body mass index >30), current smoker, active alcohol use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, diabetes mellitus, HIV, renal disease, and liver disease. Study Variables • Patients’ characteristics: demographics, medical and social history, physical, and laboratory findings were collected if documented in the medical records. • Severity of disease: assessed by the following variables – acute altered mental status on admission, need of intensive care, ventilatory support, or vasopressor on the day of admission, pneumonia severity index risk class IV or V. • Complications: defined as the presence of persistent bacteremia and/or endocarditis. Study Outcomes • Time to clinical stability (TCS): A patient was defined as clinically stable the day that the following four criteria were met: 1. Improvement in cough and shortness of breath 2. Lack of fever for at least 8 hours 3. Improving leukocytosis (decreased at least 10% from the previous day) 4. Tolerating oral intake with adequate gastrointestinal absorption Patients were evaluated daily within the first 7 days of hospitalization to determine the day when clinical stability was reached. • Length of hospital stay (LOS): defined in days and calculated for each patient as the day of discharge minus the day of admission. Patients hospitalized for >14 days and patients who died prior to 14 days were censored at 14 days. • Mortality: defined as death by any cause 1) during hospitalization and 2) at one year after discharge. 8 ULJRI Vol 2, (2) 2018 Table 1 Patients’ characteristics for both study groups Variable IV Drug Users Non IV Drug Users Pvalue Total Population n=113 n=113","PeriodicalId":91979,"journal":{"name":"The University of Louisville journal of respiratory infections","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Louisville journal of respiratory infections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18297/JRI/VOL2/ISS2/3/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intravenous drug users (IVDU) have a 10-fold increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) compared to the general population. There is scarce data available evaluating the clinical outcomes of IVDU hospitalized patients with CAP and that data mostly focuses on mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, incidence and outcomes of hospitalized patients with CAP in active intravenous drug users in Louisville, Kentucky. Methods: This was a secondary data analysis of the University of Louisville Pneumonia study. IVDU patients were propensity score matched to a non-IVDU group. Study outcomes were time to clinical stability (TCS), length of stay (LOS), mortality at discharge, and mortality at 1 year. Stratified Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to evaluate TCS and LOS. Conditional logistic regression was performed to evaluate mortality. Statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. Results: From a total of 8,284 hospitalized patients with CAP reviewed, 113 patients were matched per group. Median (IQR) age for the IVDU was 33 (28-43) versus 36 (28-48) for the matched nonIVDU group (p<0.001). Analysis showed no association with TCS (stratified hazard ratio (sHR): 0.81; 95% CI: 0.58-1.14; p=0.227), LOS (sHR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.50-1.01; p=0.053), mortality at discharge (conditional odds ratio (cOR): 1.67; 95% CI: 0.40-6.97; p=0.484) and mortality at 1 year (cOR: 1.125; 95% CI: 0.43-2.92; p=0.808). Conclusions: This study shows that active IVDU hospitalized patients with CAP do not have worse outcomes when compared with non-IVDU hospitalized patients with CAP. Patients in the IVDU group were significantly younger. Since severity scores commonly used are heavily influenced by age, these will not likely be useful tools to assist the physicians with the site for care and management. DOI: 10.18297/jri/vol2/iss2/3 Received Date: February 22, 2018 Accepted Date: July 24, 2018 Website: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/jri Copyright: ©2018 the author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Affiliations: 1University of Louisville Division of Infectious Diseases, Louisville, KY 40202 2Pfizer, Inc., Collegeville, PA *Correspondence To: Vidyulata Salunkhe Work Address: University of Louisville, Division of Infectious Diseases 501 E. Broadway, Louisville, KY 40202 Work Email: vidyulata.salunkhe@louisville.edu 7 ULJRI Vol 2, (2) 2018 ORIGINAL RESEARCH population-based cohort study of all hospitalized adults with CAP who were residents in the city of Louisville, Kentucky, from June 1st, 2014 to May 31st, 2016 [13]. Inclusion Criteria Diagnosis of CAP required the presence of criterion A, B, and C: A. New pulmonary infiltrate on imaging (CT scan or chest x-ray) at the time of admission to the hospital. B. Signs and Symptoms of CAP (at least one of the following): • New or increased cough • Fever >37.8°C (100.0°F) or hypothermia <35.6°C (96.0°F) • Changes in WBC (leukocytosis >11,000 cells/mm3, left shift > 10% band forms/microliter, or leukopenia < 4,000 cells/mm3 C. Working diagnosis of CAP at the time of hospital admission with antimicrobial therapy given within 24 hours of admission. Study Groups Cases (group 1): Hospitalized patients with CAP with active IVDU documented in the medical record. Controls (group 2): Hospitalized adults with CAP who did not have documentation of actively using intravenous drugs. IVDU cases were matched 1:1 to control cases by age, race, and history of obesity (body mass index >30), current smoker, active alcohol use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, diabetes mellitus, HIV, renal disease, and liver disease. Study Variables • Patients’ characteristics: demographics, medical and social history, physical, and laboratory findings were collected if documented in the medical records. • Severity of disease: assessed by the following variables – acute altered mental status on admission, need of intensive care, ventilatory support, or vasopressor on the day of admission, pneumonia severity index risk class IV or V. • Complications: defined as the presence of persistent bacteremia and/or endocarditis. Study Outcomes • Time to clinical stability (TCS): A patient was defined as clinically stable the day that the following four criteria were met: 1. Improvement in cough and shortness of breath 2. Lack of fever for at least 8 hours 3. Improving leukocytosis (decreased at least 10% from the previous day) 4. Tolerating oral intake with adequate gastrointestinal absorption Patients were evaluated daily within the first 7 days of hospitalization to determine the day when clinical stability was reached. • Length of hospital stay (LOS): defined in days and calculated for each patient as the day of discharge minus the day of admission. Patients hospitalized for >14 days and patients who died prior to 14 days were censored at 14 days. • Mortality: defined as death by any cause 1) during hospitalization and 2) at one year after discharge. 8 ULJRI Vol 2, (2) 2018 Table 1 Patients’ characteristics for both study groups Variable IV Drug Users Non IV Drug Users Pvalue Total Population n=113 n=113
活跃静脉吸毒者社区获得性肺炎住院患者的特点和临床结局
背景:静脉吸毒者(IVDU)与普通人群相比,社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的风险增加了10倍。评估IVDU住院CAP患者的临床结果的数据很少,这些数据主要集中在死亡率上。本研究的目的是评估肯塔基州路易斯维尔活跃静脉吸毒者CAP住院患者的临床特征、发病率和预后。方法:这是路易斯维尔大学肺炎研究的二级数据分析。IVDU患者倾向评分与非IVDU组相匹配。研究结果包括临床稳定时间(TCS)、住院时间(LOS)、出院死亡率和1年死亡率。采用分层Cox比例风险回归评价TCS和LOS。采用条件逻辑回归评估死亡率。统计学意义定义为p≤0.05。结果:在8284例CAP住院患者中,每组匹配113例患者。IVDU患者的中位(IQR)年龄为33岁(28-43岁),而匹配的非IVDU组的中位(IQR)年龄为36岁(28-48岁)(p37.8°C(100.0°F)或低温11,000个细胞/mm3,左移> 10%带型/微升,或白细胞减少< 4,000个细胞/mm3)。入院时CAP的有效诊断并在入院24小时内给予抗菌治疗。病例(第一组):医疗记录中有活动性IVDU的CAP住院患者。对照组(第二组):住院的成人CAP患者,没有积极静脉注射药物的记录。IVDU病例按年龄、种族、肥胖史(体重指数>30)、吸烟史、积极饮酒史、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、充血性心力衰竭、中风、糖尿病、艾滋病、肾病和肝病与对照病例1:1匹配。•患者特征:人口统计学、病史和社会史、体格和实验室检查结果被收集,如果记录在医疗记录中。•疾病严重程度:通过以下变量进行评估——入院时的急性精神状态改变、入院当天是否需要重症监护、呼吸支持或血管加压药物、肺炎严重程度指数风险等级IV或v。•并发症:定义为持续菌血症和/或心内膜炎的存在。•临床稳定时间(TCS):患者在满足以下四个标准的当天被定义为临床稳定。改善咳嗽和呼吸短促。至少8小时不发烧。白细胞增多(比前一天减少至少10%)患者在住院前7天内每天进行评估,以确定达到临床稳定的日期。•住院时间(LOS):以天为单位定义,并为每位患者计算出院日减去入院日。住院14天以上的患者和14天前死亡的患者在14天内被审查。•死亡率:定义为1)住院期间和2)出院后一年内任何原因造成的死亡。表1两组患者特征变量静脉吸毒者非静脉吸毒者p值总人口n=113 n=113
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信