COMPARISON AND VALIDATION OF A FAST METHOD FOR THE EXTRACTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF α-LINOLENIC, EICOSAPENTAENOIC, AND DOCOSAHEXAENOIC FATTY ACIDS

Alejandro Oviedo Castrillón, N. Laverde, C. M. Rodríguez, B. Marín
{"title":"COMPARISON AND VALIDATION OF A FAST METHOD FOR THE EXTRACTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF α-LINOLENIC, EICOSAPENTAENOIC, AND DOCOSAHEXAENOIC FATTY ACIDS","authors":"Alejandro Oviedo Castrillón, N. Laverde, C. M. Rodríguez, B. Marín","doi":"10.17533/UDEA.VITAE.V23N3A05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Omega 3 family fatty acids are currently widely studied for the diverse effects they have on cardiovascular disease risk factors. Seafood is the main natural source of these compounds. OBJETIVE: In this paper the accuracy is verified on the fat extraction in fish, between two methods, using one of the most employees as it is the Bligh & Dyer since 1959, compared with SOXTEC, one more updated method with more modern equipment and validated quantification method for some fatty acids omega 3 by gas chromatography. METHODS: Fat extraction was performed by SOXTEC and Bligh & Dyer uses a Certified Reference Material (SRM 1946). After having assessed the accuracy of both systems, a quantification method of α-Linolenic, Eicosapentaenoic, and Docosahexaenoic fatty acids was validated through gas chromatography. RESULTS: It was found that the method proposed by Bligh & Dyer in 1959 is the most accurate because it showed better recovery percentages. Also, it was found that the omega 3 most important fatty acid quantification validation method complies with every parameter assessed throughout the validation. CONCLUSION: In conclusion Soxtec being a more modern method which uses the latest technology , the Bligh & Dyer is the most effective method for removing fat in fish and gas chromatography allows quantification of fatty acids with precision and accuracy as meets the parameters evaluated .","PeriodicalId":23515,"journal":{"name":"Vitae-revista De La Facultad De Quimica Farmaceutica","volume":"282 1","pages":"194-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vitae-revista De La Facultad De Quimica Farmaceutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/UDEA.VITAE.V23N3A05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Omega 3 family fatty acids are currently widely studied for the diverse effects they have on cardiovascular disease risk factors. Seafood is the main natural source of these compounds. OBJETIVE: In this paper the accuracy is verified on the fat extraction in fish, between two methods, using one of the most employees as it is the Bligh & Dyer since 1959, compared with SOXTEC, one more updated method with more modern equipment and validated quantification method for some fatty acids omega 3 by gas chromatography. METHODS: Fat extraction was performed by SOXTEC and Bligh & Dyer uses a Certified Reference Material (SRM 1946). After having assessed the accuracy of both systems, a quantification method of α-Linolenic, Eicosapentaenoic, and Docosahexaenoic fatty acids was validated through gas chromatography. RESULTS: It was found that the method proposed by Bligh & Dyer in 1959 is the most accurate because it showed better recovery percentages. Also, it was found that the omega 3 most important fatty acid quantification validation method complies with every parameter assessed throughout the validation. CONCLUSION: In conclusion Soxtec being a more modern method which uses the latest technology , the Bligh & Dyer is the most effective method for removing fat in fish and gas chromatography allows quantification of fatty acids with precision and accuracy as meets the parameters evaluated .
α-亚麻酸、二十碳五烯和二十二碳六烯脂肪酸快速提取和定量方法的比较与验证
背景:欧米茄3家族脂肪酸目前因其对心血管疾病危险因素的不同影响而被广泛研究。海鲜是这些化合物的主要天然来源。目的:本文对鱼中脂肪提取的准确性进行了验证,在两种方法之间,采用了最先进的方法之一,因为它是Bligh & Dyer公司自1959年以来使用的,与SOXTEC相比,SOXTEC是一种更新的方法,配备了更现代化的设备,并验证了气相色谱法对某些脂肪酸- 3的定量方法。方法:脂肪提取由SOXTEC和Bligh & Dyer使用认证标准物质(SRM 1946)进行。在评估了两种体系的准确性后,通过气相色谱法验证了α-亚麻酸、二十碳五烯酸和二十二碳六烯酸脂肪酸的定量方法。结果:1959年Bligh & Dyer提出的方法回收率较高,准确度最高。此外,发现omega - 3最重要脂肪酸定量验证方法符合整个验证过程中评估的每个参数。结论:总之,Soxtec是一种采用最新技术的更现代的方法,Bligh & Dyer是去除鱼类脂肪最有效的方法,气相色谱法可以精确和准确地定量脂肪酸,满足所评估的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信