Years of healthy life.

P. Erickson, R. Wilson, I. Shannon
{"title":"Years of healthy life.","authors":"P. Erickson, R. Wilson, I. Shannon","doi":"10.1037/E583992012-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing the span of healthy life for Americans is one of the three broad goals of Healthy People 2000 (1). The years of healthy life measure has been selected for monitoring progress toward this goal. The sources and methods used for calculating years of healthy life are described in this issue of Statistical Notes. Estimated years of healthy life measures for 1990 for the total U.S. population and for selected subgroups are presented and discussed. Historically, health has been measured primarily in terms of mortality—infant mortality, life expectancy, age-specific and disease-specific death rates—and morbidity—disability days and prevalence of chronic conditions. On the one hand, measures of mortality may understate the public health importance of conditions that result in proportionately more morbidity and disability. On the other hand, commonly used morbidity measures tend to focus on physical function and thus may underestimate social and mental dysfunction as well as satisfaction with health. In addition, these traditional indicators do not provide summary information on a population’s health status. A single measure that incorporates health-related quality of life and life expectancy gives a more comprehensive picture of the population’s health. Such a summary number would help in monitoring the Nation’s health, identifying health priorities, evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, and comparing the effectiveness of different interventions. Several approaches to the development of a comprehensive measure have been taken, including Disability Free Life Years (2,3), Healthy Life Expectancy (4,5), and Disability Adjusted Life Years (6). The years of healthy life (YHL) concept, however, has emerged as one of the more commonly used health status measures that include both mortality and morbidity. Years of healthy life can be sensitive to changes in health among the well and the ill.","PeriodicalId":79957,"journal":{"name":"Healthy People 2000 statistical notes","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"192","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy People 2000 statistical notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/E583992012-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 192

Abstract

Increasing the span of healthy life for Americans is one of the three broad goals of Healthy People 2000 (1). The years of healthy life measure has been selected for monitoring progress toward this goal. The sources and methods used for calculating years of healthy life are described in this issue of Statistical Notes. Estimated years of healthy life measures for 1990 for the total U.S. population and for selected subgroups are presented and discussed. Historically, health has been measured primarily in terms of mortality—infant mortality, life expectancy, age-specific and disease-specific death rates—and morbidity—disability days and prevalence of chronic conditions. On the one hand, measures of mortality may understate the public health importance of conditions that result in proportionately more morbidity and disability. On the other hand, commonly used morbidity measures tend to focus on physical function and thus may underestimate social and mental dysfunction as well as satisfaction with health. In addition, these traditional indicators do not provide summary information on a population’s health status. A single measure that incorporates health-related quality of life and life expectancy gives a more comprehensive picture of the population’s health. Such a summary number would help in monitoring the Nation’s health, identifying health priorities, evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, and comparing the effectiveness of different interventions. Several approaches to the development of a comprehensive measure have been taken, including Disability Free Life Years (2,3), Healthy Life Expectancy (4,5), and Disability Adjusted Life Years (6). The years of healthy life (YHL) concept, however, has emerged as one of the more commonly used health status measures that include both mortality and morbidity. Years of healthy life can be sensitive to changes in health among the well and the ill.
多年的健康生活。
延长美国人的健康寿命是2000年健康人计划(1)的三大目标之一。选择健康寿命年数来监测实现这一目标的进展情况。计算健康寿命年数的来源和方法载于本期《统计说明》。提出并讨论了1990年美国总人口和选定亚组的估计健康生活年数。从历史上看,衡量健康的主要标准是死亡率——婴儿死亡率、预期寿命、特定年龄和特定疾病的死亡率——以及发病率——残疾天数和慢性病的流行程度。一方面,对死亡率的衡量可能低估了导致发病率和残疾比例上升的疾病对公共卫生的重要性。另一方面,常用的发病率测量往往侧重于身体功能,因此可能低估了社会和精神功能障碍以及对健康的满意度。此外,这些传统指标不能提供关于人口健康状况的摘要信息。将与健康有关的生活质量和预期寿命结合起来的单一衡量标准可以更全面地反映人口的健康状况。这样一个汇总数字将有助于监测全国的卫生状况,确定卫生优先事项,评估干预措施的有效性,并比较不同干预措施的有效性。已经采取了几种方法来制定综合措施,包括无残疾生命年(2,3)、健康预期寿命年(4,5)和残疾调整生命年(6)。然而,健康生命年(YHL)概念已成为更常用的健康状况措施之一,包括死亡率和发病率。多年的健康生活对健康和疾病之间的健康变化很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信