Software project estimation using smooth curve methods and variable selection and regularization methods using a wedge-shape form database

F. Valdés-Souto, Lizbeth Naranjo-Albarrán
{"title":"Software project estimation using smooth curve methods and variable selection and regularization methods using a wedge-shape form database","authors":"F. Valdés-Souto, Lizbeth Naranjo-Albarrán","doi":"10.15514/ispras-2023-35(1)-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The impact of an excellent estimation in planning, budgeting, and control, makes the estimation activities an essential element for the software project success. Several estimation techniques have been developed during the last seven decades. Traditional regression-based is the most often estimation method used in the literature. The generation of models needs a reference database, which is usually a wedge-shaped dataset when real projects are considered. The use of regression-based estimation techniques provides low accuracy with this type of database. Objective: Evaluate and provide an alternative to the general practice of using regression-based models, looking if smooth curve methods and variable selection and regularization methods provide better reliability of the estimations based on the wedge-shaped form databases. Method: A previous study used a reference database with a wedge-shaped form to build a regression-based estimating model. This paper utilizes smooth curve methods and variable selection and regularization methods to build estimation models, providing an alternative to linear regression models. Results: The results show the improvement in the estimation results when smooth curve methods and variable selection and regularization methods are used against regression-based models when wedge-shaped form databases are considered. For example, GAM with all the variables show that the R-squared is for Effort: 0.6864 and for Cost: 0.7581; the MMRE is for Effort: 0.1095 and for Cost: 0.0578. The results for the GAM with LASSO show that the R-squared is for Effort: 0.6836 and for Cost: 0.7519; the MMRE is for Effort: 0.1105 and for Cost: 0.0585. In comparison to the R-squared is for Effort: 0.6790 and for Cost: 0.7540; the MMRE is for Effort: 0.1107 and for Cost: 0.0582 while using MLR.","PeriodicalId":33459,"journal":{"name":"Trudy Instituta sistemnogo programmirovaniia RAN","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trudy Instituta sistemnogo programmirovaniia RAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15514/ispras-2023-35(1)-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The impact of an excellent estimation in planning, budgeting, and control, makes the estimation activities an essential element for the software project success. Several estimation techniques have been developed during the last seven decades. Traditional regression-based is the most often estimation method used in the literature. The generation of models needs a reference database, which is usually a wedge-shaped dataset when real projects are considered. The use of regression-based estimation techniques provides low accuracy with this type of database. Objective: Evaluate and provide an alternative to the general practice of using regression-based models, looking if smooth curve methods and variable selection and regularization methods provide better reliability of the estimations based on the wedge-shaped form databases. Method: A previous study used a reference database with a wedge-shaped form to build a regression-based estimating model. This paper utilizes smooth curve methods and variable selection and regularization methods to build estimation models, providing an alternative to linear regression models. Results: The results show the improvement in the estimation results when smooth curve methods and variable selection and regularization methods are used against regression-based models when wedge-shaped form databases are considered. For example, GAM with all the variables show that the R-squared is for Effort: 0.6864 and for Cost: 0.7581; the MMRE is for Effort: 0.1095 and for Cost: 0.0578. The results for the GAM with LASSO show that the R-squared is for Effort: 0.6836 and for Cost: 0.7519; the MMRE is for Effort: 0.1105 and for Cost: 0.0585. In comparison to the R-squared is for Effort: 0.6790 and for Cost: 0.7540; the MMRE is for Effort: 0.1107 and for Cost: 0.0582 while using MLR.
软件项目估算采用光滑曲线法,变量选择和正则化方法采用楔形形式的数据库
环境:在计划、预算和控制方面的优秀评估的影响,使评估活动成为软件项目成功的基本要素。在过去的七十年中,已经开发了几种评估技术。传统的基于回归的估计方法是文献中最常用的估计方法。模型的生成需要参考数据库,而在实际工程中,参考数据库通常是一个楔形数据集。使用基于回归的估计技术对这种类型的数据库提供了较低的准确性。目的:评估并提供一种替代基于回归模型的一般做法,看看平滑曲线方法和变量选择和正则化方法是否能提供更好的基于楔形数据库的估计可靠性。方法:前人利用楔形参考数据库建立基于回归的估计模型。本文利用光滑曲线方法和变量选择和正则化方法建立估计模型,为线性回归模型提供了一种替代方法。结果:在考虑楔形数据库的情况下,采用光滑曲线方法和变量选择与正则化方法对基于回归的模型的估计结果有所改善。例如,带有所有变量的GAM显示,努力的r平方为0.6864,成本的r平方为0.7581;MMRE的努力值为0.1095,成本为0.0578。用LASSO进行GAM计算的结果表明:努力的r平方为0.6836,成本的r平方为0.7519;MMRE为:0.1105,成本为:0.0585。相比之下,努力的r平方为0.6790,成本的r平方为0.7540;在使用MLR时,MMRE的工作量为0.1107,成本为0.0582。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信