Comprehensive Pipeline Record and Inspection Data Review and Assessment in Response to Safety Advisory on Girth Weld Strain-Induced Failures

Craig Arbeau, A. Clyne, A. Bhatia, A. Young
{"title":"Comprehensive Pipeline Record and Inspection Data Review and Assessment in Response to Safety Advisory on Girth Weld Strain-Induced Failures","authors":"Craig Arbeau, A. Clyne, A. Bhatia, A. Young","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent incidents outside Canada prompted the Canadian Energy Regulator (CER), the British Columbia Oil & Gas Commission (BCOGC) and the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to advise pipeline operators regarding the possibility of girth weld strain-induced failures in high strength pipe. In early 2020, the CER issued a Safety Advisory (SA) relating to the possibility of girth weld strain-induced failures in high strength (Grade X 70 or higher) steel line pipe. There was a concern that similar incidents could occur in Canada, given comparable conditions. Furthermore, the SA stated that.... “The CER expects that regulated companies can demonstrate that longitudinal strains resulting from loadings such as those described in Section 4.2.4 of CSA Z662-19 [essentially external loading over and above typical operating loads] have been accounted for in the design, construction and operation of pipelines where strain could potentially accumulate in under-matched girth welds”.\n With respect to the SA, the failure causes were consistently linked to combinations of:\n i) high strength pipe with a minimum tensile strength exceeding actual weld strength values,\n ii) girth weld HAZ softening as a result of the welding process,\n iii) loads applied to the pipeline causing additional longitudinal strain, and\n iv) pipes welded with a standard bevel and alignment of approximately 45° between the heat affected zone (HAZ) and the root bead.\n Emera New Brunswick (Emera) initiated an assessment of the 30 inch diameter, 145 km long, API 5L Grade X70 Brunswick Pipeline that evaluated:\n i) pipeline material, welding and construction records with respect to specified requirements, and\n ii) the propensity of the pipeline to external loading via the analysis of repeat inertial measurement unit (IMU) data and a geohazard review of locations exhibiting bending strain to understand the stability of the pipeline in relation to potential external loading.\n This paper describes the systematic approach taken to address the potential concerns, the key results and recommendations of the study and how Emera has incorporated those findings into processes within its management system and protection programs.","PeriodicalId":21327,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent incidents outside Canada prompted the Canadian Energy Regulator (CER), the British Columbia Oil & Gas Commission (BCOGC) and the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to advise pipeline operators regarding the possibility of girth weld strain-induced failures in high strength pipe. In early 2020, the CER issued a Safety Advisory (SA) relating to the possibility of girth weld strain-induced failures in high strength (Grade X 70 or higher) steel line pipe. There was a concern that similar incidents could occur in Canada, given comparable conditions. Furthermore, the SA stated that.... “The CER expects that regulated companies can demonstrate that longitudinal strains resulting from loadings such as those described in Section 4.2.4 of CSA Z662-19 [essentially external loading over and above typical operating loads] have been accounted for in the design, construction and operation of pipelines where strain could potentially accumulate in under-matched girth welds”. With respect to the SA, the failure causes were consistently linked to combinations of: i) high strength pipe with a minimum tensile strength exceeding actual weld strength values, ii) girth weld HAZ softening as a result of the welding process, iii) loads applied to the pipeline causing additional longitudinal strain, and iv) pipes welded with a standard bevel and alignment of approximately 45° between the heat affected zone (HAZ) and the root bead. Emera New Brunswick (Emera) initiated an assessment of the 30 inch diameter, 145 km long, API 5L Grade X70 Brunswick Pipeline that evaluated: i) pipeline material, welding and construction records with respect to specified requirements, and ii) the propensity of the pipeline to external loading via the analysis of repeat inertial measurement unit (IMU) data and a geohazard review of locations exhibiting bending strain to understand the stability of the pipeline in relation to potential external loading. This paper describes the systematic approach taken to address the potential concerns, the key results and recommendations of the study and how Emera has incorporated those findings into processes within its management system and protection programs.
对环焊缝应变失效安全咨询的综合管道记录和检验数据审查与评估
最近在加拿大境外发生的事故促使加拿大能源监管机构(CER)、不列颠哥伦比亚省石油和天然气委员会(BCOGC)和阿尔伯塔省能源监管机构(AER)就高强度管道环焊缝应变导致失效的可能性向管道运营商提出建议。2020年初,CER发布了一份安全咨询(SA),涉及高强度(x70级或更高)钢管环焊缝应变诱发失效的可能性。鉴于类似的条件,有人担心类似的事件可能在加拿大发生。此外,SA表示....“CER期望受监管的公司能够证明,由CSA Z662-19第4.2.4节所述的载荷(基本上是超过典型运行载荷的外部载荷)引起的纵向应变,在管道的设计、建造和运行中已经考虑到了应变可能在不匹配的环焊缝中积累的情况”。就SA而言,失效原因始终与以下因素有关:1)最低抗拉强度超过实际焊接强度值的高强度管道;2)焊接过程导致的环焊缝HAZ软化;3)施加在管道上的载荷导致额外的纵向应变;4)在热影响区(HAZ)和根焊头之间采用标准斜角和约45°对齐的管道焊接。Emera New Brunswick (Emera)对直径30英寸、长145公里、API 5L等级X70 Brunswick管道进行了评估,评估结果如下:i)管道材料、焊接和施工记录与规定的要求有关,ii)通过重复惯性测量单元(IMU)数据的分析和对显示弯曲应变的位置的地质灾害审查来了解管道在潜在外部载荷下的稳定性。本文描述了为解决潜在问题所采取的系统方法,研究的主要结果和建议,以及Emera如何将这些发现纳入其管理系统和保护计划的流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信