Mathematical formation and analysis of COVID-19 pool tests strategies

Q3 Mathematics
Sushmita Chandel, Gaurav Bhatnagar, Krishna Pratap Singh
{"title":"Mathematical formation and analysis of COVID-19 pool tests strategies","authors":"Sushmita Chandel, Gaurav Bhatnagar, Krishna Pratap Singh","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-87411/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The excessive spread of the pandemic COVID-19 around the globe has put mankind at risk. The medical infrastructure and resources are frazzled, even for the world's top economies, due to the large COVID-19 infection. To cope up with this situation, countries are exploring the pool test strategies. In this paper, a detailed analysis has been done to explore the efficient pooling strategies. Given a population and the known fact that the percentage of people infected by the virus, the minimum number of tests to identify COVID-19 positive cases from the entire population are found. In this paper, the problem is formulated with an objective to find a minimum number of tests in the worst case where exactly one positive sample is there in a pool which can happen considering the fact that the groups are formed by choosing samples randomly. Therefore, the thrust stress is on minimizing the total number of tests by finding varying pool sizes at different levels (not necessarily same size at all levels), although levels can also be controlled. Methods Initially the problem is formulated as an optimization problem and there is no constraint on the number of levels upto which pooling can be done. Finding an analytical solution of the problem was challenging and thus the approximate solution was obtained and analyzed. Further, it is observed that many times it is pertinent to put a constraint on the number of levels upto which pooling can be done and thus optimizing with such a constraint is also done using genetic algorithm. Results An empirical evaluation on both realistic and synthetic examples is done to show the efficiency of the procedures and for lower values of percentage infection, the total number of tests are very much less than the population size. Further, the findings of this study show that the general COVID-19 pool test gives the better solution for a small infection while as the value of infection becomes significant the single COVID-19 pool test gives better results. Conclusions This paper illustrates the formation and analysis of polling strategies, which can be opted for the better utilization of the resources. Two different pooling strategies are proposed and these strategies yield accurate insight considering the worst case scenario. The analysis finds that the proposed bounds can be efficiently exploited to ascertain the pool testing in view of the COVID-19 infection rate.","PeriodicalId":37999,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-87411/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The excessive spread of the pandemic COVID-19 around the globe has put mankind at risk. The medical infrastructure and resources are frazzled, even for the world's top economies, due to the large COVID-19 infection. To cope up with this situation, countries are exploring the pool test strategies. In this paper, a detailed analysis has been done to explore the efficient pooling strategies. Given a population and the known fact that the percentage of people infected by the virus, the minimum number of tests to identify COVID-19 positive cases from the entire population are found. In this paper, the problem is formulated with an objective to find a minimum number of tests in the worst case where exactly one positive sample is there in a pool which can happen considering the fact that the groups are formed by choosing samples randomly. Therefore, the thrust stress is on minimizing the total number of tests by finding varying pool sizes at different levels (not necessarily same size at all levels), although levels can also be controlled. Methods Initially the problem is formulated as an optimization problem and there is no constraint on the number of levels upto which pooling can be done. Finding an analytical solution of the problem was challenging and thus the approximate solution was obtained and analyzed. Further, it is observed that many times it is pertinent to put a constraint on the number of levels upto which pooling can be done and thus optimizing with such a constraint is also done using genetic algorithm. Results An empirical evaluation on both realistic and synthetic examples is done to show the efficiency of the procedures and for lower values of percentage infection, the total number of tests are very much less than the population size. Further, the findings of this study show that the general COVID-19 pool test gives the better solution for a small infection while as the value of infection becomes significant the single COVID-19 pool test gives better results. Conclusions This paper illustrates the formation and analysis of polling strategies, which can be opted for the better utilization of the resources. Two different pooling strategies are proposed and these strategies yield accurate insight considering the worst case scenario. The analysis finds that the proposed bounds can be efficiently exploited to ascertain the pool testing in view of the COVID-19 infection rate.
COVID-19池测试策略的数学形成与分析
当前,新冠肺炎疫情在全球范围内过度蔓延,危及人类健康。由于COVID-19的大规模感染,即使是世界顶级经济体,医疗基础设施和资源也已经疲惫不堪。为了应对这种情况,各国正在探索池试战略。本文对高效池化策略进行了详细的分析。鉴于人口和已知的感染病毒的人口百分比,从整个人口中发现COVID-19阳性病例的最低检测次数。在本文中,该问题的目标是在考虑到群体是通过随机选择样本形成的事实下,在池中恰好有一个阳性样本的最坏情况下找到最小测试次数。因此,重点在于通过在不同级别上找到不同的池大小(不一定在所有级别上都是相同的大小)来最小化测试的总数,尽管级别也是可以控制的。方法最初,该问题被表述为一个优化问题,并且对池化可以完成的层数没有限制。寻找问题的解析解具有挑战性,因此获得了近似解并进行了分析。此外,可以观察到,很多时候对池化可以执行的级别数量施加约束是相关的,因此使用遗传算法也可以使用这种约束进行优化。结果对实际病例和综合病例进行了实证评价,表明了该方法的有效性,并且在感染百分比较低的情况下,检测总数远远小于种群规模。此外,本研究结果表明,对于小感染,综合COVID-19池检测提供了更好的解决方案,而随着感染的价值变得显著,单一COVID-19池检测的结果更好。本文阐述了轮询策略的形成和分析,可以更好地利用资源。提出了两种不同的池化策略,考虑到最坏的情况,这些策略产生了准确的洞察力。分析发现,该边界可以有效地用于确定COVID-19感染率的池检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Methods
Epidemiologic Methods Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Methods (EM) seeks contributions comparable to those of the leading epidemiologic journals, but also invites papers that may be more technical or of greater length than what has traditionally been allowed by journals in epidemiology. Applications and examples with real data to illustrate methodology are strongly encouraged but not required. Topics. genetic epidemiology, infectious disease, pharmaco-epidemiology, ecologic studies, environmental exposures, screening, surveillance, social networks, comparative effectiveness, statistical modeling, causal inference, measurement error, study design, meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信