Comparative study of flexural strength of temporary restorative resin according to surface polishing and fabrication methods

Jae-Hun Lim, Jae-In Lee
{"title":"Comparative study of flexural strength of temporary restorative resin according to surface polishing and fabrication methods","authors":"Jae-Hun Lim, Jae-In Lee","doi":"10.14368/JDRAS.2021.37.1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of surface polishing and fabrication method on the flexural strength of temporary restorative resin. Materials and Methods: Each of four fabrication methods was used to make 30 temporary restorative resin specimens and the specimens were divided into two groups depending on whether they were polished by mechanical polishing. Specimens were stored in 37°C thermostat for 24 hours. Flexural strength was measured using a universal testing machine (UTM). The data obtained through the experiment were analyzed with Two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test and Paired t-test. Results: CAD/CAM milling group showed the highest flexural strength regardless of surface polishing. In decreasing order, the flexural strength of the other fabrication method group was as follows SLA 3D printing, DLP 3D printing, and Conventional method group. Conclusion: Surface polishing did not affect flexural strength of the temporary restorative resin ( P > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences in flexural strength depending on fabrication method ( P < 0.05). (J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2021;37(1):16-22)","PeriodicalId":15594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14368/JDRAS.2021.37.1.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of surface polishing and fabrication method on the flexural strength of temporary restorative resin. Materials and Methods: Each of four fabrication methods was used to make 30 temporary restorative resin specimens and the specimens were divided into two groups depending on whether they were polished by mechanical polishing. Specimens were stored in 37°C thermostat for 24 hours. Flexural strength was measured using a universal testing machine (UTM). The data obtained through the experiment were analyzed with Two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test and Paired t-test. Results: CAD/CAM milling group showed the highest flexural strength regardless of surface polishing. In decreasing order, the flexural strength of the other fabrication method group was as follows SLA 3D printing, DLP 3D printing, and Conventional method group. Conclusion: Surface polishing did not affect flexural strength of the temporary restorative resin ( P > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences in flexural strength depending on fabrication method ( P < 0.05). (J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2021;37(1):16-22)
根据表面抛光和制造方法对临时修复树脂抗弯强度的比较研究
目的:研究表面抛光和制作方法对临时修复树脂抗弯强度的影响。材料与方法:采用四种制作方法各制作30个临时修复树脂标本,根据是否进行机械抛光将标本分为两组。标本在37℃恒温箱中保存24小时。弯曲强度测量采用万能试验机(UTM)。对实验所得数据进行双因素方差分析、Tukey’s HSD检验和配对t检验。结果:无论表面抛光与否,CAD/CAM铣削组的抗折强度最高。其他制造方法组的抗弯强度由大到小依次为SLA 3D打印组、DLP 3D打印组、常规方法组。结论:表面抛光对临时修复树脂的抗弯强度无影响(P > 0.05)。不同制作方法的抗折强度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。[J] .康复与应用科学,2021;37(1):16-22。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信