SPECIFIC RELEASE OF JUDGES REMOVAL: GENERAL THEORETICAL CHARACTERISTICS

D. Tkachenko
{"title":"SPECIFIC RELEASE OF JUDGES REMOVAL: GENERAL THEORETICAL CHARACTERISTICS","authors":"D. Tkachenko","doi":"10.37440/soclaw.2019.01.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article the specifics of the removal of judges from office are clarified. The essence of this legal category is revealed. The general theoretical description of removal of judges from office is given. \nThe author points out that the notion of \"removal\" is more focused on the science of labor law (on dismissal) or criminal procedural law (on preventive measures such as removal from office and temporary removal of a judge from the administration of justice). The current legislation does not operate on the separate concept of “removal of judges”. Today, it is used in the context of such a measure of legal influence as \"temporarily removing a judge from the administration of justice.\" For the term \"justice\", its definition is also not provided at the level of law, and in theory there is no common understanding. \nIn addition, at the level of the Basic Law, the terms \"legal dispute\" and \"criminal prosecution\" are considered as two different categories that are not covered by each other, which is logical in terms of the substantive load of these concepts. \nIt is worth noting that the term \"removal of a judge from the administration of justice\" is used in the law with the adverb \"temporary\", despite the fact that the very concept of \"removal\" already sees its temporary character - this phenomenon exists before certain conditions arise, after the onset of which it exhausts itself.","PeriodicalId":82482,"journal":{"name":"Review of socialist law","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of socialist law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37440/soclaw.2019.01.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article the specifics of the removal of judges from office are clarified. The essence of this legal category is revealed. The general theoretical description of removal of judges from office is given. The author points out that the notion of "removal" is more focused on the science of labor law (on dismissal) or criminal procedural law (on preventive measures such as removal from office and temporary removal of a judge from the administration of justice). The current legislation does not operate on the separate concept of “removal of judges”. Today, it is used in the context of such a measure of legal influence as "temporarily removing a judge from the administration of justice." For the term "justice", its definition is also not provided at the level of law, and in theory there is no common understanding. In addition, at the level of the Basic Law, the terms "legal dispute" and "criminal prosecution" are considered as two different categories that are not covered by each other, which is logical in terms of the substantive load of these concepts. It is worth noting that the term "removal of a judge from the administration of justice" is used in the law with the adverb "temporary", despite the fact that the very concept of "removal" already sees its temporary character - this phenomenon exists before certain conditions arise, after the onset of which it exhausts itself.
法官免职的具体释放:一般理论特征
文章对法官免职的具体情况作了澄清。揭示了这一法律范畴的本质。对法官免职问题进行了一般性的理论描述。作者指出,“免职”的概念更侧重于劳动法的科学(关于解雇)或刑事诉讼法的科学(关于法官的免职和临时免职等预防措施)。目前的立法并不适用“撤职法官”的单独概念。今天,它被用于衡量法律影响的情况,如“暂时将法官从司法行政中除名”。对于“正义”一词,其定义在法律层面上也没有规定,理论上也没有共同的理解。此外,在《基本法》层面,“法律纠纷”和“刑事检控”被视为两个不同的类别,彼此不涵盖,就这两个概念的实质负荷而言,这是合乎逻辑的。值得注意的是,法律中“将法官免职”一词同副词“暂时”一起使用,尽管事实上“免职”这一概念本身已经具有暂时的性质- -这种现象在某些条件出现之前就存在,在出现之后就会耗尽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书