The Economics of Contemporary Africa

Les Annales
{"title":"The Economics of Contemporary Africa","authors":"Les Annales","doi":"10.1017/S2398568218000134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the social sciences, numbers and figures are at once fascinating and ambiguous. Their validity is often fragile, always open to challenges, but their claim to precision (real or apparent) means that they carry a considerable power of suggestion. Their capacity to order the world thus extends far beyond an academic or scientific framework to form an essential political tool for contemporary societies, as Alain Desrosières has shown. Moreover, their universalization is directly linked to the ever-closer connections established between different parts of the world since the early modern era, followed by the development of international institutions since the end of the Second World War. However, the production of numbers remains an open question, as does their capacity to describe social and economic realities in a reliable way. This is particularly the case when they are applied in a standard fashion to contexts that are profoundly different from those in which they emerged. These difficulties have returned to the forefront of debate thanks to two incisive and provocative books by Morten Jerven, devoted to the production of quantitative data and the use of figures in research on African economies, whether today or in the distant past. The aim of Jerven’s work is to show the weakness of many of the statistics used by development economists. This is particularly the case when it comes to the gross domestic product (GDP) of the anglophone countries of sub-Saharan Africa post-independence (Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia), which Jerven studies at length in order to demonstrate the highly questionable principles underlying its fabrication. Calculation of GDP aggregates very diverse kinds of accounting data, and measuring it is a delicate operation that demands a high degree of caution, even in developed countries with high-performing statistical institutes that can draw on a long and stable tradition. The difficulty is even more pronounced in Africa, where economic and social realities are not only very heterogeneous but 503","PeriodicalId":86691,"journal":{"name":"Annales Nestle [English ed.]","volume":"177 1","pages":"503 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Nestle [English ed.]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2398568218000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the social sciences, numbers and figures are at once fascinating and ambiguous. Their validity is often fragile, always open to challenges, but their claim to precision (real or apparent) means that they carry a considerable power of suggestion. Their capacity to order the world thus extends far beyond an academic or scientific framework to form an essential political tool for contemporary societies, as Alain Desrosières has shown. Moreover, their universalization is directly linked to the ever-closer connections established between different parts of the world since the early modern era, followed by the development of international institutions since the end of the Second World War. However, the production of numbers remains an open question, as does their capacity to describe social and economic realities in a reliable way. This is particularly the case when they are applied in a standard fashion to contexts that are profoundly different from those in which they emerged. These difficulties have returned to the forefront of debate thanks to two incisive and provocative books by Morten Jerven, devoted to the production of quantitative data and the use of figures in research on African economies, whether today or in the distant past. The aim of Jerven’s work is to show the weakness of many of the statistics used by development economists. This is particularly the case when it comes to the gross domestic product (GDP) of the anglophone countries of sub-Saharan Africa post-independence (Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia), which Jerven studies at length in order to demonstrate the highly questionable principles underlying its fabrication. Calculation of GDP aggregates very diverse kinds of accounting data, and measuring it is a delicate operation that demands a high degree of caution, even in developed countries with high-performing statistical institutes that can draw on a long and stable tradition. The difficulty is even more pronounced in Africa, where economic and social realities are not only very heterogeneous but 503
当代非洲经济学
对于社会科学来说,数字和数字既迷人又模棱两可。它们的有效性往往是脆弱的,总是面临挑战,但它们声称的准确性(真实的或表面的)意味着它们具有相当大的暗示力量。因此,正如阿兰·德罗西蒂勒斯(Alain desrosi res)所表明的那样,它们支配世界的能力远远超出了学术或科学框架,成为当代社会必不可少的政治工具。此外,它们的普遍化与近代早期以来世界不同地区之间建立的日益密切的联系以及第二次世界大战结束以来国际机构的发展直接相关。然而,数字的产生仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,它们以可靠的方式描述社会和经济现实的能力也是一个悬而未决的问题。当它们以一种标准的方式应用于与它们出现的环境截然不同的环境时,情况尤其如此。多亏了Morten Jerven的两本精辟而富有煽动性的书,这些困难又重新回到了辩论的前沿。这两本书致力于生产定量数据,并在非洲经济研究中使用数据,无论是在今天还是在遥远的过去。杰文的研究目的是揭示发展经济学家使用的许多统计数据的弱点。当涉及到独立后撒哈拉以南非洲英语国家(博茨瓦纳、加纳、肯尼亚、马拉维、尼日利亚、坦桑尼亚、乌干达、赞比亚)的国内生产总值(GDP)时,情况尤其如此。杰文对这些国家进行了详细的研究,以证明其捏造背后的高度可疑的原则。GDP的计算汇总了各种各样的会计数据,对其进行测量是一项需要高度谨慎的精细操作,即使在拥有可以利用长期稳定传统的高效统计机构的发达国家也是如此。这一困难在非洲更为明显,那里的经济和社会现实不仅非常不同,而且十分复杂
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信