{"title":"Politics and perversion (Pier Paolo Pasolini’s de Sade today)","authors":"Oleg Aronson","doi":"10.2298/fid2204860a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to examine Pier Paolo Pasolini?s film Salo, or 120 Days of Sodom, not only as an adaptation of Marquis de Sade?s work, but as a possible response to the problems of modern society, which reanimates fascism, no longer as political ideology, but as a ?natural? form of contemporary human sensibility. Relying on his original ?semiology of reality,? the expression of which is cinema, Pasolini?s film embodies the non-political logic of fascism as the logic of perversion, hidden behind the facade of political ideology. The article shows that Salo consistently contradicts the key principles of cinematic expressiveness of Pasolini?s theory itself, which focuses on moments in which ?reality? reveals itself (acting as life itself). As a result, the film connects the unconnected - the shock of scenes of torture and sexual violence with a cultural allegory that anesthetizes effect of visual violence. For Pasolini, both violence and culture are mechanisms for analyzing the ephemeral substance of power, which inevitably generates some form of fascism and perversion, while de Sade is the discoverer of the basic sensual (plastic) syntagmas of power, embodied in the figure of the libertine. The sadistic libertinage, which combines the idea of freedom and the practice of torture, finds itself at the very heart of contemporary politics, its operative unconscious.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2204860a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article attempts to examine Pier Paolo Pasolini?s film Salo, or 120 Days of Sodom, not only as an adaptation of Marquis de Sade?s work, but as a possible response to the problems of modern society, which reanimates fascism, no longer as political ideology, but as a ?natural? form of contemporary human sensibility. Relying on his original ?semiology of reality,? the expression of which is cinema, Pasolini?s film embodies the non-political logic of fascism as the logic of perversion, hidden behind the facade of political ideology. The article shows that Salo consistently contradicts the key principles of cinematic expressiveness of Pasolini?s theory itself, which focuses on moments in which ?reality? reveals itself (acting as life itself). As a result, the film connects the unconnected - the shock of scenes of torture and sexual violence with a cultural allegory that anesthetizes effect of visual violence. For Pasolini, both violence and culture are mechanisms for analyzing the ephemeral substance of power, which inevitably generates some form of fascism and perversion, while de Sade is the discoverer of the basic sensual (plastic) syntagmas of power, embodied in the figure of the libertine. The sadistic libertinage, which combines the idea of freedom and the practice of torture, finds itself at the very heart of contemporary politics, its operative unconscious.
这篇文章试图考察Pier Paolo Pasolini?《索多玛的120天》(Salo)不仅改编自萨德侯爵(Marquis de Sade)的作品。而是作为对现代社会问题的一种可能的回应,它使法西斯主义复活,不再是政治意识形态,而是一种“自然的”?当代人类情感的形式。依靠他独创的现实符号学,它的表达方式是电影,帕索里尼S电影将法西斯主义的非政治逻辑作为变态的逻辑体现出来,隐藏在政治意识形态的表象之下。本文表明,《萨洛》始终与帕索里尼的电影表现力的关键原则相矛盾。S理论本身,它关注的是现实?显示自己(作为生命本身)。因此,这部电影将不相关的——酷刑和性暴力场景的震惊与一种文化寓言联系起来,这种寓言麻醉了视觉暴力的效果。对于帕索里尼来说,暴力和文化都是分析权力的短暂本质的机制,这不可避免地会产生某种形式的法西斯主义和变态,而萨德则是权力的基本感官(塑料)语法的发现,体现在浪子的形象中。虐待狂式的解放,结合了自由的概念和酷刑的实践,发现自己处于当代政治的核心,它的运作无意识。