Features of the Modern Protectionism of the US and the EU towards Russia

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
A. Sidorov
{"title":"Features of the Modern Protectionism of the US and the EU towards Russia","authors":"A. Sidorov","doi":"10.24833/2071-8160-2022-4-85-81-101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the current trends and features of US and EU protectionism towards Russia, its possible consequences and ways of response. Protectionism has been increasing since 2020, which is manifested in the intensification of the use of existing instruments and the development of the new ones.The article analyzes possible consequences of the spike in countervailing investigations by the US against Russia. The author highlights possible application of similar restrictive measures by other partners as an additional risk. An unprecedented event is the US Department of Commerce review of Russia’s status as a market economy country for purposes of antidumping duty investigations. Non-market economy status expands the capabilities of the US to “overcount” dumping and impose duties, thus impeding the activity of Russian companies on foreign markets. The US acknowledged for now that there does not exist a sufficient degree of evidence to justify a change in Russia’s market economy designation, nevertheless, one cannot rule out such attempts in the future.In the EU context, the practice of energy adjustments, which results in overstated production costs, normal value and anti-dumping duties for Russian goods, is continued. A new protectionist step is the publication of the report “On significant distortions in the economy of the Russian Federation for the purposes of trade defence investigations”, which lays an additional basis for the continuation and strengthening of restrictive measures. The article analyzes a new instrument of environmental protectionism, the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism, a levy on imported products based on the embedded CO2 emissions. The measure will affect important positions of the Russian exports – cement, electricity, fertilizers, iron & steel and aluminum. The mechanism can be considered an attempt to make up for the EU’s lack of natural competitive advantages in mineral raw materials and to impose its vision of economic policy goals on the rest of the world.In conclusion, the author highlights features of American and European protectionism towards Russia – active employment of the role of the state in the economy factor as well as environmental factor as pretexts for introducing or tightening restrictive measures.The main ways of Russia’s response to new challenges can be the use of the WTO platform in cooperation with other countries, the search for new economic levers in relations with the partners (including application of trade defence measures), the detection of possible market distortions in the EU and the US for possible use in EAEU investigations.","PeriodicalId":42127,"journal":{"name":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-4-85-81-101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the current trends and features of US and EU protectionism towards Russia, its possible consequences and ways of response. Protectionism has been increasing since 2020, which is manifested in the intensification of the use of existing instruments and the development of the new ones.The article analyzes possible consequences of the spike in countervailing investigations by the US against Russia. The author highlights possible application of similar restrictive measures by other partners as an additional risk. An unprecedented event is the US Department of Commerce review of Russia’s status as a market economy country for purposes of antidumping duty investigations. Non-market economy status expands the capabilities of the US to “overcount” dumping and impose duties, thus impeding the activity of Russian companies on foreign markets. The US acknowledged for now that there does not exist a sufficient degree of evidence to justify a change in Russia’s market economy designation, nevertheless, one cannot rule out such attempts in the future.In the EU context, the practice of energy adjustments, which results in overstated production costs, normal value and anti-dumping duties for Russian goods, is continued. A new protectionist step is the publication of the report “On significant distortions in the economy of the Russian Federation for the purposes of trade defence investigations”, which lays an additional basis for the continuation and strengthening of restrictive measures. The article analyzes a new instrument of environmental protectionism, the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism, a levy on imported products based on the embedded CO2 emissions. The measure will affect important positions of the Russian exports – cement, electricity, fertilizers, iron & steel and aluminum. The mechanism can be considered an attempt to make up for the EU’s lack of natural competitive advantages in mineral raw materials and to impose its vision of economic policy goals on the rest of the world.In conclusion, the author highlights features of American and European protectionism towards Russia – active employment of the role of the state in the economy factor as well as environmental factor as pretexts for introducing or tightening restrictive measures.The main ways of Russia’s response to new challenges can be the use of the WTO platform in cooperation with other countries, the search for new economic levers in relations with the partners (including application of trade defence measures), the detection of possible market distortions in the EU and the US for possible use in EAEU investigations.
美国和欧盟对俄罗斯的现代保护主义特征
本文考察了当前美国和欧盟对俄保护主义的趋势和特点、可能的后果和应对方式。2020年以来,保护主义有所抬头,主要表现在加强使用现有工具和开发新工具。这篇文章分析了美国对俄罗斯反补贴调查激增可能带来的后果。作者强调,其他合作伙伴可能采取类似的限制性措施是一种额外的风险。美国商务部为了反倾销税调查而审查俄罗斯的市场经济国家地位,这是一个前所未有的事件。非市场经济地位扩大了美国“超额计算”倾销并征收关税的能力,从而阻碍了俄罗斯企业在国外市场的活动。美国目前承认,没有足够的证据证明改变俄罗斯的市场经济地位是合理的,然而,人们不能排除未来会有这种尝试。在欧盟范围内,能源调整的做法仍在继续,这种做法导致俄罗斯商品的生产成本、正常价值和反倾销税被高估。一个新的保护主义步骤是发表了“关于俄罗斯联邦经济为贸易防卫调查而严重扭曲情况”的报告,这为继续和加强限制性措施奠定了进一步的基础。本文分析了一种新的环境保护主义工具——欧盟的碳边界调整机制,即对进口产品征收二氧化碳排放税。这一措施将影响俄罗斯出口的重要领域——水泥、电力、化肥、钢铁和铝。该机制可以被视为一种尝试,旨在弥补欧盟在矿产原材料方面缺乏天然竞争优势的不足,并将其经济政策目标的愿景强加给世界其他地区。最后,作者强调了欧美对俄保护主义的特点——积极利用国家在经济因素和环境因素中的作用作为引入或收紧限制措施的借口。俄罗斯应对新挑战的主要方式可以是利用世贸组织平台与其他国家合作,在与合作伙伴的关系中寻找新的经济杠杆(包括应用贸易防御措施),发现欧盟和美国可能存在的市场扭曲,以便在欧亚经济联盟调查中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MGIMO Review of International Relations
MGIMO Review of International Relations INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信