E. Berlinger, J. Keresztúri, Á. Lublóy, Zsuzsanna Tamásné Vőneki
{"title":"Does governance matter? Country-level determinants of operational risk","authors":"E. Berlinger, J. Keresztúri, Á. Lublóy, Zsuzsanna Tamásné Vőneki","doi":"10.1556/204.2021.00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The severity and frequency of operational loss events show high variability across the globe. In this paper, we first examine the extent to which the quality of country-level governance measured by the Worldwide Governance Indicators explains cross-country variation of operational losses. We use the comprehensive database of SAS OpRisk Global for the period of 2008–2019 covering 132 countries and 8,144 loss events with a total loss amount of almost 490 billion USD. Our findings indicate that the governance indicators lost their explanatory power over the past decades, which contradicts the academic consensus and calls for new explanatory variables. To find these variables, we hypothesize that the changes are driven by some important megatrends such as economic development and technological advancement, globalization, and sustainability. Accordingly, we propose an extended model where the number of mobile subscribers, the export to GDP ratio, and the poverty headcount ratio were significant for the frequency. For severity, only GDP is a significant and robust explanatory variable. Investors, regulators, and analysts should, therefore, concentrate on these factors if they wish to model, manage, or mitigate operational risks.","PeriodicalId":40049,"journal":{"name":"Society and Economy","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2021.00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The severity and frequency of operational loss events show high variability across the globe. In this paper, we first examine the extent to which the quality of country-level governance measured by the Worldwide Governance Indicators explains cross-country variation of operational losses. We use the comprehensive database of SAS OpRisk Global for the period of 2008–2019 covering 132 countries and 8,144 loss events with a total loss amount of almost 490 billion USD. Our findings indicate that the governance indicators lost their explanatory power over the past decades, which contradicts the academic consensus and calls for new explanatory variables. To find these variables, we hypothesize that the changes are driven by some important megatrends such as economic development and technological advancement, globalization, and sustainability. Accordingly, we propose an extended model where the number of mobile subscribers, the export to GDP ratio, and the poverty headcount ratio were significant for the frequency. For severity, only GDP is a significant and robust explanatory variable. Investors, regulators, and analysts should, therefore, concentrate on these factors if they wish to model, manage, or mitigate operational risks.
操作损失事件的严重程度和频率在全球范围内表现出很大的变化。在本文中,我们首先考察了由全球治理指标衡量的国家一级治理质量在多大程度上解释了经营损失的跨国差异。我们使用SAS OpRisk Global 2008-2019年的综合数据库,涵盖132个国家和8144个损失事件,总损失金额近4900亿美元。我们的研究结果表明,治理指标在过去几十年中失去了解释力,这与学术界的共识相矛盾,需要新的解释变量。为了找到这些变量,我们假设这些变化是由一些重要的大趋势驱动的,如经济发展和技术进步、全球化和可持续性。因此,我们提出了一个扩展模型,其中移动用户数量、出口占GDP的比例和贫困人口比例对频率有显著影响。就严重程度而言,只有GDP是一个显著且稳健的解释变量。因此,投资者、监管机构和分析师如果希望建模、管理或减轻操作风险,就应该关注这些因素。
期刊介绍:
The double-blind peer-reviewed journal publishes original research articles and book reviews in the fields of economics, social sciences, and business studies, which address social and economic issues in Central and Eastern Europe or have relevance for social and economic development in this region. While it welcomes articles from the international academic community, Society and Economy seeks in particular to provide an international forum for scholars working in the research traditions of this region. The journal welcomes submissions of high-quality and multi-disciplinary articles that address social, demographic, political, economic and industrial trends and challenges. Society and Economy is a gold open access journal since 2019 but authors are not requested to pay an article processing fee.