PG112 Exploring the influence of trainee attributes on simulation-based mental health training efficacy

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
A. Saunders, Marta Ortega Vega, Hannah Ianelli, C. Attoe, S. Cross
{"title":"PG112 Exploring the influence of trainee attributes on simulation-based mental health training efficacy","authors":"A. Saunders, Marta Ortega Vega, Hannah Ianelli, C. Attoe, S. Cross","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mental health is a growing sector of healthcare, in which patients who suffer untreated experience worse quality of life outcomes and lower life expectancy. In order to achieve the best possible care, training and subsequent evaluation is needed for those who work with patients experiencing mental health difficulties. Research suggests that age has the potential to impact training efficacy, in which older participants are significantly worse at retaining novel training skills compared to their younger counterparts. It has also been suggested that there are differences in preferred learning styles, and thus learning efficacy, between males and females. Thus, this paper sought to investigate these differences within the novel training method of high-fidelity, actor-based mental health simulation training, in order to identify factors that may affect training efficacy and subsequently patient outcomes. 829 participants attended simulation training courses and completed the Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument pre- and post-course. Significant changes in HFSHI scores were found between pre- and post-course data across all participants, suggesting that simulation training can be universally effective as a method of pedagogy. Individuals within the ages of 25–29 reported significantly less mean change in HFSHI scores than those between 35–45. Career stage did not seem to mediate this effect. No differences in HFSHI scores were found across gender. The study concludes that simulation is an innovative training method that is effective across a variety of courses and professions. More research should be conducted to investigate why there may be differences in learning outcomes for different ages in regard to simulation, and to identify any other confounding factors that may influence these results. Reference McManus, S., Bebbington, P., Jenkins, R., & Brugha, T. ( 2016). Mental health and wellbeing in England: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2014. A survey carried out for NHS Digital by NatCen Social Research and the Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester. Reedy, G. B., Lavelle, M., Simpson, T., & Anderson, J. E. ( 2017). Development of the Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument: a valid and reliable tool for assessing interprofessional learning across healthcare practice settings. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning;3(4):135–141.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mental health is a growing sector of healthcare, in which patients who suffer untreated experience worse quality of life outcomes and lower life expectancy. In order to achieve the best possible care, training and subsequent evaluation is needed for those who work with patients experiencing mental health difficulties. Research suggests that age has the potential to impact training efficacy, in which older participants are significantly worse at retaining novel training skills compared to their younger counterparts. It has also been suggested that there are differences in preferred learning styles, and thus learning efficacy, between males and females. Thus, this paper sought to investigate these differences within the novel training method of high-fidelity, actor-based mental health simulation training, in order to identify factors that may affect training efficacy and subsequently patient outcomes. 829 participants attended simulation training courses and completed the Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument pre- and post-course. Significant changes in HFSHI scores were found between pre- and post-course data across all participants, suggesting that simulation training can be universally effective as a method of pedagogy. Individuals within the ages of 25–29 reported significantly less mean change in HFSHI scores than those between 35–45. Career stage did not seem to mediate this effect. No differences in HFSHI scores were found across gender. The study concludes that simulation is an innovative training method that is effective across a variety of courses and professions. More research should be conducted to investigate why there may be differences in learning outcomes for different ages in regard to simulation, and to identify any other confounding factors that may influence these results. Reference McManus, S., Bebbington, P., Jenkins, R., & Brugha, T. ( 2016). Mental health and wellbeing in England: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2014. A survey carried out for NHS Digital by NatCen Social Research and the Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester. Reedy, G. B., Lavelle, M., Simpson, T., & Anderson, J. E. ( 2017). Development of the Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument: a valid and reliable tool for assessing interprofessional learning across healthcare practice settings. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning;3(4):135–141.
PG112探讨学员属性对基于模拟的心理健康培训效果的影响
心理健康是一个日益增长的保健部门,其中未经治疗的患者生活质量较差,预期寿命较低。为了获得尽可能最好的护理,需要对那些与有精神健康困难的病人一起工作的人进行培训和随后的评估。研究表明,年龄可能会影响训练效果,与年轻人相比,年龄较大的参与者在保留新训练技能方面明显更差。研究还表明,男性和女性在偏好的学习方式上也存在差异,因此学习效率也存在差异。因此,本文试图在高保真度、基于行动者的心理健康模拟训练的新训练方法中研究这些差异,以确定可能影响训练效果和随后患者预后的因素。829名参与者参加了模拟培训课程,并完成了医疗器械人为因素技能课程的前后课程。所有参与者的HFSHI分数在课程前和课程后的数据中都有显著变化,这表明模拟训练可以作为一种普遍有效的教学方法。25-29岁的人报告的HFSHI得分的平均变化明显小于35-45岁的人。职业阶段似乎并没有起到中介作用。HFSHI评分在性别上没有差异。该研究得出结论,模拟是一种创新的培训方法,在各种课程和专业中都是有效的。应该进行更多的研究,以调查为什么在模拟方面不同年龄的学习结果可能存在差异,并确定可能影响这些结果的任何其他混杂因素。参考McManus, S., Bebbington, P., Jenkins, R., & Brugha, T.(2016)。英国的心理健康和福祉:2014年成人精神病发病率调查。一项由NatCen社会研究和莱斯特大学健康科学系为NHS Digital进行的调查。Reedy, g.b., Lavelle, M., Simpson, T., and Anderson, j.e.(2017)。开发医疗保健工具的人为因素技能:一个有效和可靠的工具,用于评估跨医疗保健实践设置的跨专业学习。BMJ仿真与技术增强学习;3(4):135-141。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信