Yield and profitability responses of cowpea to cropping systems and sowing seasons in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia State, Brazil

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
Josué Júnior Novaes Ladeia Fogaça, P. Cairo, A. Cardoso, A. R. São José, Ramon Correia de Vasconcelos, Ubiratan de Oliveira Souza, Renan Thiago Carneiro Nunes
{"title":"Yield and profitability responses of cowpea to cropping systems and sowing seasons in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia State, Brazil","authors":"Josué Júnior Novaes Ladeia Fogaça, P. Cairo, A. Cardoso, A. R. São José, Ramon Correia de Vasconcelos, Ubiratan de Oliveira Souza, Renan Thiago Carneiro Nunes","doi":"10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.53467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops produce a poor yield in northeastern Brazil compared to the other regions. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of irrigated cropping systems and sowing seasons on cowpea yield and profitability in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. Field studies were performed in four experiments during the rainy and dry seasons during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018, which denoted harvests 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. A randomized block design was used for each experiment with four replicates and the following treatments for cropping systems: (1) manual weeding; (2) liming and manual weeding; (3) liming and phosphorus (P) fertilization at sowing, nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) topdressing fertilization, and chemical weed control; (4) liming and P fertilization at sowing, K topdressing fertilization, rhizobia inoculation, and chemical weed control; (5) liming and P fertilization at sowing, N and K topdressing fertilization, rhizobia inoculation, and chemical weed control; and (6) seed pretreatment with cobalt (Co) and molybdenum (Mo), liming and P fertilization at sowing, N and K topdressing fertilization, rhizobia inoculation, and chemical weed control. The technology added to cropping systems increased the number of pods per plant, pod length, seeds per pod, and 100-seed weight, irrespective of the rainy or dry sowing season. Economic analysis, in turn, showed that the technology decreased the total operating cost despite increasing the cost of mechanical operations, inputs, and materials because of the replacement of manual weeding by chemical weed control. However, these costs were not influenced by the sowing seasons. We concluded that technologically enhanced cropping systems, especially systems 4 and 6, improved grain yield and provided greater profitability, which translated into improved economic benefits for farmers. Conversely, the sowing season influenced profitability, which was higher for dry season harvests, when there was less product offered and prices became higher.","PeriodicalId":56373,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.53467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops produce a poor yield in northeastern Brazil compared to the other regions. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of irrigated cropping systems and sowing seasons on cowpea yield and profitability in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. Field studies were performed in four experiments during the rainy and dry seasons during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018, which denoted harvests 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. A randomized block design was used for each experiment with four replicates and the following treatments for cropping systems: (1) manual weeding; (2) liming and manual weeding; (3) liming and phosphorus (P) fertilization at sowing, nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) topdressing fertilization, and chemical weed control; (4) liming and P fertilization at sowing, K topdressing fertilization, rhizobia inoculation, and chemical weed control; (5) liming and P fertilization at sowing, N and K topdressing fertilization, rhizobia inoculation, and chemical weed control; and (6) seed pretreatment with cobalt (Co) and molybdenum (Mo), liming and P fertilization at sowing, N and K topdressing fertilization, rhizobia inoculation, and chemical weed control. The technology added to cropping systems increased the number of pods per plant, pod length, seeds per pod, and 100-seed weight, irrespective of the rainy or dry sowing season. Economic analysis, in turn, showed that the technology decreased the total operating cost despite increasing the cost of mechanical operations, inputs, and materials because of the replacement of manual weeding by chemical weed control. However, these costs were not influenced by the sowing seasons. We concluded that technologically enhanced cropping systems, especially systems 4 and 6, improved grain yield and provided greater profitability, which translated into improved economic benefits for farmers. Conversely, the sowing season influenced profitability, which was higher for dry season harvests, when there was less product offered and prices became higher.
巴西巴伊亚州Vitória da Conquista地区豇豆产量和盈利能力对种植制度和播种季节的响应
与其他地区相比,巴西东北部的豇豆(Vigna unguiculata)产量较低。本研究的目的是评估灌溉种植制度和播种季节对巴西巴伊亚州Vitória da Conquista地区豇豆产量和盈利能力的影响。在2016/2017年和2017/2018年雨季和旱季进行了4个试验,分别为第1、2、3和4个收获季。每个试验采用随机区组设计,设4个重复,种植制度处理如下:(1)人工除草;(2)石灰和人工除草;(3)播种时施石灰和磷肥,施氮、钾追肥,化学除草;(4)播期施石灰、施磷肥,追肥钾,接种根瘤菌,化学除草;(5)播期施石灰、施磷肥,追肥N、K,接种根瘤菌,化学除草;(6)采用钴(Co)和钼(Mo)预处理种子,播期施石灰和磷肥,追肥N和K,接种根瘤菌,化学除草。在种植系统中增加的技术增加了每株荚果的数量、荚果长度、每粒荚果的种子数和100粒种子的重量,而不受雨季或旱季播种的影响。经济分析表明,尽管化学除草取代了人工除草,增加了机械作业、投入和材料的成本,但该技术降低了总作业成本。然而,这些成本不受播种季节的影响。我们的结论是,技术改良的种植系统,特别是系统4和系统6,提高了粮食产量并提供了更高的盈利能力,这转化为农民的经济效益。相反,播种季节会影响盈利能力,旱季收成的盈利能力更高,因为此时提供的产品更少,价格更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy. Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original articles in all areas of Agronomy, including soil sciences, agricultural entomology, soil fertility and manuring, soil physics, physiology of cultivated plants, phytopathology, phyto-health, phytotechny, genesis, morphology and soil classification, management and conservation of soil, integrated management of plant pests, vegetal improvement, agricultural microbiology, agricultural parasitology, production and processing of seeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信