Assessment of Safety Valve Escape Pipework

W. Vorster, J. Roy, Daniel G. Gilroy, Jack A. Pollock, David M. Clarkson, A. J. Beveridge, Alistair Strong
{"title":"Assessment of Safety Valve Escape Pipework","authors":"W. Vorster, J. Roy, Daniel G. Gilroy, Jack A. Pollock, David M. Clarkson, A. J. Beveridge, Alistair Strong","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-84858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper discusses fitness for purpose (FfP) structural integrity assessments of Safety Relief valve (SRV) vent pipes that were inadequately designed and maintained. The FfP assessments identified several latent errors with the pipework design. The absence of a fault schedule in combination with the latent errors led to a discernable anomaly in the safety case which was finally address but resulted in long outage delays and spiraling costs due to the large number of assessments, inspections and modifications required to achieve and demonstrate integrity.\n The FfP assessments discussed here consider all failure mechanisms which were identified as being relevant during steam discharge. These include plastic collapse, ratchetting, creep rupture and creep-fatigue and required a series of complex assessments to sentence the SRV pipes for return to service. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), pipe stress analysis and Finite Element Modeling (FEM) required to demonstrate integrity are discussed. The plant modification and repair solutions required to achieve integrity before the pipes could be returned to service are presented. The method used to apply CFD loads to pipe stress models without double accounting for static pressure stresses in the Finite Element Analyses (FEA), is describe here. Novel analysis techniques used to speed up assessments and the historic plant data reviews that were required to substantiate the claims on historic damage are reviewed.","PeriodicalId":23700,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses fitness for purpose (FfP) structural integrity assessments of Safety Relief valve (SRV) vent pipes that were inadequately designed and maintained. The FfP assessments identified several latent errors with the pipework design. The absence of a fault schedule in combination with the latent errors led to a discernable anomaly in the safety case which was finally address but resulted in long outage delays and spiraling costs due to the large number of assessments, inspections and modifications required to achieve and demonstrate integrity. The FfP assessments discussed here consider all failure mechanisms which were identified as being relevant during steam discharge. These include plastic collapse, ratchetting, creep rupture and creep-fatigue and required a series of complex assessments to sentence the SRV pipes for return to service. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), pipe stress analysis and Finite Element Modeling (FEM) required to demonstrate integrity are discussed. The plant modification and repair solutions required to achieve integrity before the pipes could be returned to service are presented. The method used to apply CFD loads to pipe stress models without double accounting for static pressure stresses in the Finite Element Analyses (FEA), is describe here. Novel analysis techniques used to speed up assessments and the historic plant data reviews that were required to substantiate the claims on historic damage are reviewed.
安全阀泄放管道系统评估
本文讨论了设计和维护不充分的安全安全阀(SRV)排气管道的适用性(FfP)结构完整性评估。FfP评估确定了管道设计中的几个潜在错误。由于缺乏故障时间表,再加上潜在的错误,导致了安全案例中明显的异常,最终得到了解决,但由于需要进行大量的评估、检查和修改,导致了长时间的停机延迟和成本上升,以实现和证明完整性。这里讨论的FfP评估考虑了在蒸汽排放过程中被确定为相关的所有失效机制。这些问题包括塑性断裂、棘轮、蠕变断裂和蠕变疲劳,需要进行一系列复杂的评估,以判定SRV管道是否可以重新投入使用。讨论了证明完整性所需的计算流体动力学(CFD)、管道应力分析和有限元建模(FEM)。提出了在管道恢复使用之前实现完整性所需的工厂改造和维修解决方案。本文描述了将CFD载荷应用于管道应力模型而无需在有限元分析(FEA)中双重考虑静压应力的方法。新的分析技术,用于加快评估和历史工厂的数据审查,需要证实历史损害索赔进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信