Prevalence of oral lesions: A multi centered study

Amani Saeed Alshehri
{"title":"Prevalence of oral lesions: A multi centered study","authors":"Amani Saeed Alshehri","doi":"10.4172/2247-2452.C1.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most perplexing aspects of complete denture prosthodontics is the selection of appropriate maxillary anterior denture teeth size, particularly when no pre-extraction records are available. Despite the fact that the use of interalar distance, interpupillary distance, as well as distance between the medialis angles of the eyes are considered, to some extent, a reliable guide for determining the size of the maxillary anterior teeth, the literature on dentistry does not recommend one crucial method. This study is the second part of a series of research papers focusing mainly on the determination of maxillary anterior teeth width for a completely edentulous patient. The aim of the series is to suggest a new methodology for determining the maxillary anterior teeth mesiodistal width, based on certain stable guides that were derived from dentate casts with angle class I arch relationship and normal teeth alignment. These guides include basically the AB (the distance measured from the mesio-incisal angles of the maxillary central incisors along the midline and perpendicular to the intercanine (IC) line) mean distance obtained from the first study, the midline of the palate, and the arch form. (2050) Safa’a A. Asal E.D.J. Vol. 63, No. 2 IC line is 9.88±0.90, 10.55±0.93, and 7.73±0.63 mm for ovoid, tapering and square arch forms respectively with significant differences between the distances and its corresponding arch forms13. Based on the fact that the loss of jaw bone after extraction reduces the size of the middle and lower thirds of the face, which is already reduced by aging as documented in the literature14-19, the Grave et al study reported that the mean distance from the labial surface of maxillary incisors to the posterior border of incisive papilla for the group with artificial teeth is significantly smaller than that for the group with natural teeth20. Hence, the author prefers to define the AB distance at 10 mm, 9 mm, 7 mm for tapering, ovoid and square arch forms respectively.","PeriodicalId":19556,"journal":{"name":"Oral health and dental management","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health and dental management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2247-2452.C1.048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

One of the most perplexing aspects of complete denture prosthodontics is the selection of appropriate maxillary anterior denture teeth size, particularly when no pre-extraction records are available. Despite the fact that the use of interalar distance, interpupillary distance, as well as distance between the medialis angles of the eyes are considered, to some extent, a reliable guide for determining the size of the maxillary anterior teeth, the literature on dentistry does not recommend one crucial method. This study is the second part of a series of research papers focusing mainly on the determination of maxillary anterior teeth width for a completely edentulous patient. The aim of the series is to suggest a new methodology for determining the maxillary anterior teeth mesiodistal width, based on certain stable guides that were derived from dentate casts with angle class I arch relationship and normal teeth alignment. These guides include basically the AB (the distance measured from the mesio-incisal angles of the maxillary central incisors along the midline and perpendicular to the intercanine (IC) line) mean distance obtained from the first study, the midline of the palate, and the arch form. (2050) Safa’a A. Asal E.D.J. Vol. 63, No. 2 IC line is 9.88±0.90, 10.55±0.93, and 7.73±0.63 mm for ovoid, tapering and square arch forms respectively with significant differences between the distances and its corresponding arch forms13. Based on the fact that the loss of jaw bone after extraction reduces the size of the middle and lower thirds of the face, which is already reduced by aging as documented in the literature14-19, the Grave et al study reported that the mean distance from the labial surface of maxillary incisors to the posterior border of incisive papilla for the group with artificial teeth is significantly smaller than that for the group with natural teeth20. Hence, the author prefers to define the AB distance at 10 mm, 9 mm, 7 mm for tapering, ovoid and square arch forms respectively.
口腔病变的患病率:一项多中心研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信