Apnoeic Oxygenation during Simulated Difficult Intubation in Obese Patients: Comparison of Buccal Ring, Adair and Elwyn Tube Versus Nasal Cannula: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

R. Mohanty, L. George, S. George, M. Babu
{"title":"Apnoeic Oxygenation during Simulated Difficult Intubation in Obese Patients: Comparison of Buccal Ring, Adair and Elwyn Tube Versus Nasal Cannula: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"R. Mohanty, L. George, S. George, M. Babu","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_114_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Apnoeic oxygenation is an established method of increasing safe apnoea times during intubation and this is of more importance in obese patients. The usefulness of buccal Ring, Adair and Elwyn (RAE) oxygenation has been established in previous studies, however a head-to-head comparison with nasal cannula (NC) is lacking. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare apnoea time with buccal RAE (BR) versus NC in obese patients. Setting and Design: This was a prospective, nonblinded randomized controlled trial conducted in a tertiary hospital where fifty American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Class I and II, obese patients with body mass index ≥30, posted for elective surgery were included. Materials and Methods: Following adequate preoxygenation and standard induction of anaesthesia, a prolonged simulated difficult laryngoscopy was performed during which oxygen was provided via either BR or NC. The primary outcome was time to desaturation to <95% or 10 min, which ever occurred first. Other outcomes recorded were lowest saturation, time to resaturation and highest end tidal carbon di oxide. Statistical Analysis: Mean with standard deviation (SD) or median with inter quartile range were used for continuous variables and absolute number with percentage were used for categorical variables. The primary outcome was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and log-rank tests were applied. Results: Patient characteristics were similar in both arms. The mean apnoea time in seconds (SD) in the BR group, 375.3 (116.6) was higher than the NC group 316.1 (94.1), P = 0.054. From the Kapan Meier curves the probability of desaturating to <95% was earlier in the NC group than the BR group (P = 0.092). The other outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion: This is the first study that demonstrates that oxygenation via a BR is better than NC in providing apnoeic oxygenation in obese patients and can safely be used when NC are contraindicated.","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"15 1","pages":"408 - 412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_114_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Apnoeic oxygenation is an established method of increasing safe apnoea times during intubation and this is of more importance in obese patients. The usefulness of buccal Ring, Adair and Elwyn (RAE) oxygenation has been established in previous studies, however a head-to-head comparison with nasal cannula (NC) is lacking. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare apnoea time with buccal RAE (BR) versus NC in obese patients. Setting and Design: This was a prospective, nonblinded randomized controlled trial conducted in a tertiary hospital where fifty American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Class I and II, obese patients with body mass index ≥30, posted for elective surgery were included. Materials and Methods: Following adequate preoxygenation and standard induction of anaesthesia, a prolonged simulated difficult laryngoscopy was performed during which oxygen was provided via either BR or NC. The primary outcome was time to desaturation to <95% or 10 min, which ever occurred first. Other outcomes recorded were lowest saturation, time to resaturation and highest end tidal carbon di oxide. Statistical Analysis: Mean with standard deviation (SD) or median with inter quartile range were used for continuous variables and absolute number with percentage were used for categorical variables. The primary outcome was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and log-rank tests were applied. Results: Patient characteristics were similar in both arms. The mean apnoea time in seconds (SD) in the BR group, 375.3 (116.6) was higher than the NC group 316.1 (94.1), P = 0.054. From the Kapan Meier curves the probability of desaturating to <95% was earlier in the NC group than the BR group (P = 0.092). The other outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion: This is the first study that demonstrates that oxygenation via a BR is better than NC in providing apnoeic oxygenation in obese patients and can safely be used when NC are contraindicated.
肥胖患者模拟困难插管时的呼吸性氧合:颊环、Adair和Elwyn管与鼻插管的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
背景:呼吸暂停氧合是增加插管期间安全呼吸暂停时间的既定方法,这在肥胖患者中更为重要。在以前的研究中已经证实了颊环、Adair和Elwyn (RAE)氧合的有效性,但是缺乏与鼻插管(NC)的头对头比较。目的:本研究的目的是比较肥胖患者呼吸暂停时间与口腔RAE (BR)和NC。背景和设计:这是一项前瞻性、非盲性随机对照试验,在一家三级医院进行,纳入50名美国麻醉医师协会身体状况等级为I和II、体重指数≥30的择期手术肥胖患者。材料和方法:在充分的预充氧和标准的麻醉诱导后,进行长时间的模拟困难喉镜检查,期间通过BR或NC提供氧气。主要转归是先发生的去饱和时间<95%或10分钟。记录的其他结果包括最低饱和度、再饱和时间和最高潮汐二氧化碳含量。统计分析:连续变量采用带标准差的平均值(SD)或带四分位数范围的中位数,分类变量采用带百分比的绝对值。主要结局采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线进行分析,并采用log-rank检验。结果:两组患者特征相似。BR组平均呼吸暂停时间(SD)为375.3(116.6),高于NC组316.1 (94.1),P = 0.054。从Kapan Meier曲线来看,NC组去饱和至<95%的概率比BR组早(P = 0.092)。两组的其他结果相似。结论:这是第一个研究表明,通过BR进行氧合比NC更好地为肥胖患者提供呼吸暂停氧合,并且在NC禁忌时可以安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信