A multi-national validity analysis of the self-perceived communication competence scale

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
S. Croucher, S. Kelly, Diyako Rahmani, Mark L. Burkey, Talgat Subanaliev, Flora Galy-Badenas, A. L. Lando, M. Chibita, Venantie Nyiransabimana, E. Turdubaeva, Nadirabegim Eskiçorapçı, K. Jackson
{"title":"A multi-national validity analysis of the self-perceived communication competence scale","authors":"S. Croucher, S. Kelly, Diyako Rahmani, Mark L. Burkey, Talgat Subanaliev, Flora Galy-Badenas, A. L. Lando, M. Chibita, Venantie Nyiransabimana, E. Turdubaeva, Nadirabegim Eskiçorapçı, K. Jackson","doi":"10.1080/17513057.2019.1569250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The self-perceived communication competence (SPCC) measure has been used in over 50 published studies since 2000. McCroskey and McCroskey (1988. Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5, 108–113. doi: 10.1080/08824098809359810) developed the measure to be used within the US college/university classroom. Despite its intended use, the measure is frequently used outside of the US and outside of the college/university setting without tests of measurement invariance. In fact, only four studies have performed tests of internal consistency on the measure since 2000, and each has found poor fit. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the utility of the measure outside of its intended population. The measure was utilized to survey respondents from 12 countries and failed to yield acceptable fit statistics in all samples, showing poor evidence of construct validity.","PeriodicalId":45717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International and Intercultural Communication","volume":"62 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International and Intercultural Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2019.1569250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT The self-perceived communication competence (SPCC) measure has been used in over 50 published studies since 2000. McCroskey and McCroskey (1988. Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5, 108–113. doi: 10.1080/08824098809359810) developed the measure to be used within the US college/university classroom. Despite its intended use, the measure is frequently used outside of the US and outside of the college/university setting without tests of measurement invariance. In fact, only four studies have performed tests of internal consistency on the measure since 2000, and each has found poor fit. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the utility of the measure outside of its intended population. The measure was utilized to survey respondents from 12 countries and failed to yield acceptable fit statistics in all samples, showing poor evidence of construct validity.
自我感知交际能力量表的跨国效度分析
自2000年以来,自我感知沟通能力(SPCC)测量已在50多篇已发表的研究中使用。麦克罗斯基和麦克罗斯基(1988)。自我报告是衡量沟通能力的一种方法。通讯研究报告,5,108-113。doi: 10.1080/08824098809359810)开发了在美国学院/大学课堂中使用的测量方法。尽管其预期用途,但该措施经常在美国以外和学院/大学设置之外使用,没有测试测量不变性。事实上,自2000年以来,只有四项研究对该指标进行了内部一致性测试,而且每项研究都发现契合度不高。因此,本研究的目的是评估该措施在其预期人群之外的效用。该措施用于调查来自12个国家的受访者,未能在所有样本中产生可接受的拟合统计数据,表明构造效度的证据不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信