Variations in Antioxidant Activity, Physical, Chemical and Selected Antinutritional Factors of Two Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan (L)) Varieties as Affected by Processing Methods

A. Ukom, Emmanuella Odoabuchi, P. Udofia, U. Ejinkeonye
{"title":"Variations in Antioxidant Activity, Physical, Chemical and Selected Antinutritional Factors of Two Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan (L)) Varieties as Affected by Processing Methods","authors":"A. Ukom, Emmanuella Odoabuchi, P. Udofia, U. Ejinkeonye","doi":"10.37256/fse.4120231920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the variations in antioxidant activity, physical, chemical and antinutritional properties of two pigeon pea varieties (white and brown) as affected by processing methods (boiling, roasting and sprouting). The processing methods revealed significant (p<0.05) variations in the results of tested parameters. The unprocessed white pigeon pea variety had the highest gelatinization temperature (84 °C), trypsin inhibitor (9.04 Tiu/ng), polyphenols (137.05 mgGAE/100 g) and ABTS (141.10 μmTrolox/g), while the unprocessed brown variety retained higher concentrations of bulk density (0.71 g/g), phytate (2.55%), tannin (0.94 mg/100 g), FRAP (7.86 mmol/100 g) and total flavonoid (1.02 mgQE/100 g) contents, respectively. Boiled white pigeon pea variety had the highest moisture (11.60%), fat (5.19%), oil absorption capacity (2.97 mg/ml), DPPH (103.25%), and magnesium (80.65 mg/100 g), whereas roasted white pigeon pea variety showed significantly (p<0.05) higher concentrations in water absorption capacity (2.25 g/ml), swelling index (3.51%), and wettability (59.70%). Roasted brown pigeon pea variety exhibited greater ash (5.04%), fiber (5.31%), protein (24.36%), and oil absorption capacity (2.97 mg/ml) than other treatments, respectively. On the other hand, the sprouted white pigeon pea variety had the highest carbohydrate (60.09%), calcium (124.00 mg/100 g) and iron (11.38 mg/100 g) content. From the variety and processing methods, the study shows that the white variety of pigeon pea was a good source of proximate, minerals and functional values, while the brown variety had the highest antinutrients and antioxidant activities. Hence, pigeon pea is a good source of nutrients and that differences in nutrient values are due to variety and processing treatments.","PeriodicalId":15835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science and Engineering","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37256/fse.4120231920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the variations in antioxidant activity, physical, chemical and antinutritional properties of two pigeon pea varieties (white and brown) as affected by processing methods (boiling, roasting and sprouting). The processing methods revealed significant (p<0.05) variations in the results of tested parameters. The unprocessed white pigeon pea variety had the highest gelatinization temperature (84 °C), trypsin inhibitor (9.04 Tiu/ng), polyphenols (137.05 mgGAE/100 g) and ABTS (141.10 μmTrolox/g), while the unprocessed brown variety retained higher concentrations of bulk density (0.71 g/g), phytate (2.55%), tannin (0.94 mg/100 g), FRAP (7.86 mmol/100 g) and total flavonoid (1.02 mgQE/100 g) contents, respectively. Boiled white pigeon pea variety had the highest moisture (11.60%), fat (5.19%), oil absorption capacity (2.97 mg/ml), DPPH (103.25%), and magnesium (80.65 mg/100 g), whereas roasted white pigeon pea variety showed significantly (p<0.05) higher concentrations in water absorption capacity (2.25 g/ml), swelling index (3.51%), and wettability (59.70%). Roasted brown pigeon pea variety exhibited greater ash (5.04%), fiber (5.31%), protein (24.36%), and oil absorption capacity (2.97 mg/ml) than other treatments, respectively. On the other hand, the sprouted white pigeon pea variety had the highest carbohydrate (60.09%), calcium (124.00 mg/100 g) and iron (11.38 mg/100 g) content. From the variety and processing methods, the study shows that the white variety of pigeon pea was a good source of proximate, minerals and functional values, while the brown variety had the highest antinutrients and antioxidant activities. Hence, pigeon pea is a good source of nutrients and that differences in nutrient values are due to variety and processing treatments.
不同加工方法对两个鸽豆品种抗氧化活性、理化性质及抗营养因子的影响
研究了不同加工方法(煮沸、烘烤和发芽)对白豌豆和褐豌豆抗氧化活性、理化性质和抗营养性能的影响。不同处理方法对测试参数的结果有显著差异(p<0.05)。白豌豆品种的糊化温度(84℃)、胰酶抑制剂(9.04 Tiu/ng)、多酚(137.05 mgGAE/100 g)和ABTS (141.10 μmTrolox/g)最高,棕豌豆品种的容重(0.71 g/g)、植酸(2.55%)、单宁(0.94 mg/100 g)、FRAP (7.86 mmol/100 g)和总黄酮(1.02 mgQE/100 g)含量较高。水煮白鸽豌豆水分含量(11.60%)、脂肪含量(5.19%)、吸油量(2.97 mg/ml)、DPPH含量(103.25%)和镁含量(80.65 mg/100 g)最高,而烤制白鸽豌豆吸水量(2.25 g/ml)、溶胀指数(3.51%)和润湿性(59.70%)显著高于水煮白鸽豌豆(p<0.05)。烤鸽豆品种的灰分(5.04%)、纤维(5.31%)、蛋白质(24.36%)和吸油量(2.97 mg/ml)均高于其他处理。发芽品种的碳水化合物(60.09%)、钙(124.00 mg/100 g)和铁(11.38 mg/100 g)含量最高。从品种和加工方法上研究表明,白色品种的鸽豆具有良好的比邻物、矿物质和功能价值,而棕色品种的鸽豆具有最高的抗营养成分和抗氧化活性。因此,鸽豆是一种很好的营养来源,其营养价值的差异是由于品种和加工处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信