Efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine/ dexamethasone / carboplatin versus ESHAP protocol in treatment of relapsed/ refractory Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL)

Fatma Abbas, M. A. Abd El Kader, Mohamed M.El-wakil, Ahmad Shaban
{"title":"Efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine/ dexamethasone / carboplatin versus ESHAP protocol in treatment of relapsed/ refractory Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL)","authors":"Fatma Abbas, M. A. Abd El Kader, Mohamed M.El-wakil, Ahmad Shaban","doi":"10.21608/ejmr.2022.238694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Sensitivitytosalvage chemotherapy is one of the strongest predictors of OS and PFS after high-dose therapy with autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ABMT) in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’slymphoma. Consequently, efforts have been focused on developing salvage chemotherapy protocols aiming at improving response rate for this particular group of patients. (6). Response rates to conventional chemotherapy are generally greater than 50%; however, Most NHL patients eventually relapse. Relapse of NHL may occur several months to years after the initial remission; however, the majority of relapses for aggressive patients. Numerous salvage chemotherapy regimens have been used to treat relapsed or refractory DLBCL.The majority are based on agents that demonstrate non cross resistance to those used in primary therapy. Studies on salvage therapy have generally included all patients with aggressive lymphoma and are not restricted to DLBCtechniques(5). An ideal salvage therapy regimen for use prior to ASCT should have a high response rate, low hematologic, andnonhematologictoxicity.(3)","PeriodicalId":11524,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmr.2022.238694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Sensitivitytosalvage chemotherapy is one of the strongest predictors of OS and PFS after high-dose therapy with autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ABMT) in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’slymphoma. Consequently, efforts have been focused on developing salvage chemotherapy protocols aiming at improving response rate for this particular group of patients. (6). Response rates to conventional chemotherapy are generally greater than 50%; however, Most NHL patients eventually relapse. Relapse of NHL may occur several months to years after the initial remission; however, the majority of relapses for aggressive patients. Numerous salvage chemotherapy regimens have been used to treat relapsed or refractory DLBCL.The majority are based on agents that demonstrate non cross resistance to those used in primary therapy. Studies on salvage therapy have generally included all patients with aggressive lymphoma and are not restricted to DLBCtechniques(5). An ideal salvage therapy regimen for use prior to ASCT should have a high response rate, low hematologic, andnonhematologictoxicity.(3)
吉西他滨/地塞米松/卡铂与ESHAP方案治疗复发/难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的疗效和毒性比较
对补救性化疗的敏感性是复发或难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者自体骨髓或外周血干细胞移植(ABMT)大剂量治疗后OS和PFS的最强预测因素之一。因此,人们一直致力于开发挽救性化疗方案,旨在提高这一特殊患者群体的反应率。(6).常规化疗有效率一般大于50%;然而,大多数NHL患者最终会复发。NHL可能在最初缓解后数月至数年复发;然而,大多数复发为侵袭性患者。许多救助性化疗方案已被用于治疗复发或难治性DLBCL。大多数是基于对主要治疗中使用的药物显示无交叉耐药的药物。挽救性治疗的研究通常包括所有侵袭性淋巴瘤患者,并不局限于dlbc技术(5)。ASCT前理想的挽救性治疗方案应具有高反应率、低血液学和非血液学毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信