{"title":"La inducción analítica como método sociológico desde una perspectiva histórica","authors":"A. Sosa","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl objetivo de este articulo es estudiar la induccion analitica como metodo cientifico de investigacion, es decir, como modo valido de hacer ciencia. En 1934, su creador, el filosofo y sociologo Florian Znaniecki, afirmo que este era el metodo que debia ser adoptado en toda investigacion sociologica. Su relevancia radica en que se propone encontrar explicaciones globales de los fenomenos sociales a partir de la utilizacion de tecnicas cualitativas de investigacion. Aqui adopto una perspectiva historica que permite inscribir su emergencia y evolucion en un contexto mayor del desarrollo de metodologias cualitativas en sociologia, para luego reflexionar sobre sus presupuestos epistemologicos y las criticas de las que fue objeto. Por ultimo, realizo un balance de los aportes de esta metodologia a la disciplina. EnglishThe aim of this article is to study analytic induction as a scientific research method, that is, as a valid way of making science. In 1934, the philosopher and sociologist Florian Znaniecki, its creator, referred to this methodology as the method that should be adopted by any sociological research. Its relevance lies on the fact that its goal is to find global explanations to social phenomena by using qualitative research techniques. I adopt a historical perspective to inscribe this method’s emergency and evolution in a larger context of the development of qualitative methods in sociology, and then reflect upon its epistemological basis and the criticisms made in relation to it. Finally, I evaluate this method’s contributions to the discipline.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
espanolEl objetivo de este articulo es estudiar la induccion analitica como metodo cientifico de investigacion, es decir, como modo valido de hacer ciencia. En 1934, su creador, el filosofo y sociologo Florian Znaniecki, afirmo que este era el metodo que debia ser adoptado en toda investigacion sociologica. Su relevancia radica en que se propone encontrar explicaciones globales de los fenomenos sociales a partir de la utilizacion de tecnicas cualitativas de investigacion. Aqui adopto una perspectiva historica que permite inscribir su emergencia y evolucion en un contexto mayor del desarrollo de metodologias cualitativas en sociologia, para luego reflexionar sobre sus presupuestos epistemologicos y las criticas de las que fue objeto. Por ultimo, realizo un balance de los aportes de esta metodologia a la disciplina. EnglishThe aim of this article is to study analytic induction as a scientific research method, that is, as a valid way of making science. In 1934, the philosopher and sociologist Florian Znaniecki, its creator, referred to this methodology as the method that should be adopted by any sociological research. Its relevance lies on the fact that its goal is to find global explanations to social phenomena by using qualitative research techniques. I adopt a historical perspective to inscribe this method’s emergency and evolution in a larger context of the development of qualitative methods in sociology, and then reflect upon its epistemological basis and the criticisms made in relation to it. Finally, I evaluate this method’s contributions to the discipline.
本文的目的是研究分析归纳作为一种科学研究方法,即作为一种有效的科学方法。1934年,它的创始人、哲学家和社会学家弗洛里安·兹纳涅茨基(Florian Znaniecki)断言,这是所有社会学研究都应该采用的方法。本研究的目的是通过定性研究技术的使用来寻找社会现象的全球解释。在这篇文章中,我试图从社会学的角度来看待它的出现和演变,然后反思它的认识论假设和对它的批评。最后,我评估了这种方法对学科的贡献。这篇文章的目的是研究分析归纳法作为一种科学研究方法,也就是一种有效的科学方法。1934 In, the philosopher and sociologist弗洛Znaniecki及其creator、修正的,应当通过这种方法as the method by any sociological research。性病的史蒂文·索德伯格事实that Its goal is to find on the global社会纪要explanations by using定性研究的技术。我采用历史的观点,把这种方法的出现和演变放在社会学定性方法发展的更广泛的背景下,然后反映其认识论基础和与之相关的批评。最后,我评估了这个方法对学科的贡献。
期刊介绍:
Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.