EXPERIENCE OF USING EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA IN ONCOSURGERY: A CLINICAL CASE

T. Sadykova, M. Kuzikeev, B. Sarsembaev, E. Orazbek
{"title":"EXPERIENCE OF USING EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA IN ONCOSURGERY: A CLINICAL CASE","authors":"T. Sadykova, M. Kuzikeev, B. Sarsembaev, E. Orazbek","doi":"10.52532/2663-4864-2022-1-63-47-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance: Surgical intervention is the most revolutionary method in the complex specific therapy of malignant neoplasms. Oncosurgical operations are among the most traumatic; the volume of surgical intervention depends on the stage of the tumor process and its \nprevalence, the presence of metastases, germination in neighboring tissues and organs, and concomitant diseases. Particular importance \nis attached to the anesthetic management of the perioperative period. \nRegional anesthesia is practically not used for several reasons in oncosurgical reconstructive and plastic interventions on the abdominal organs. First, the anesthetist’s qualification plays a role in choosing the anesthesia method, especially when performing high epidural \nanesthesia, which is technically challenging. The emergence of highly effective anesthetics and high-quality sets for epidural anesthesia \nhas significantly expanded the scope of this type of anesthesia in oncosurgery. \nThis study aimed to demonstrate the possibilities and advantages of epidural anesthesia in the perioperative period using the described \nclinical case as an example. \nMethods: Patient N. was admitted to the clinic for surgical treatment for a malignant neoplasm of the transverse colon without clinical \nsigns of obstruction of the lumen of the large intestine. She underwent laparotomy, subtotal colectomy with anastomosis, resection of the \nomentum, and lymph node dissection. Epidural anesthesia with catheterization of the epidural space and administration of ropivacaine and \nmorphine was used as an anesthetic aid. \nResults: Adequate pain relief, relaxation, the absence of clinically significant autonomic reactions in the intraoperative period, and \nadequate pain relief without narcotic analgesics in the postoperative period were achieved. The patient was activated on days 3-5 after \nsurgery. Subjectively, the patient emphasized the comfortable course of the perioperative period. \nConclusion: Thus, our experience of using regional (epidural) anesthesia in oncosurgery as an isolated method of anesthesia, subject \nto technically competent and accurate execution of the procedure, allows us to recommend it as a reasonable alternative or a component \nof generally accepted traditional general anesthesia to reduce the risk of anesthesia, adequate and effective anesthesia in the perioperative \nperiod and optimization of economic and logistical costs in the postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":19480,"journal":{"name":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52532/2663-4864-2022-1-63-47-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance: Surgical intervention is the most revolutionary method in the complex specific therapy of malignant neoplasms. Oncosurgical operations are among the most traumatic; the volume of surgical intervention depends on the stage of the tumor process and its prevalence, the presence of metastases, germination in neighboring tissues and organs, and concomitant diseases. Particular importance is attached to the anesthetic management of the perioperative period. Regional anesthesia is practically not used for several reasons in oncosurgical reconstructive and plastic interventions on the abdominal organs. First, the anesthetist’s qualification plays a role in choosing the anesthesia method, especially when performing high epidural anesthesia, which is technically challenging. The emergence of highly effective anesthetics and high-quality sets for epidural anesthesia has significantly expanded the scope of this type of anesthesia in oncosurgery. This study aimed to demonstrate the possibilities and advantages of epidural anesthesia in the perioperative period using the described clinical case as an example. Methods: Patient N. was admitted to the clinic for surgical treatment for a malignant neoplasm of the transverse colon without clinical signs of obstruction of the lumen of the large intestine. She underwent laparotomy, subtotal colectomy with anastomosis, resection of the omentum, and lymph node dissection. Epidural anesthesia with catheterization of the epidural space and administration of ropivacaine and morphine was used as an anesthetic aid. Results: Adequate pain relief, relaxation, the absence of clinically significant autonomic reactions in the intraoperative period, and adequate pain relief without narcotic analgesics in the postoperative period were achieved. The patient was activated on days 3-5 after surgery. Subjectively, the patient emphasized the comfortable course of the perioperative period. Conclusion: Thus, our experience of using regional (epidural) anesthesia in oncosurgery as an isolated method of anesthesia, subject to technically competent and accurate execution of the procedure, allows us to recommend it as a reasonable alternative or a component of generally accepted traditional general anesthesia to reduce the risk of anesthesia, adequate and effective anesthesia in the perioperative period and optimization of economic and logistical costs in the postoperative period.
硬膜外麻醉在肿瘤手术中的应用体会1例
相关性:手术介入是恶性肿瘤复杂特异性治疗中最具革命性的方法。肿瘤外科手术是创伤最大的手术之一;手术干预的数量取决于肿瘤进程的阶段及其流行程度、是否存在转移、是否在邻近组织和器官中萌发以及是否伴有疾病。围手术期的麻醉管理尤为重要。由于一些原因,区域麻醉在腹部器官的肿瘤外科重建和整形干预中实际上不被使用。首先,麻醉师的资格在麻醉方法的选择中起着重要作用,特别是在进行高硬膜外麻醉时,这在技术上具有挑战性。高效麻醉药和高质量硬膜外麻醉套装的出现,极大地扩大了硬膜外麻醉在肿瘤外科中的应用范围。本研究旨在以上述临床病例为例,说明硬膜外麻醉在围手术期的可能性和优势。方法:患者n因患横结肠恶性肿瘤,无大肠管腔梗阻的临床表现而入院接受手术治疗。她接受了剖腹手术、结肠次全切除术并吻合、大网膜切除术和淋巴结清扫。硬膜外麻醉采用硬膜外腔置管,给予罗哌卡因和吗啡作为麻醉辅助。结果:术中疼痛得到充分缓解,松弛,无临床明显的自主神经反应,术后无麻醉性镇痛,疼痛得到充分缓解。患者在术后3-5天被激活。患者主观上强调围手术期的舒适过程。结论:因此,我们在肿瘤手术中使用区域(硬膜外)麻醉作为一种孤立的麻醉方法的经验,在技术能力和操作准确的前提下,使我们能够推荐它作为普遍接受的传统全身麻醉的合理替代或组成部分,以降低麻醉风险,围手术期麻醉充分有效,术后经济和后勤成本优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信