Selection mining methods via multiple criteria decision analysis using TOPSIS and modification of the UBC method

IF 0.7 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mahrous A. M. Ali, Jong-Gwan Kim
{"title":"Selection mining methods via multiple criteria decision analysis using TOPSIS and modification of the UBC method","authors":"Mahrous A. M. Ali, Jong-Gwan Kim","doi":"10.46873/2300-3960.1054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mine designers often face difficulties in selecting an appropriate mining method; however, such a method should be selected based on ore and rock characteristics. The selection of mining methods can be considered a type of multi-criteria decision making, and this depends on many factors used in the selection process. The general method used in this field is the University of British Columbia (UBC) method, which determines the criteria of the properties that are compared to determine the best and worst of several mining methods. In this paper we used as new technique which define as Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The criteria considered in the UBC method include general shape, ore thickness, ore plunge, and grade distribution, beside the rock quality designation (RQD), and the rock substance strength (RSS). This paper presents an improved TOPSIS method based on experimental design. Additionally, this paper will introduce a modified version of the UBC method that can be employed based on Excel sheet. The best mining methods is cut and fill Stoping and Top slicing with the same rank equal 0.72, and the second-best mining method is Square set Stoping with rank equal 0.65.","PeriodicalId":37284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Mine designers often face difficulties in selecting an appropriate mining method; however, such a method should be selected based on ore and rock characteristics. The selection of mining methods can be considered a type of multi-criteria decision making, and this depends on many factors used in the selection process. The general method used in this field is the University of British Columbia (UBC) method, which determines the criteria of the properties that are compared to determine the best and worst of several mining methods. In this paper we used as new technique which define as Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The criteria considered in the UBC method include general shape, ore thickness, ore plunge, and grade distribution, beside the rock quality designation (RQD), and the rock substance strength (RSS). This paper presents an improved TOPSIS method based on experimental design. Additionally, this paper will introduce a modified version of the UBC method that can be employed based on Excel sheet. The best mining methods is cut and fill Stoping and Top slicing with the same rank equal 0.72, and the second-best mining method is Square set Stoping with rank equal 0.65.
基于TOPSIS和改进UBC方法的多准则决策分析选择挖掘方法
矿山设计人员在选择合适的采矿方法时经常面临困难;但是,这种方法应该根据矿石和岩石的特性来选择。采矿方法的选择可以被认为是一种多准则决策,这取决于选择过程中使用的许多因素。该领域使用的一般方法是不列颠哥伦比亚大学(UBC)方法,该方法确定了比较属性的标准,以确定几种采矿方法的最佳和最差。本文采用了一种新技术,即理想解相似偏好排序技术(TOPSIS)。在UBC方法中考虑的标准包括一般形状、矿石厚度、矿石倾角和品位分布,以及岩石质量标识(RQD)和岩石物质强度(RSS)。本文提出了一种基于实验设计的改进TOPSIS方法。此外,本文还将介绍一种基于Excel表格的改进版UBC方法。最佳采矿方法为充填充填法和顶部分层法,采矿等级相同,为0.72;次优采矿方法为方形集采矿,采矿等级为0.65。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sustainable Mining
Journal of Sustainable Mining Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信