Effects of Chronic Calcium Channel Blockade on Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Hypertension

C. Binggeli, R. Corti, I. Sudano, T. Luscher, G. Noll
{"title":"Effects of Chronic Calcium Channel Blockade on Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Hypertension","authors":"C. Binggeli, R. Corti, I. Sudano, T. Luscher, G. Noll","doi":"10.1161/01.HYP.0000013264.41234.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is an important regulator of the circulation. Its activity is increased in hypertension and heart failure and adversely affects prognosis. Although certain drugs inhibit SNS, dihydropyridine calcium antagonists may stimulate the system. Phenylalkylamine calcium antagonists such as verapamil have a different pharmacological profile. We therefore tested the hypothesis of whether amlodipine, nifedipine, or verapamil differs in the effects on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSA). Forty-three patients (31 men, 12 women) with mild to moderate hypertension were randomly assigned to 1 drug for 8 weeks. Blood pressure, heart rate, and MSA (by microneurography) were measured at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. All calcium antagonists led to a similar decrease in blood pressure of 5.0±1.5 to 6.4±1.4 mm Hg at 8 weeks (P <0.001 versus baseline). There were no significant differences in MSA between groups. With amlodipine, MSA averaged 49±3 bursts/min (3 versus baseline); with nifedipine, 48±3 bursts/min (2 versus baseline); and with verapamil, 49±2 bursts/min (all, P =NS). With verapamil, norepinephrine decreased by 4% but tended to increase by about one third with amlodipine or nifedipine (P =NS). Thus, in hypertension slow release forms of verapamil, nifedipine, and amlodipine exert comparable antihypertensive effects and do not change MSA, although there was a trend toward decreased MSA and plasma norepinephrine with verapamil.","PeriodicalId":13233,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"321 1","pages":"892-896"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000013264.41234.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is an important regulator of the circulation. Its activity is increased in hypertension and heart failure and adversely affects prognosis. Although certain drugs inhibit SNS, dihydropyridine calcium antagonists may stimulate the system. Phenylalkylamine calcium antagonists such as verapamil have a different pharmacological profile. We therefore tested the hypothesis of whether amlodipine, nifedipine, or verapamil differs in the effects on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSA). Forty-three patients (31 men, 12 women) with mild to moderate hypertension were randomly assigned to 1 drug for 8 weeks. Blood pressure, heart rate, and MSA (by microneurography) were measured at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. All calcium antagonists led to a similar decrease in blood pressure of 5.0±1.5 to 6.4±1.4 mm Hg at 8 weeks (P <0.001 versus baseline). There were no significant differences in MSA between groups. With amlodipine, MSA averaged 49±3 bursts/min (3 versus baseline); with nifedipine, 48±3 bursts/min (2 versus baseline); and with verapamil, 49±2 bursts/min (all, P =NS). With verapamil, norepinephrine decreased by 4% but tended to increase by about one third with amlodipine or nifedipine (P =NS). Thus, in hypertension slow release forms of verapamil, nifedipine, and amlodipine exert comparable antihypertensive effects and do not change MSA, although there was a trend toward decreased MSA and plasma norepinephrine with verapamil.
慢性钙通道阻断对高血压交感神经活动的影响
交感神经系统(SNS)是循环的重要调节器。它的活性在高血压和心力衰竭时增加,并对预后产生不利影响。虽然某些药物抑制SNS,但二氢吡啶钙拮抗剂可能刺激该系统。苯烷基胺钙拮抗剂如维拉帕米具有不同的药理学特征。因此,我们测试了氨氯地平、硝苯地平或维拉帕米对肌肉交感神经活动(MSA)的影响是否不同的假设。43例轻中度高血压患者(31名男性,12名女性)随机分配服用1种药物,为期8周。在基线和治疗8周后测量血压、心率和MSA(通过微神经造影)。在8周时,所有钙拮抗剂均导致血压下降5.0±1.5至6.4±1.4 mm Hg(与基线相比P <0.001)。各组间MSA差异无统计学意义。使用氨氯地平,MSA平均为49±3次/分钟(与基线相比为3次);硝苯地平,48±3次/分钟(2次vs基线);维拉帕米组为49±2次/min(均P =NS)。维拉帕米组去甲肾上腺素下降4%,而氨氯地平或硝苯地平组有增加约三分之一的趋势(P =NS)。因此,在高血压缓释形式的维拉帕米、硝苯地平和氨氯地平发挥相当的降压作用,不改变MSA,尽管维拉帕米有降低MSA和血浆去甲肾上腺素的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信