Women’s Perceptions of Zika Virus Prevention Recommendations in Fortaleza, Brazil

Jeni A. Stolow, C. Kendall, Francisco Marto Leal Pinheiro, Mariana Campos da Rocha Feitosa, Kelly Alves de Almeida Furtado, Adriano Ferreira Martins, Mayara Paz Albino dos Santos, Ana Ecilda Lima Ellery, L. Dias, Ivana Cristina de Holanda Barreto, L. Moses, Arachu Castro, Christopher Dunn, L. Kerr
{"title":"Women’s Perceptions of Zika Virus Prevention Recommendations in Fortaleza, Brazil","authors":"Jeni A. Stolow, C. Kendall, Francisco Marto Leal Pinheiro, Mariana Campos da Rocha Feitosa, Kelly Alves de Almeida Furtado, Adriano Ferreira Martins, Mayara Paz Albino dos Santos, Ana Ecilda Lima Ellery, L. Dias, Ivana Cristina de Holanda Barreto, L. Moses, Arachu Castro, Christopher Dunn, L. Kerr","doi":"10.1177/2632077020970875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a response to the rise in microcephaly cases in 2015, Brazilian health authorities recommended a number of Zika virus (ZIKV) prevention behaviors. This study explores the contrast between the Brazilian health authorities’ health promotion response to the epidemic and the context in which the epidemic unfolded. Rapid Anthropological Assessment was used to assess how women in Fortaleza, Brazil, perceive ZIKV, ZIKV prevention recommendations, and the feasibility of adhering to these recommendations. Semi-structured interviews, informational interviews, and observations were used. The ZIKV recommendations and prevention did not represent best practices in health communication and promotion and failed to achieve their goals. Prevention recommendations were delivered without actionable steps and without considering cultural, socioeconomic, or environmental contexts. It is imperative to take advantage of this interepidemic period to apply best practices in health communication, education, and promotion to ensure populations at risk have adequate awareness, information, and resources to prevent infection.","PeriodicalId":73906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention and health promotion","volume":"61 1","pages":"288 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention and health promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2632077020970875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a response to the rise in microcephaly cases in 2015, Brazilian health authorities recommended a number of Zika virus (ZIKV) prevention behaviors. This study explores the contrast between the Brazilian health authorities’ health promotion response to the epidemic and the context in which the epidemic unfolded. Rapid Anthropological Assessment was used to assess how women in Fortaleza, Brazil, perceive ZIKV, ZIKV prevention recommendations, and the feasibility of adhering to these recommendations. Semi-structured interviews, informational interviews, and observations were used. The ZIKV recommendations and prevention did not represent best practices in health communication and promotion and failed to achieve their goals. Prevention recommendations were delivered without actionable steps and without considering cultural, socioeconomic, or environmental contexts. It is imperative to take advantage of this interepidemic period to apply best practices in health communication, education, and promotion to ensure populations at risk have adequate awareness, information, and resources to prevent infection.
巴西福塔莱萨妇女对寨卡病毒预防建议的看法
作为对2015年小头症病例上升的应对措施,巴西卫生当局建议采取一些预防寨卡病毒的行为。本研究探讨了巴西卫生当局对流行病的健康促进反应与流行病展开的背景之间的对比。使用快速人类学评估来评估巴西福塔莱萨的妇女如何看待寨卡病毒、寨卡病毒预防建议以及遵守这些建议的可行性。采用了半结构化访谈、信息访谈和观察。寨卡病毒的建议和预防并不代表卫生宣传和促进的最佳做法,未能实现其目标。提出预防建议时没有采取可行步骤,也没有考虑文化、社会经济或环境背景。必须利用这一流行病间期,在卫生宣传、教育和宣传方面应用最佳做法,以确保有风险的人群有足够的认识、信息和资源来预防感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信