The utility of an electrocardiogram in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients presenting with chest pain to emergency department

M. Sanjay, Anju S. Kurien, Merin Abraham, Abraham Speedie
{"title":"The utility of an electrocardiogram in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients presenting with chest pain to emergency department","authors":"M. Sanjay, Anju S. Kurien, Merin Abraham, Abraham Speedie","doi":"10.4103/cmi.cmi_102_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In emergency department (ED), though electrocardiogram (ECG) is obtained for both typical and atypical chest pain, at certain times, it is overutilized even in patients with low-risk factors for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the utility of an ECG in patients presenting with chest pain to the ED. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included patients presenting with chest pain to the ED during August and September 2018. Following their initial assessment at triage, patients were grouped into high-, intermediate- and low-risk categories based on their risk factors for an ACS. ECGs were acquired and categorized into ACS and non-ACS pattern and their utility in each group was assessed. Results: This study cohort contains 313 patients with a male predominance 59.1%. The mean age was 52.6 ± 15.2 years. Typical chest pain was prominent in 95 (30.4%) patients. The incidence of ischemic and structural heart diseases was 53 (16.9%) and 31 (9.9%), respectively. ACS was diagnosed in 92 (29.3%) patients; among them, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina were noted to be 51 (16.3%), 27 (8.6%), and 14 (4.5%), respectively. The incidence of ACS based on risk category classification was as follows: high risk 38.9% (44/113) and intermediate risk 33.8% (48/142) and no patients in low risk had ACS. Conclusions: ECG though a useful screening test to diagnose ACS, should be used judiciously in patients with low risk of ACS to optimally utilize the limited resources in ED.","PeriodicalId":72734,"journal":{"name":"Current medical issues","volume":"12 1","pages":"44 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current medical issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cmi.cmi_102_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In emergency department (ED), though electrocardiogram (ECG) is obtained for both typical and atypical chest pain, at certain times, it is overutilized even in patients with low-risk factors for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the utility of an ECG in patients presenting with chest pain to the ED. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included patients presenting with chest pain to the ED during August and September 2018. Following their initial assessment at triage, patients were grouped into high-, intermediate- and low-risk categories based on their risk factors for an ACS. ECGs were acquired and categorized into ACS and non-ACS pattern and their utility in each group was assessed. Results: This study cohort contains 313 patients with a male predominance 59.1%. The mean age was 52.6 ± 15.2 years. Typical chest pain was prominent in 95 (30.4%) patients. The incidence of ischemic and structural heart diseases was 53 (16.9%) and 31 (9.9%), respectively. ACS was diagnosed in 92 (29.3%) patients; among them, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina were noted to be 51 (16.3%), 27 (8.6%), and 14 (4.5%), respectively. The incidence of ACS based on risk category classification was as follows: high risk 38.9% (44/113) and intermediate risk 33.8% (48/142) and no patients in low risk had ACS. Conclusions: ECG though a useful screening test to diagnose ACS, should be used judiciously in patients with low risk of ACS to optimally utilize the limited resources in ED.
心电图在急诊科出现胸痛的高、中、低危患者中的应用
背景:在急诊科(ED),虽然典型胸痛和非典型胸痛都需要心电图(ECG),但在某些时候,即使是低危险因素的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者也会过度使用心电图(ECG)。本研究旨在评估心电图在急诊科胸痛患者中的应用。材料和方法:本前瞻性研究包括2018年8月至9月期间出现胸痛的急诊科患者。在分诊时进行初步评估后,根据ACS的危险因素将患者分为高、中、低风险类别。获得心电图并将其分为ACS型和非ACS型,并评估其在每组中的效用。结果:本研究共纳入313例患者,男性占59.1%。平均年龄52.6±15.2岁。95例(30.4%)患者典型胸痛突出。缺血性心脏病53例(16.9%),结构性心脏病31例(9.9%)。92例(29.3%)患者被诊断为ACS;其中st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI) 51例(16.3%),非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI) 27例(8.6%),不稳定型心绞痛14例(4.5%)。按危险分类ACS发生率为:高危38.9%(44/113),中危33.8%(48/142),低危无ACS发生。结论:心电图虽然是诊断ACS的有效筛查试验,但在低风险的ACS患者中应谨慎使用,以充分利用有限的ED资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信