The World until Yesterday: What Can We Learn from Traditional Societies?

Cadey Korson
{"title":"The World until Yesterday: What Can We Learn from Traditional Societies?","authors":"Cadey Korson","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-0957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Until Yesterday: What Can We Learn from Traditional Societies? By Jared Diamond New York: Penguin Group, 2012. Vii + 499pp. Tables, figures, further readings, index, and illustration credits. $23.59, (cloth) ISBN 978-0-670-02481-0; $16.20, (paper) ISBN 978-1-101-60600-1.In his most recent book, Jared Diamond offers a series of lessons gleaned from decades of field research in spatially and culturally disparate indigenous communities . Through a comparison of modern states and traditional societies, Diamond presents a variety of lessons for the individual and the modern state Instead of comparing traditional and state-centered societies through a rational, cultural, or spatial approach, this text utilizes a more comprehensive method that includes all of these aspects . Using this comprehensive comparative method, Diamond elucidates several ethnographic-based conceptions of and lessons about everything from danger, to the treatment of children and the elderly, language, food, dispute resolution, and religion . The significance of this book lies in the vast wealth of anthropologic research and information about how traditional societies interact with their local landscape The lessons provided may be useful for some, but Diamond's take-it-or-leave-it attitude towards changing individual and state perceptions toward the previously-mentioned issues undermines his perceived emphasis on the significance of the information impartedEconomic anthropologists and historical geographers may find Diamond's discussion of traditional forms of trade and subsequent implications for the contemporary global economy interesting Relationships between societies are categorized in four distinct ways: defending boundaries, sharing resources, making war, and trading. Looking at the link between trade, goods, social networks, and class, Diamond identifies two critical similarities between traditional and modern state trade: the gathering of items to confer status, and in some cases, the exchange of some type of currency. For this purpose, Diamond attempts to organize a list of the following items commonly traded in the traditional societies he studies: \"necessities\" (raw materials and manufactured items), \"gray,\" and \"luxury\" categories (68-69) . His chart separates items that are immediately useful for survival and daily life from an intermediate category and luxury category The intermediate level comprises items that are both useful and impart some amount of status that make them valuable beyond their utility Luxuries or decorative items, meanwhile, are those that are not immediately useful for survival This three-part typology is useful in cataloguing items of trade, but also in identifying levels of socio-economic class, allowing one to make comparisons with market economies . Despite the usefulness of this typology in organizing goods and their socio-economic implications, Diamond argues that it is unreasonable to categorize items of trade by relegating them to luxury or functional statuses because these definitions are often relative and culturally-specific. …","PeriodicalId":81941,"journal":{"name":"Material culture","volume":"53 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Material culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-0957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

The World Until Yesterday: What Can We Learn from Traditional Societies? By Jared Diamond New York: Penguin Group, 2012. Vii + 499pp. Tables, figures, further readings, index, and illustration credits. $23.59, (cloth) ISBN 978-0-670-02481-0; $16.20, (paper) ISBN 978-1-101-60600-1.In his most recent book, Jared Diamond offers a series of lessons gleaned from decades of field research in spatially and culturally disparate indigenous communities . Through a comparison of modern states and traditional societies, Diamond presents a variety of lessons for the individual and the modern state Instead of comparing traditional and state-centered societies through a rational, cultural, or spatial approach, this text utilizes a more comprehensive method that includes all of these aspects . Using this comprehensive comparative method, Diamond elucidates several ethnographic-based conceptions of and lessons about everything from danger, to the treatment of children and the elderly, language, food, dispute resolution, and religion . The significance of this book lies in the vast wealth of anthropologic research and information about how traditional societies interact with their local landscape The lessons provided may be useful for some, but Diamond's take-it-or-leave-it attitude towards changing individual and state perceptions toward the previously-mentioned issues undermines his perceived emphasis on the significance of the information impartedEconomic anthropologists and historical geographers may find Diamond's discussion of traditional forms of trade and subsequent implications for the contemporary global economy interesting Relationships between societies are categorized in four distinct ways: defending boundaries, sharing resources, making war, and trading. Looking at the link between trade, goods, social networks, and class, Diamond identifies two critical similarities between traditional and modern state trade: the gathering of items to confer status, and in some cases, the exchange of some type of currency. For this purpose, Diamond attempts to organize a list of the following items commonly traded in the traditional societies he studies: "necessities" (raw materials and manufactured items), "gray," and "luxury" categories (68-69) . His chart separates items that are immediately useful for survival and daily life from an intermediate category and luxury category The intermediate level comprises items that are both useful and impart some amount of status that make them valuable beyond their utility Luxuries or decorative items, meanwhile, are those that are not immediately useful for survival This three-part typology is useful in cataloguing items of trade, but also in identifying levels of socio-economic class, allowing one to make comparisons with market economies . Despite the usefulness of this typology in organizing goods and their socio-economic implications, Diamond argues that it is unreasonable to categorize items of trade by relegating them to luxury or functional statuses because these definitions are often relative and culturally-specific. …
直到昨天的世界:我们能从传统社会中学到什么?
直到昨天的世界:我们能从传统社会中学到什么?杰瑞德·戴蒙德著,纽约:企鹅集团,2012。Vii + 499pp。表格,数字,进一步阅读,索引和插图学分。$23.59,(布)ISBN 978-0-670-02481-0;16.20美元,(纸质)ISBN 978-1-101-60600-1。在他最近的一本书中,贾里德·戴蒙德提供了一系列从几十年来在空间和文化上不同的土著社区的实地研究中收集到的经验教训。通过对现代国家和传统社会的比较,戴蒙德为个人和现代国家提供了各种教训,而不是通过理性,文化或空间的方法来比较传统社会和以国家为中心的社会,本文采用了一种更全面的方法,包括所有这些方面。利用这种综合的比较方法,戴蒙德阐明了几个基于民族志的概念和教训,从危险到对待儿童和老人、语言、食物、争端解决和宗教。这本书的意义在于丰富的人类学研究和关于传统社会如何与当地景观相互作用的信息,提供的经验教训可能对一些人有用,但是,戴蒙德对于改变个人和国家对前面提到的问题的看法所采取的不接受或不接受的态度,削弱了他对所提供信息的重要性的强调。经济人类学家和历史地理学家可能会发现戴蒙德对传统贸易形式及其对当代全球经济的后续影响的讨论很有趣。保卫边界,共享资源,发动战争,进行贸易。在考察贸易、商品、社会网络和阶级之间的联系时,戴蒙德指出了传统和现代国家贸易之间的两个关键相似之处:收集物品以授予地位,在某些情况下,交换某种类型的货币。为了达到这个目的,戴蒙德试图组织一个他所研究的传统社会中通常交易的物品清单:“必需品”(原材料和制成品)、“灰色”和“奢侈品”类别(68-69)。他的图表将对生存和日常生活立即有用的物品从中间类别和奢侈品类别中分离出来,中间类别包括既有用又赋予一定程度的地位,使其超越其效用而变得有价值的物品,奢侈品或装饰性物品,同时,是那些对生存没有立即有用的物品。这三部分的类型学不仅有助于对贸易物品进行分类,而且有助于识别社会经济阶层的水平。允许人们与市场经济进行比较。尽管这种类型学在组织商品及其社会经济影响方面很有用,但戴蒙德认为,通过将商品归类为奢侈品或功能状态是不合理的,因为这些定义通常是相对的,并且具有文化特异性。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书