Survival analysis for user disengagement prediction: question-and-answering communities' case

H. A. Firouzjaei
{"title":"Survival analysis for user disengagement prediction: question-and-answering communities' case","authors":"H. A. Firouzjaei","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2203.15255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We used survival analysis to model user disengagement in three distinct questions-and-answering communities in this work. We used the complete historical data of {Politics, Data Science, Computer Science} Stack Exchange communities from their inception until May 2021, which include the information about all users who were members of one of these three communities. Furthermore, formulating the user disengagement prediction as a survival analysis task, we utilised two survival analysis techniques to model and predict the probabilities of members of each community becoming disengaged. Our main finding is that the likelihood of users with even a few contributions staying active is noticeably higher than the users who were making no contributions; this distinction may widen as time passes. Moreover, the results of our experiments indicate that users with more favourable views towards the content shared on the platform may stay engaged longer. Finally, the observed pattern holds for all three communities, regardless of their themes.","PeriodicalId":74521,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining. International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining","volume":"28 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining. International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.15255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We used survival analysis to model user disengagement in three distinct questions-and-answering communities in this work. We used the complete historical data of {Politics, Data Science, Computer Science} Stack Exchange communities from their inception until May 2021, which include the information about all users who were members of one of these three communities. Furthermore, formulating the user disengagement prediction as a survival analysis task, we utilised two survival analysis techniques to model and predict the probabilities of members of each community becoming disengaged. Our main finding is that the likelihood of users with even a few contributions staying active is noticeably higher than the users who were making no contributions; this distinction may widen as time passes. Moreover, the results of our experiments indicate that users with more favourable views towards the content shared on the platform may stay engaged longer. Finally, the observed pattern holds for all three communities, regardless of their themes.
用户脱离预测的生存分析:问答社区案例
在这项工作中,我们使用生存分析来模拟三个不同的问答社区的用户脱离。我们使用了{政治,数据科学,计算机科学}Stack Exchange社区从成立到2021年5月的完整历史数据,其中包括这三个社区之一的所有用户的信息。此外,将用户脱离预测作为生存分析任务,我们利用两种生存分析技术来建模和预测每个社区成员脱离的概率。我们的主要发现是,即使有少量贡献的用户保持活跃的可能性也明显高于没有贡献的用户;随着时间的推移,这种区别可能会扩大。此外,我们的实验结果表明,对平台上分享的内容持更有利观点的用户可能会保持更长的时间。最后,观察到的模式适用于所有三个社区,而不管它们的主题是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信