Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Immunologic Staining in Prostate Cancer

Q3 Medicine
{"title":"Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Immunologic Staining in Prostate Cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.5812/semj-127269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prostatic adenocarcinoma is the second leading cause of death in males due to cancer. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum level is the first marker for screening such patients. Objectives: The present study evaluated the comparison between the degree of staining of the PSA marker and some factors in the prognosis of prostate cancer. Methods: The current cross-sectional study was performed on 97 tissue blocks from patients with prostate adenocarcinoma collected in 2019-2020 from the Pathology Department of Golestan Ahvaz Hospital archives. Clinical information such as age, tumor size, grade of tumor, lymph node involvement, and vascular and perineural invasion was extracted from patients' pathology reports and recorded on a checklist. Then, PSA apical and intensity staining was studied using immunohistochemistry. Results: The mean age of patients was 72.76 ± 8.19 years. The mean serum PSA level was 39.2 ± 8.90. In the present study, the highest PSA staining intensity in the samples was related to grade 1 with a frequency of 39 (40.2%), and then it was related to grade 4 with a frequency of 38 (39.2%), while the lowest frequency of staining intensity was related to grade 2 was with a frequency of 9 (9.3%). Regarding PSA apical staining, 58 samples (59.8%) were positive, and 39 (40.2%) were negative. A statistically significant comparison was shown between Gleason scoring and PSA apical staining (P < 0.001). The results indicate that increasing Gleason scoring decreases the staining intensity, and this correlation is significant (P < 0.05). The mean age in samples with positive staining of apical marker PSA is lower than in samples with negative staining of apical marker PSA but is not statistically significant (P = 0.38). In contrast, the serum level of the PSA marker is statistically significantly higher in samples with positive staining of apical marker PSA than in samples with negative staining of PSA (P < 0.001). According to the Spearman correlation coefficient test, the intensity of staining of the PSA marker decreases with age, and this correlation is significant (P = 0.032). However, according to the Spearman correlation coefficient test, staining intensity increases with increasing serum PSA level, and this correlation is statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: It is also suggested that in future studies with a larger sample size, the comparison between apical marker expression and PSA marker staining intensity with clinicopathological factors, survival and mortality rates, response to treatment, etc., will be evaluated.","PeriodicalId":39157,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-127269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prostatic adenocarcinoma is the second leading cause of death in males due to cancer. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum level is the first marker for screening such patients. Objectives: The present study evaluated the comparison between the degree of staining of the PSA marker and some factors in the prognosis of prostate cancer. Methods: The current cross-sectional study was performed on 97 tissue blocks from patients with prostate adenocarcinoma collected in 2019-2020 from the Pathology Department of Golestan Ahvaz Hospital archives. Clinical information such as age, tumor size, grade of tumor, lymph node involvement, and vascular and perineural invasion was extracted from patients' pathology reports and recorded on a checklist. Then, PSA apical and intensity staining was studied using immunohistochemistry. Results: The mean age of patients was 72.76 ± 8.19 years. The mean serum PSA level was 39.2 ± 8.90. In the present study, the highest PSA staining intensity in the samples was related to grade 1 with a frequency of 39 (40.2%), and then it was related to grade 4 with a frequency of 38 (39.2%), while the lowest frequency of staining intensity was related to grade 2 was with a frequency of 9 (9.3%). Regarding PSA apical staining, 58 samples (59.8%) were positive, and 39 (40.2%) were negative. A statistically significant comparison was shown between Gleason scoring and PSA apical staining (P < 0.001). The results indicate that increasing Gleason scoring decreases the staining intensity, and this correlation is significant (P < 0.05). The mean age in samples with positive staining of apical marker PSA is lower than in samples with negative staining of apical marker PSA but is not statistically significant (P = 0.38). In contrast, the serum level of the PSA marker is statistically significantly higher in samples with positive staining of apical marker PSA than in samples with negative staining of PSA (P < 0.001). According to the Spearman correlation coefficient test, the intensity of staining of the PSA marker decreases with age, and this correlation is significant (P = 0.032). However, according to the Spearman correlation coefficient test, staining intensity increases with increasing serum PSA level, and this correlation is statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: It is also suggested that in future studies with a larger sample size, the comparison between apical marker expression and PSA marker staining intensity with clinicopathological factors, survival and mortality rates, response to treatment, etc., will be evaluated.
前列腺特异性抗原免疫染色在前列腺癌诊断和预后中的作用
背景:前列腺癌是男性癌症死亡的第二大原因。前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)血清水平是筛查此类患者的第一指标。目的:探讨前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)标记物的染色程度与前列腺癌预后的关系。方法:本横断面研究收集了Golestan Ahvaz医院病毒科2019-2020年前列腺癌患者的97个组织块。从患者的病理报告中提取临床信息,如年龄、肿瘤大小、肿瘤分级、淋巴结受累情况以及血管和神经周围的侵犯情况,并记录在检查表上。免疫组织化学法对PSA根尖和强度染色进行研究。结果:患者平均年龄72.76±8.19岁。血清PSA平均值为39.2±8.90。本研究标本中PSA染色强度最高的为1级,频率为39例(40.2%),其次为4级,频率为38例(39.2%),最低的为2级,频率为9例(9.3%)。PSA根尖染色阳性58例(59.8%),阴性39例(40.2%)。Gleason评分与PSA根尖染色比较有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结果表明,Gleason评分越高,染色强度越低,且相关性显著(P < 0.05)。根尖标志物PSA阳性样本的平均年龄低于根尖标志物PSA阴性样本,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.38)。相比之下,PSA根尖标记阳性的样本血清中PSA标志物的水平显著高于PSA阴性的样本(P < 0.001)。根据Spearman相关系数检验,PSA标记物的染色强度随年龄的增长而降低,且相关性显著(P = 0.032)。然而,根据Spearman相关系数检验,随着血清PSA水平的升高,染色强度增加,且相关性有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:还建议在今后更大样本量的研究中,评价根尖标志物表达及PSA标志物染色强度与临床病理因素、生存率、死亡率、治疗反应等的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shiraz E Medical Journal
Shiraz E Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信