Oxygen transfer parameters and oxygen uptake rates revisited

R. Mines
{"title":"Oxygen transfer parameters and oxygen uptake rates revisited","authors":"R. Mines","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2019.1694817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper provides a review of the essential equations and parameters that are used to design bioreactor aeration systems. Major objectives were to determine if the log-deficit method (LDM) and non-linear regression method (NLRM) yielded different results for the volumetric oxygen mass transfer coefficient (KL a)T and dissolved oxygen (DO) saturation concentration (Cs)T . Another objective was to compare and evaluate oxygen uptake rates (OURs) from the traditional BOD bottle technique with OURs determined from mass balances around completely-mixed activated sludge (CMAS) reactors. Full- and bench-scale, non-steady state reaeration tests were performed using sodium sulfite and cobalt chloride in addition to operating bench-scale CMAS reactors. Full-and bench-scale reaeration testing indicated there was no significant difference in the estimate of (KL a)T in tap water using the LDM or NLRM. Similarly, (Cs)T values were the same for the LDM and NLRM for 70 out of 119 reaeration tests. Actual oxygen uptake rates (AOURs) measured using the BOD bottle technique versus calculated oxygen uptake rates (COURS) were the same for 26 out of 51 data sets evaluated. The alpha-factor (α) increased as the solids retention time (SRT) was increased.","PeriodicalId":15733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","volume":"54 1","pages":"345 - 353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1694817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides a review of the essential equations and parameters that are used to design bioreactor aeration systems. Major objectives were to determine if the log-deficit method (LDM) and non-linear regression method (NLRM) yielded different results for the volumetric oxygen mass transfer coefficient (KL a)T and dissolved oxygen (DO) saturation concentration (Cs)T . Another objective was to compare and evaluate oxygen uptake rates (OURs) from the traditional BOD bottle technique with OURs determined from mass balances around completely-mixed activated sludge (CMAS) reactors. Full- and bench-scale, non-steady state reaeration tests were performed using sodium sulfite and cobalt chloride in addition to operating bench-scale CMAS reactors. Full-and bench-scale reaeration testing indicated there was no significant difference in the estimate of (KL a)T in tap water using the LDM or NLRM. Similarly, (Cs)T values were the same for the LDM and NLRM for 70 out of 119 reaeration tests. Actual oxygen uptake rates (AOURs) measured using the BOD bottle technique versus calculated oxygen uptake rates (COURS) were the same for 26 out of 51 data sets evaluated. The alpha-factor (α) increased as the solids retention time (SRT) was increased.
氧转移参数和吸氧速率重新审视
摘要本文综述了用于设计生物反应器曝气系统的基本方程和参数。主要目的是确定对数赤字法(LDM)和非线性回归法(NLRM)对体积氧传质系数(KL a)T和溶解氧(DO)饱和浓度(Cs)T是否产生不同的结果。另一个目标是比较和评估传统BOD瓶技术与完全混合活性污泥反应器(CMAS)周围质量平衡确定的吸氧速率(our)。除了运行实验规模的CMAS反应器外,还使用亚硫酸钠和氯化钴进行了全尺寸和实验规模的非稳态再循环试验。实验结果表明,使用LDM和NLRM对自来水中(KL a)T的估计没有显著差异。同样,在119次再循环试验中,70次LDM和NLRM的(Cs)T值相同。在评估的51个数据集中,有26个使用BOD瓶技术测量的实际摄氧量(AOURs)与计算的摄氧量(COURS)相同。α因子(α)随固相保留时间(SRT)的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信