On the public danger of illegal access to computer information

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
A. Antonov, E. Zorina, Dmitry V. Kryukov
{"title":"On the public danger of illegal access to computer information","authors":"A. Antonov, E. Zorina, Dmitry V. Kryukov","doi":"10.17223/22253513/44/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the public danger of unauthorised access to computer information, including the nature of the damage caused by such an act to social relations and the threat of its infliction. The authors of the article consider that consequences of illegal access to computer information, such as copying, blocking, modification or destruction are not always socially dangerous. Public danger of this crime lies in its \"cumulative effect\" - its ability to cause damage to other objects of criminal protection. At the same time, the nature and degree of social danger of encroaching on information does not depend on the fact that it is in electronic form, but on its content and value. The authors conducted a sociological survey, according to which a significant proportion of the population recognises the danger of computer crimes as insignificant. The analysis of judicial practice reveals that the harm caused by such crimes is, in most cases, insignificant. The negative consequences for the convicted person, expressed in the imposition of a real sentence and a criminal record, are disproportionate to the extent of the harm caused. This raises doubts as to the validity of the criminalisation of the act under Article 272 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Public danger of the crime provided for by part 1 of article 272 of the Criminal Code of the RF consists in the ability to cause harm to public relations and in the threat of committing other crimes. Therefore, we refer it to the crimes of cumulative danger, public danger of which increases due to the cumulative effect - the potential probability of causing harm to other objects of criminal-legal protection. In this case, the considered crimes will have public danger in case of infliction of substantial harm to public relations, which, in fact, causes its further development. In such circumstances, there are reasonable doubts as to whether the criminalization of the deed stipulated by part 1 of article 272 of the Criminal Code of the RF as an independent crime is justified. At the same time, if we refer to the Code on Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, in it can be found such unlawful acts, the public danger of which is more obvious. These include, for example, violation of sanitary and epidemiological requirements for drinking water, as well as drinking and domestic water supply (article 6.5), concealment by a person suffering from HIV or venereal disease of the source of infection (article 6.1), non-compliance with the rules and regulations on prevention and liquidation of emergency situations (article 20.6). The authors declare no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":41435,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/44/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the public danger of unauthorised access to computer information, including the nature of the damage caused by such an act to social relations and the threat of its infliction. The authors of the article consider that consequences of illegal access to computer information, such as copying, blocking, modification or destruction are not always socially dangerous. Public danger of this crime lies in its "cumulative effect" - its ability to cause damage to other objects of criminal protection. At the same time, the nature and degree of social danger of encroaching on information does not depend on the fact that it is in electronic form, but on its content and value. The authors conducted a sociological survey, according to which a significant proportion of the population recognises the danger of computer crimes as insignificant. The analysis of judicial practice reveals that the harm caused by such crimes is, in most cases, insignificant. The negative consequences for the convicted person, expressed in the imposition of a real sentence and a criminal record, are disproportionate to the extent of the harm caused. This raises doubts as to the validity of the criminalisation of the act under Article 272 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Public danger of the crime provided for by part 1 of article 272 of the Criminal Code of the RF consists in the ability to cause harm to public relations and in the threat of committing other crimes. Therefore, we refer it to the crimes of cumulative danger, public danger of which increases due to the cumulative effect - the potential probability of causing harm to other objects of criminal-legal protection. In this case, the considered crimes will have public danger in case of infliction of substantial harm to public relations, which, in fact, causes its further development. In such circumstances, there are reasonable doubts as to whether the criminalization of the deed stipulated by part 1 of article 272 of the Criminal Code of the RF as an independent crime is justified. At the same time, if we refer to the Code on Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, in it can be found such unlawful acts, the public danger of which is more obvious. These include, for example, violation of sanitary and epidemiological requirements for drinking water, as well as drinking and domestic water supply (article 6.5), concealment by a person suffering from HIV or venereal disease of the source of infection (article 6.1), non-compliance with the rules and regulations on prevention and liquidation of emergency situations (article 20.6). The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
论非法获取计算机信息的公害
这篇文章审查了未经授权获取计算机信息的公共危险,包括这种行为对社会关系造成损害的性质及其造成的威胁。这篇文章的作者认为,非法获取计算机信息的后果,如复制、封锁、修改或破坏,并不总是具有社会危险性。这种罪行的公共危险在于它的“累积效应”- -它能够对其他刑事保护对象造成损害。同时,侵犯信息的社会危险性的性质和程度并不取决于信息是否电子化,而是取决于信息的内容和价值。作者进行了一项社会学调查,根据该调查,相当大比例的人认为计算机犯罪的危险微不足道。司法实践分析表明,此类犯罪所造成的危害在大多数情况下微不足道。对被定罪者所造成的负面后果,表现在实际判决和犯罪记录上,与所造成的伤害程度不成比例。这使人怀疑根据《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第272条将该行为定为刑事犯罪的有效性。《联邦共和国刑法》第272条第1部分所规定的罪行的公共危险包括有能力对公共关系造成损害和有可能犯下其他罪行。因此,我们将其称为累加危险犯罪,即由于累加效应——对其他刑事法律保护对象造成潜在危害的可能性而使公害性增加的犯罪。在这种情况下,所考虑的犯罪在对公共关系造成实质性损害的情况下将具有公共危险性,这实际上导致了其进一步发展。在这种情况下,对于将《联邦共和国刑法》第272条第1部分规定的行为定为刑事犯罪作为一项独立罪行是否合理,存在着合理的怀疑。同时,如果我们参考《俄罗斯联邦行政犯罪法》,就可以发现这种非法行为,其公共危险更为明显。这些行为包括,例如,违反饮用水以及饮用水和生活用水的卫生和流行病要求(第6.5条),感染艾滋病毒或性病的人隐瞒感染源(第6.1条),不遵守关于预防和结束紧急情况的规则和条例(第20.6条)。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信