Induction and transition in the National Health Service for four professional groups

Hywel Thomas BA (Econ & Soc Studs) MEd PhD PGCE, Judith Hicks BA Dip. Ed MEd, Graeme Martin BSc CertEd MEd, Gill Cressey BEd MSc (Econ) CEE PhD
{"title":"Induction and transition in the National Health Service for four professional groups","authors":"Hywel Thomas BA (Econ & Soc Studs) MEd PhD PGCE,&nbsp;Judith Hicks BA Dip. Ed MEd,&nbsp;Graeme Martin BSc CertEd MEd,&nbsp;Gill Cressey BEd MSc (Econ) CEE PhD","doi":"10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00171.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>National Health Service policies of induction and supporting transition into posts face three key issues: meeting a diversity of needs in terms of change, the integration of induction into a service with profession-specific policies and practices, and their configuration with workforce policies designed to alter role boundaries and develop more interprofessional working. In examining these three areas, the study reported here reviews current practice in four professional groups (dentists working in the community dental service, children's nurses, pharmacists and radiographers) with the purpose of reviewing their experience of induction and transition in relation to National Health Service policies and contexts. The small-scale qualitative study was conducted between September 2005 and March 2006. Twenty-one interviews were undertaken with pharmacists and children's nurses working in hospitals and primary care, radiographers in hospitals and community dentists in primary care; relevant national and local policy documents were also analysed. The study concludes by recognizing that ‘statutory’ induction is secure, that more attention is needed to support interprofessional learning at points of transition; that disparities in access to training may become increasingly problematic; that significant aspects of current practice do not match contemporary policy requirements; and that more research into the models of learning that will facilitate more effective interprofessional working are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100874,"journal":{"name":"Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00171.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00171.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

National Health Service policies of induction and supporting transition into posts face three key issues: meeting a diversity of needs in terms of change, the integration of induction into a service with profession-specific policies and practices, and their configuration with workforce policies designed to alter role boundaries and develop more interprofessional working. In examining these three areas, the study reported here reviews current practice in four professional groups (dentists working in the community dental service, children's nurses, pharmacists and radiographers) with the purpose of reviewing their experience of induction and transition in relation to National Health Service policies and contexts. The small-scale qualitative study was conducted between September 2005 and March 2006. Twenty-one interviews were undertaken with pharmacists and children's nurses working in hospitals and primary care, radiographers in hospitals and community dentists in primary care; relevant national and local policy documents were also analysed. The study concludes by recognizing that ‘statutory’ induction is secure, that more attention is needed to support interprofessional learning at points of transition; that disparities in access to training may become increasingly problematic; that significant aspects of current practice do not match contemporary policy requirements; and that more research into the models of learning that will facilitate more effective interprofessional working are needed.

国家卫生服务体系中四个专业群体的入职和过渡
国民保健服务的入职和支助转岗政策面临三个关键问题:满足变化方面的多样化需求,将入职纳入具有专业特定政策和做法的服务,并将其与旨在改变角色界限和发展更多跨专业工作的劳动力政策相结合。在审查这三个领域时,本文报告的研究审查了四个专业群体(在社区牙科服务工作的牙医、儿童护士、药剂师和放射技师)的现行做法,目的是审查他们在国家卫生服务政策和背景下的入职和过渡经验。该小规模定性研究于2005年9月至2006年3月期间进行。对在医院和初级保健机构工作的药剂师和儿童护士、医院的放射技师和初级保健机构的社区牙医进行了21次访谈;分析了相关的国家和地方政策文件。该研究的结论是,认识到“法定”入职是安全的,需要更多地关注在过渡阶段支持跨专业学习;获得培训机会方面的差异可能会变得越来越成问题;当前实践的重要方面不符合当代政策要求;我们需要对学习模式进行更多的研究,以促进更有效的跨专业合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信