The European framework for intellectual property rights for biological medicines

IF 0.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Josette Sciberras, R. Zammit, P. V. Bonanno
{"title":"The European framework for intellectual property rights for biological medicines","authors":"Josette Sciberras, R. Zammit, P. V. Bonanno","doi":"10.5639/gabij.2021.1004.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe (2020) proposes actions related to intellectual property (IP) rights as a means of ensuring patients’ access to medicines. This review aims to describe and discuss the European IP framework and its impact on accessibility of biological medicines and makes some recommendations. Methods: A non-systematic literature review on IP for biological medicines was conducted. Data on authorizations and patent and exclusivity expiry dates of biological medicines obtained from the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) website and literature was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: The analysis showed that as at end July 2021, 1,238 medicines were authorized in Europe, of which 332 (26.8%) were biological medicines. There were only 55 biosimilars for 17 unique biologicals. There is an increasing trend in biological authorizations but signifi cant delays in submission of applications for marketing authorization of biosimilars, with no signifi cant diff erences in the time for assessment for marketing authorization between originator biologicals and biosimilars. For some of the more recent biosimilars, applications for authorization were submitted prior to patent and exclusivity expiry. COVID vaccines confi rmed the impact of knowledge transfer on accessibility, especially when linked to joint procurement. Discussion: IP protects originator products and impacts the development of biosimilars. Strategies to improve competition in the EU biological market are discussed. Pricing policies alone do not increase biosimilar uptake since patients are switched to second generation products. Evergreening strategies might be abusing the IP framework, and together with trade secrets and disproportionate prices compared to R & D and manufacturing costs lead to an imbalance between market access and innovation. Conclusion: The European Pharmaceutical Strategy should focus on IP initiatives that support earlier authorization of biosimilars of new biologicals. Recommendations include knowledge sharing, simplifi cation of the regulatory framework and transparency of prices and R & D costs.","PeriodicalId":43994,"journal":{"name":"GaBI Journal-Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GaBI Journal-Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5639/gabij.2021.1004.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe (2020) proposes actions related to intellectual property (IP) rights as a means of ensuring patients’ access to medicines. This review aims to describe and discuss the European IP framework and its impact on accessibility of biological medicines and makes some recommendations. Methods: A non-systematic literature review on IP for biological medicines was conducted. Data on authorizations and patent and exclusivity expiry dates of biological medicines obtained from the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) website and literature was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: The analysis showed that as at end July 2021, 1,238 medicines were authorized in Europe, of which 332 (26.8%) were biological medicines. There were only 55 biosimilars for 17 unique biologicals. There is an increasing trend in biological authorizations but signifi cant delays in submission of applications for marketing authorization of biosimilars, with no signifi cant diff erences in the time for assessment for marketing authorization between originator biologicals and biosimilars. For some of the more recent biosimilars, applications for authorization were submitted prior to patent and exclusivity expiry. COVID vaccines confi rmed the impact of knowledge transfer on accessibility, especially when linked to joint procurement. Discussion: IP protects originator products and impacts the development of biosimilars. Strategies to improve competition in the EU biological market are discussed. Pricing policies alone do not increase biosimilar uptake since patients are switched to second generation products. Evergreening strategies might be abusing the IP framework, and together with trade secrets and disproportionate prices compared to R & D and manufacturing costs lead to an imbalance between market access and innovation. Conclusion: The European Pharmaceutical Strategy should focus on IP initiatives that support earlier authorization of biosimilars of new biologicals. Recommendations include knowledge sharing, simplifi cation of the regulatory framework and transparency of prices and R & D costs.
欧洲生物药品知识产权框架
导言:欧洲制药战略(2020)提出了与知识产权(IP)权利相关的行动,作为确保患者获得药物的手段。本综述旨在描述和讨论欧洲知识产权框架及其对生物药品可及性的影响,并提出一些建议。方法:对生物药品知识产权相关文献进行非系统综述。从欧洲药品管理局(EMA)网站和文献中获得的关于生物药品授权、专利和专有权到期日的数据进行了定量和定性分析。结果:分析显示,截至2021年7月底,欧洲共批准1238种药物,其中332种(26.8%)为生物药。17种独特的生物制剂只有55种生物仿制药。生物仿制药的上市许可申请有增加的趋势,但在提交上市许可申请方面存在明显的延迟,而原研生物制剂和生物仿制药的上市许可评估时间没有显著差异。对于一些较新的生物仿制药,授权申请是在专利和排他性到期之前提交的。COVID - 19疫苗证实了知识转移对可及性的影响,特别是与联合采购相关的知识转移。讨论:知识产权保护原创产品并影响生物仿制药的发展。讨论了提高欧盟生物市场竞争的策略。由于患者转而使用第二代产品,单靠定价政策并不能增加生物仿制药的吸收。常绿战略可能会滥用知识产权框架,再加上商业秘密以及与研发和制造成本相比不成比例的价格,导致市场准入与创新之间的不平衡。结论:欧洲制药战略应侧重于支持新生物制剂生物仿制药早期授权的知识产权倡议。建议包括知识共享、简化监管框架以及提高价格和研发成本的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The scope of GaBI Journal is broad and of interest and relevance to professionals active in clinical practice, pharmaceutical science and policy. Materials published in GaBI Journal include high quality research reports, literature reviews and case studies, all of which are peer reviewed. Manuscripts on all aspects of generic and biosimilar medicines, covering areas in clinical, fundamental, technical, manufacturing, bi-processing, economic and social aspects of pharmaceuticals and therapeutics are welcome. In addition, high quality work submitted in other formats, for example, scientific and evidence-based commentaries, may also be considered. In all cases, the emphasis is on quality, originality and knowledge contribution to those involved in health care. All manuscripts submitted to GaBI Journal are subject to a rigorous peer review process. GaBI Journal plans to be indexed in PubMed within two years, and that indexing will be retrospective. GaBI Journal is published quarterly from 2012. All articles are published in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信