RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE (RAC): A viable solution for sustainable construction

Q4 Engineering
R. Y. Tenzin, Leki Drakpa, Tashi Deki, Sharda Subba, C. Norbu, Pema Kuenchap, Chimmi
{"title":"RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE (RAC): A viable solution for sustainable construction","authors":"R. Y. Tenzin, Leki Drakpa, Tashi Deki, Sharda Subba, C. Norbu, Pema Kuenchap, Chimmi","doi":"10.54417/jaetm.v3i1.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction activities are booming in and around the cities with development and modernization. As a result of these constructions, natural aggregates are being extracted. Simultaneously, there is a significant amount of construction and demolition waste (CDW) generated due to the demolition of structures either due to the structure attaining service life or fashion and the ongoing trend of reconstruction. Therefore, recycling coarse aggregate from CDW in concrete is one of the sustainable solutions to prevent a serious threat to the environment due to the extraction of virgin aggregates and landfilling. This paper presents the results of a study undertaken to examine the influence of recycled concrete aggregate on the properties of new concrete and its life cycle cost (LCC) analysis. It is clear from the test that the strength of RAC is much lowered than natural aggregate concrete (NAC). In order to achieve the optimum strength, the natural aggregate is replaced by recycled aggregate within a range of 0% to 100%, in intervals of 10%. Additionally, to enhance its strength further, reinforcing RAC with new and recycled polypropylene (PP) fiber is done in percentages ranging from 0.25% to 2% by weight of cement with an interval of 0.25%. For analysis, compression, and split tensile strength tests were performed at the end of 28 days of the curing period. The result revealed that 40% replacement of natural aggregate with recycled aggregate achieves the ideal percentage replacement without compromising the strength. Moreover, incorporating 1.5% of new PP fiber or 1.25% of recycled PP fiber in the RAC provides optimum strength. For LCC analysis, the initial investment cost, operations, and maintenance cost, and salvage cost of all the alternatives are compared. Through this analysis, it was determined that the LCC of concrete manufactured using recycled aggregate as concrete ingredients is the lowest. Consequently, incorporating recycled aggregates in concrete production reduces the LCC compared to using natural aggregates.","PeriodicalId":38544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54417/jaetm.v3i1.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction activities are booming in and around the cities with development and modernization. As a result of these constructions, natural aggregates are being extracted. Simultaneously, there is a significant amount of construction and demolition waste (CDW) generated due to the demolition of structures either due to the structure attaining service life or fashion and the ongoing trend of reconstruction. Therefore, recycling coarse aggregate from CDW in concrete is one of the sustainable solutions to prevent a serious threat to the environment due to the extraction of virgin aggregates and landfilling. This paper presents the results of a study undertaken to examine the influence of recycled concrete aggregate on the properties of new concrete and its life cycle cost (LCC) analysis. It is clear from the test that the strength of RAC is much lowered than natural aggregate concrete (NAC). In order to achieve the optimum strength, the natural aggregate is replaced by recycled aggregate within a range of 0% to 100%, in intervals of 10%. Additionally, to enhance its strength further, reinforcing RAC with new and recycled polypropylene (PP) fiber is done in percentages ranging from 0.25% to 2% by weight of cement with an interval of 0.25%. For analysis, compression, and split tensile strength tests were performed at the end of 28 days of the curing period. The result revealed that 40% replacement of natural aggregate with recycled aggregate achieves the ideal percentage replacement without compromising the strength. Moreover, incorporating 1.5% of new PP fiber or 1.25% of recycled PP fiber in the RAC provides optimum strength. For LCC analysis, the initial investment cost, operations, and maintenance cost, and salvage cost of all the alternatives are compared. Through this analysis, it was determined that the LCC of concrete manufactured using recycled aggregate as concrete ingredients is the lowest. Consequently, incorporating recycled aggregates in concrete production reduces the LCC compared to using natural aggregates.
再生骨料混凝土(RAC):可持续建筑的可行解决方案
随着城市的发展和现代化,城市内外的建筑活动日益活跃。由于这些结构,自然聚集体被提取出来。同时,由于结构达到使用寿命或式样以及正在进行的重建趋势,由于结构的拆除而产生了大量的建筑和拆除废物。因此,从混凝土中的CDW中回收粗骨料是一种可持续的解决方案,可以防止因提取原始骨料和填埋而对环境造成严重威胁。本文介绍了一项研究的结果,以检查再生混凝土骨料对新混凝土性能的影响及其生命周期成本(LCC)分析。试验结果表明,RAC的强度明显低于天然骨料混凝土(NAC)。为了达到最佳强度,在0% ~ 100%的范围内,以10%的间隔用再生骨料代替天然骨料。此外,为了进一步增强RAC的强度,新聚丙烯和再生聚丙烯(PP)纤维的补强比例为水泥重量的0.25% - 2%,间隔为0.25%。为了进行分析,在28天的养护期结束时进行了压缩和劈裂拉伸强度测试。结果表明,在不影响强度的情况下,再生骨料替代天然骨料40%达到了理想的替代比例。此外,在RAC中加入1.5%的新PP纤维或1.25%的再生PP纤维可提供最佳强度。在LCC分析中,比较了所有备选方案的初始投资成本、运营维护成本和打捞成本。通过分析,确定以再生骨料为混凝土原料的混凝土LCC最低。因此,与使用天然骨料相比,在混凝土生产中加入再生骨料可以降低LCC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信