T. Sadykova, M. Kuzikeev, B. Sarsembaev, E. Orazbek
{"title":"EXPERIENCE OF USING EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA IN ONCOSURGERY: A CLINICAL CASE","authors":"T. Sadykova, M. Kuzikeev, B. Sarsembaev, E. Orazbek","doi":"10.52532/2663-4864-2022-1-63-47-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance: Surgical intervention is the most revolutionary method in the complex specific therapy of malignant neoplasms. Oncosurgical operations are among the most traumatic; the volume of surgical intervention depends on the stage of the tumor process and its \nprevalence, the presence of metastases, germination in neighboring tissues and organs, and concomitant diseases. Particular importance \nis attached to the anesthetic management of the perioperative period. \nRegional anesthesia is practically not used for several reasons in oncosurgical reconstructive and plastic interventions on the abdominal organs. First, the anesthetist’s qualification plays a role in choosing the anesthesia method, especially when performing high epidural \nanesthesia, which is technically challenging. The emergence of highly effective anesthetics and high-quality sets for epidural anesthesia \nhas significantly expanded the scope of this type of anesthesia in oncosurgery. \nThis study aimed to demonstrate the possibilities and advantages of epidural anesthesia in the perioperative period using the described \nclinical case as an example. \nMethods: Patient N. was admitted to the clinic for surgical treatment for a malignant neoplasm of the transverse colon without clinical \nsigns of obstruction of the lumen of the large intestine. She underwent laparotomy, subtotal colectomy with anastomosis, resection of the \nomentum, and lymph node dissection. Epidural anesthesia with catheterization of the epidural space and administration of ropivacaine and \nmorphine was used as an anesthetic aid. \nResults: Adequate pain relief, relaxation, the absence of clinically significant autonomic reactions in the intraoperative period, and \nadequate pain relief without narcotic analgesics in the postoperative period were achieved. The patient was activated on days 3-5 after \nsurgery. Subjectively, the patient emphasized the comfortable course of the perioperative period. \nConclusion: Thus, our experience of using regional (epidural) anesthesia in oncosurgery as an isolated method of anesthesia, subject \nto technically competent and accurate execution of the procedure, allows us to recommend it as a reasonable alternative or a component \nof generally accepted traditional general anesthesia to reduce the risk of anesthesia, adequate and effective anesthesia in the perioperative \nperiod and optimization of economic and logistical costs in the postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":19480,"journal":{"name":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52532/2663-4864-2022-1-63-47-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Relevance: Surgical intervention is the most revolutionary method in the complex specific therapy of malignant neoplasms. Oncosurgical operations are among the most traumatic; the volume of surgical intervention depends on the stage of the tumor process and its
prevalence, the presence of metastases, germination in neighboring tissues and organs, and concomitant diseases. Particular importance
is attached to the anesthetic management of the perioperative period.
Regional anesthesia is practically not used for several reasons in oncosurgical reconstructive and plastic interventions on the abdominal organs. First, the anesthetist’s qualification plays a role in choosing the anesthesia method, especially when performing high epidural
anesthesia, which is technically challenging. The emergence of highly effective anesthetics and high-quality sets for epidural anesthesia
has significantly expanded the scope of this type of anesthesia in oncosurgery.
This study aimed to demonstrate the possibilities and advantages of epidural anesthesia in the perioperative period using the described
clinical case as an example.
Methods: Patient N. was admitted to the clinic for surgical treatment for a malignant neoplasm of the transverse colon without clinical
signs of obstruction of the lumen of the large intestine. She underwent laparotomy, subtotal colectomy with anastomosis, resection of the
omentum, and lymph node dissection. Epidural anesthesia with catheterization of the epidural space and administration of ropivacaine and
morphine was used as an anesthetic aid.
Results: Adequate pain relief, relaxation, the absence of clinically significant autonomic reactions in the intraoperative period, and
adequate pain relief without narcotic analgesics in the postoperative period were achieved. The patient was activated on days 3-5 after
surgery. Subjectively, the patient emphasized the comfortable course of the perioperative period.
Conclusion: Thus, our experience of using regional (epidural) anesthesia in oncosurgery as an isolated method of anesthesia, subject
to technically competent and accurate execution of the procedure, allows us to recommend it as a reasonable alternative or a component
of generally accepted traditional general anesthesia to reduce the risk of anesthesia, adequate and effective anesthesia in the perioperative
period and optimization of economic and logistical costs in the postoperative period.