La inducción analítica como método sociológico desde una perspectiva histórica

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
A. Sosa
{"title":"La inducción analítica como método sociológico desde una perspectiva histórica","authors":"A. Sosa","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl objetivo de este articulo es estudiar la induccion analitica como metodo cientifico de investigacion, es decir, como modo valido de hacer ciencia. En 1934, su creador, el filosofo y sociologo Florian Znaniecki, afirmo que este era el metodo que debia ser adoptado en toda investigacion sociologica. Su relevancia radica en que se propone encontrar explicaciones globales de los fenomenos sociales a partir de la utilizacion de tecnicas cualitativas de investigacion. Aqui adopto una perspectiva historica que permite inscribir su emergencia y evolucion en un contexto mayor del desarrollo de metodologias cualitativas en sociologia, para luego reflexionar sobre sus presupuestos epistemologicos y las criticas de las que fue objeto. Por ultimo, realizo un balance de los aportes de esta metodologia a la disciplina. EnglishThe aim of this article is to study analytic induction as a scientific research method, that is, as a valid way of making science. In 1934, the philosopher and sociologist Florian Znaniecki, its creator, referred to this methodology as the method that should be adopted by any sociological research. Its relevance lies on the fact that its goal is to find global explanations to social phenomena by using qualitative research techniques. I adopt a historical perspective to inscribe this method’s emergency and evolution in a larger context of the development of qualitative methods in sociology, and then reflect upon its epistemological basis and the criticisms made in relation to it. Finally, I evaluate this method’s contributions to the discipline.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

espanolEl objetivo de este articulo es estudiar la induccion analitica como metodo cientifico de investigacion, es decir, como modo valido de hacer ciencia. En 1934, su creador, el filosofo y sociologo Florian Znaniecki, afirmo que este era el metodo que debia ser adoptado en toda investigacion sociologica. Su relevancia radica en que se propone encontrar explicaciones globales de los fenomenos sociales a partir de la utilizacion de tecnicas cualitativas de investigacion. Aqui adopto una perspectiva historica que permite inscribir su emergencia y evolucion en un contexto mayor del desarrollo de metodologias cualitativas en sociologia, para luego reflexionar sobre sus presupuestos epistemologicos y las criticas de las que fue objeto. Por ultimo, realizo un balance de los aportes de esta metodologia a la disciplina. EnglishThe aim of this article is to study analytic induction as a scientific research method, that is, as a valid way of making science. In 1934, the philosopher and sociologist Florian Znaniecki, its creator, referred to this methodology as the method that should be adopted by any sociological research. Its relevance lies on the fact that its goal is to find global explanations to social phenomena by using qualitative research techniques. I adopt a historical perspective to inscribe this method’s emergency and evolution in a larger context of the development of qualitative methods in sociology, and then reflect upon its epistemological basis and the criticisms made in relation to it. Finally, I evaluate this method’s contributions to the discipline.
分析归纳法作为一种历史视角下的社会学方法
本文的目的是研究分析归纳作为一种科学研究方法,即作为一种有效的科学方法。1934年,它的创始人、哲学家和社会学家弗洛里安·兹纳涅茨基(Florian Znaniecki)断言,这是所有社会学研究都应该采用的方法。本研究的目的是通过定性研究技术的使用来寻找社会现象的全球解释。在这篇文章中,我试图从社会学的角度来看待它的出现和演变,然后反思它的认识论假设和对它的批评。最后,我评估了这种方法对学科的贡献。这篇文章的目的是研究分析归纳法作为一种科学研究方法,也就是一种有效的科学方法。1934 In, the philosopher and sociologist弗洛Znaniecki及其creator、修正的,应当通过这种方法as the method by any sociological research。性病的史蒂文·索德伯格事实that Its goal is to find on the global社会纪要explanations by using定性研究的技术。我采用历史的观点,把这种方法的出现和演变放在社会学定性方法发展的更广泛的背景下,然后反映其认识论基础和与之相关的批评。最后,我评估了这个方法对学科的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cinta de Moebio
Cinta de Moebio PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信