Evaluation of the health of the peri-implant tissues around immediately placed dental implants in aggressive periodontitis patients versus periodontally healthy individuals in the maxillary esthetic zone: Controlled clinical trial

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
N. Yussif, Abdel Rahman, M. Darhous
{"title":"Evaluation of the health of the peri-implant tissues around immediately placed dental implants in aggressive periodontitis patients versus periodontally healthy individuals in the maxillary esthetic zone: Controlled clinical trial","authors":"N. Yussif, Abdel Rahman, M. Darhous","doi":"10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To evaluate the health condition of the immediately placed dental implants in aggressive periodontitis patients compared to periodontally healthy individuals after 12 months of follow up. Materials and methods Following atraumatic tooth extraction, 70 implants were placed in two study groups: Thirty-five implants replaced hopeless teeth in aggressive periodontitis patients (test group) and thirty-five implants replaced periodontally healthy unrestrorable teeth (control group).  Results After 12 months, there were no dropouts in both groups. The criteria of the health scale showed 97.17% success in the test group versus 100% in the control group. Due to peri-implant mucosistis, only 2.85% implants in the test group showed satisfactory survival rate. It was also found that 20% of the inserted implants in both groups were covered with bone during the second stage surgery. Lack of pain, mobility, exudate and suppuration with no incidence of peri-implant diseases were clearly detected in both groups indicating the success rate. There was no statistical significant difference between the results in both groups. Conclusions  The current study highlights that immediate placement did not affect health and survival of the implants in aggressive periodontitis patients. Nearly equal results were reported between periodontally healthy and periodontally affected patients. Long- term follow up studies are recommended to examine the failure rate that could not be reported in the current short-term study.","PeriodicalId":42724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osseointegration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osseointegration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim To evaluate the health condition of the immediately placed dental implants in aggressive periodontitis patients compared to periodontally healthy individuals after 12 months of follow up. Materials and methods Following atraumatic tooth extraction, 70 implants were placed in two study groups: Thirty-five implants replaced hopeless teeth in aggressive periodontitis patients (test group) and thirty-five implants replaced periodontally healthy unrestrorable teeth (control group).  Results After 12 months, there were no dropouts in both groups. The criteria of the health scale showed 97.17% success in the test group versus 100% in the control group. Due to peri-implant mucosistis, only 2.85% implants in the test group showed satisfactory survival rate. It was also found that 20% of the inserted implants in both groups were covered with bone during the second stage surgery. Lack of pain, mobility, exudate and suppuration with no incidence of peri-implant diseases were clearly detected in both groups indicating the success rate. There was no statistical significant difference between the results in both groups. Conclusions  The current study highlights that immediate placement did not affect health and survival of the implants in aggressive periodontitis patients. Nearly equal results were reported between periodontally healthy and periodontally affected patients. Long- term follow up studies are recommended to examine the failure rate that could not be reported in the current short-term study.
评估侵略性牙周炎患者与牙周健康者在上颌审美区立即放置种植体周围种植体组织的健康:对照临床试验
目的评价侵袭性牙周炎患者即刻种植体与牙周健康者12个月随访后的健康状况。材料与方法采用无创性拔牙后种植体70颗,分为两组:35颗种植体替代侵袭性牙周炎患者的无望牙齿(试验组),35颗种植体替代牙周健康的不可修复牙齿(对照组)。结果12个月后,两组患者均无退出现象。健康量表标准的合格率为97.17%,对照组为100%。由于种植体周围粘膜炎,试验组种植体成活率仅为2.85%。我们还发现,在第二阶段的手术中,两组中20%的植入物被骨覆盖。两组均无疼痛、活动、渗出、化脓,无种植体周围疾病发生,提示成功率。两组结果比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:目前的研究强调,在侵袭性牙周炎患者中,即刻放置种植体并不影响其健康和生存。牙周健康患者和牙周疾病患者的结果几乎相同。建议进行长期随访研究,以检查目前短期研究中无法报告的失败率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Osseointegration
Journal of Osseointegration DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信