How do women and health care professionals view hormonal long-acting reversible contraception? Results from an international survey

T. Faustmann, J. Crocker, C. Moeller, Yvonne Engler, C. Caetano, K. Buhling
{"title":"How do women and health care professionals view hormonal long-acting reversible contraception? Results from an international survey","authors":"T. Faustmann, J. Crocker, C. Moeller, Yvonne Engler, C. Caetano, K. Buhling","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2019.1666362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: Evidence from real-world settings is important to provide an accurate picture of health care delivery. We investigated use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in women aged 15–49 years. Materials and methods: Two surveys, one of women and one of health care professionals (HCPs), were conducted in parallel across seven countries. Participating women completed an online survey to assess contraceptive awareness, current method of contraception, age, and experience with current contraceptive method. HCPs participated in an online survey to provide practice-level information and three anonymous charts of hormonal LARC users. Results: Of 6903 women who completed the survey, 3225 provided information about their current primary contraception method. Overall, 16% used LARC methods, while 52% used oral contraceptives (OCs). Of hormonal intrauterine system users, 72% described their experience as ‘very favourable’, compared with only 53% of women using OCs. Anonymous patient records (n = 1605) were provided by 550 HCPs who completed the online survey. Most women (64%) had used short-acting reversible contraception before switching to LARC. Physicians perceived 56–84% of LARC users to be highly satisfied with their current form of contraception. Conclusions: Although usage of LARC was low, most women using LARC were highly satisfied with their method of contraception.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"37 1","pages":"422 - 429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2019.1666362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Evidence from real-world settings is important to provide an accurate picture of health care delivery. We investigated use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in women aged 15–49 years. Materials and methods: Two surveys, one of women and one of health care professionals (HCPs), were conducted in parallel across seven countries. Participating women completed an online survey to assess contraceptive awareness, current method of contraception, age, and experience with current contraceptive method. HCPs participated in an online survey to provide practice-level information and three anonymous charts of hormonal LARC users. Results: Of 6903 women who completed the survey, 3225 provided information about their current primary contraception method. Overall, 16% used LARC methods, while 52% used oral contraceptives (OCs). Of hormonal intrauterine system users, 72% described their experience as ‘very favourable’, compared with only 53% of women using OCs. Anonymous patient records (n = 1605) were provided by 550 HCPs who completed the online survey. Most women (64%) had used short-acting reversible contraception before switching to LARC. Physicians perceived 56–84% of LARC users to be highly satisfied with their current form of contraception. Conclusions: Although usage of LARC was low, most women using LARC were highly satisfied with their method of contraception.
妇女和卫生保健专业人员如何看待激素长效可逆避孕?这是一项国际调查的结果
目的:来自真实世界的证据对于提供医疗服务的准确图景非常重要。我们调查了15-49岁女性长效可逆避孕(LARC)的使用情况。材料和方法:在七个国家平行进行了两项调查,一项是妇女调查,另一项是卫生保健专业人员调查。参与的妇女完成了一项在线调查,以评估避孕意识、当前避孕方法、年龄和当前避孕方法的经验。HCPs参与了一项在线调查,以提供实践水平的信息和三张激素LARC使用者的匿名图表。结果:在6903名完成调查的妇女中,3225名提供了她们目前主要避孕方法的信息。总体而言,16%的人使用LARC方法,52%的人使用口服避孕药。在使用激素宫内系统的女性中,72%的人认为她们的体验“非常好”,而使用OCs的女性中只有53%的人认为她们的体验“非常好”。完成在线调查的550名HCPs提供了匿名患者记录(n = 1605)。大多数妇女(64%)在改用LARC之前使用过短效可逆避孕。医生认为56-84%的LARC使用者对他们目前的避孕方式非常满意。结论:虽然LARC的使用率较低,但大多数使用LARC的妇女对其避孕方法非常满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信