Evaluating the impact of audit interventions on accidental removal of critical care devices in the intensive care unit - Clinical Audit Project

A. Noor
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of audit interventions on accidental removal of critical care devices in the intensive care unit - Clinical Audit Project","authors":"A. Noor","doi":"10.31579/2690-8794/047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accidental critical care device removals in intensive care units (ICUs) are serious preventable incidents that have major implications. The study aimed to understand possible causes of such events and identify interventions that reduced their occurrence. The researchers conducted a single-center audit by collecting patient data and bundle forms for accidental device removal across two consecutive periods; they retrospectively reviewed the data from the first period (August 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020) and prospectively analyzed the data from the bundle forms obtained in the second (February 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020). From the findings of the first period, the researchers designed an intervention comprising nurses’ adherence to a care bundle checklist and an educational campaign for the care-taking team and applied it in the second period. Patients either accidentally removed the central venous lines secondary to agitation (47%), or it happened by loss of catheter securement (21%), or during daily care (17%) or patient transfer (13%). Such inadvertent incidents resulted in reinsertion with another central venous line (69%), agitation due to sedation interruption (47%), development of hemodynamic instability because of interruption of inotrope administration (30%), significant bleeding that required intervention (21%), and no complications (39%). The overall nurses’ compliance to the care bundle checklist improved from 87% to 97% after introduction of the intervention and the number of devices found in place increased. Therefore, the designed care bundle checklist and educational program successfully decreased the accidental removal of critical care devices.","PeriodicalId":10427,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accidental critical care device removals in intensive care units (ICUs) are serious preventable incidents that have major implications. The study aimed to understand possible causes of such events and identify interventions that reduced their occurrence. The researchers conducted a single-center audit by collecting patient data and bundle forms for accidental device removal across two consecutive periods; they retrospectively reviewed the data from the first period (August 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020) and prospectively analyzed the data from the bundle forms obtained in the second (February 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020). From the findings of the first period, the researchers designed an intervention comprising nurses’ adherence to a care bundle checklist and an educational campaign for the care-taking team and applied it in the second period. Patients either accidentally removed the central venous lines secondary to agitation (47%), or it happened by loss of catheter securement (21%), or during daily care (17%) or patient transfer (13%). Such inadvertent incidents resulted in reinsertion with another central venous line (69%), agitation due to sedation interruption (47%), development of hemodynamic instability because of interruption of inotrope administration (30%), significant bleeding that required intervention (21%), and no complications (39%). The overall nurses’ compliance to the care bundle checklist improved from 87% to 97% after introduction of the intervention and the number of devices found in place increased. Therefore, the designed care bundle checklist and educational program successfully decreased the accidental removal of critical care devices.
评估审计干预对重症监护室意外移除重症监护设备的影响——临床审计项目
重症监护病房(icu)的意外重症监护设备移除是具有重大影响的严重可预防事件。该研究旨在了解此类事件的可能原因,并确定减少其发生的干预措施。研究人员通过收集患者数据和连续两个时期意外器械移除的捆绑表格进行了单中心审计;他们回顾性地回顾了第一期(2019年8月1日至2020年1月31日)的数据,并前瞻性地分析了第二期(2020年2月1日至2020年7月31日)获得的捆绑表格的数据。根据第一阶段的研究结果,研究人员设计了一种干预措施,包括护士遵守护理包清单和护理团队的教育活动,并将其应用于第二阶段。患者因躁动引起的中心静脉线意外切除(47%),或由于导管固定丢失(21%),或在日常护理(17%)或患者转移(13%)中发生。这些意外事件导致另一条中心静脉线重新插入(69%),镇静中断引起的躁动(47%),因收缩性药物给药中断引起的血流动力学不稳定(30%),需要干预的严重出血(21%),无并发症(39%)。引入干预措施后,护士对护理包检查表的总体依从性从87%提高到97%,发现到位的设备数量也增加了。因此,设计的护理包清单和教育计划成功地减少了意外移除危重护理设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信