Technoeconomic assessment of direct biomass liquefaction to transportation fuels

D.C. Elliott , E.G. Baker , D. Beckman , Y. Solantausta , V. Tolenhiemo , S.B. Gevert , C. Hörnell , A. Östman , B. Kjellström
{"title":"Technoeconomic assessment of direct biomass liquefaction to transportation fuels","authors":"D.C. Elliott ,&nbsp;E.G. Baker ,&nbsp;D. Beckman ,&nbsp;Y. Solantausta ,&nbsp;V. Tolenhiemo ,&nbsp;S.B. Gevert ,&nbsp;C. Hörnell ,&nbsp;A. Östman ,&nbsp;B. Kjellström","doi":"10.1016/0144-4565(90)90021-B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper discusses the results of a technoeconomic assessment of direct biomass liquefaction processes converting wood to gasoline and diesel fuels. The study was carried out by the Working Group of the International Energy Agency Direct Biomass Liquefaction Activity, in which Canada, Finland, Sweden, and the US participated. The processes chosen for detailed analysis were Atmospheric Flash Pyrolysis (AFP) and Liquefaction In Pressurized Solvent (LIPS). The assessment covered three steps for each process from feed to final product: </p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>1. primary liquefaction to a crude oil product,</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>2. catalytic hydrotreating to upgrade the crude product to a deoxygenated product oil,</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>3. refining the deoxygenated product to gasoline and diesel fuel.</p></span></li></ul><p>Present technology cases and potential future technology cases were evaluated. A consistent analytical basis was used throughout to allow comparison of the processes. This assessment shows that AFP is more economical than LIPS both for the production of boiler fuel oil as the primary liquefaction product and for the production of gasoline and diesel fuel products. The potential for future cost reduction through research and development is also clearly demonstrated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100179,"journal":{"name":"Biomass","volume":"22 1","pages":"Pages 251-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0144-4565(90)90021-B","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014445659090021B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

This paper discusses the results of a technoeconomic assessment of direct biomass liquefaction processes converting wood to gasoline and diesel fuels. The study was carried out by the Working Group of the International Energy Agency Direct Biomass Liquefaction Activity, in which Canada, Finland, Sweden, and the US participated. The processes chosen for detailed analysis were Atmospheric Flash Pyrolysis (AFP) and Liquefaction In Pressurized Solvent (LIPS). The assessment covered three steps for each process from feed to final product:

  • 1.

    1. primary liquefaction to a crude oil product,

  • 2.

    2. catalytic hydrotreating to upgrade the crude product to a deoxygenated product oil,

  • 3.

    3. refining the deoxygenated product to gasoline and diesel fuel.

Present technology cases and potential future technology cases were evaluated. A consistent analytical basis was used throughout to allow comparison of the processes. This assessment shows that AFP is more economical than LIPS both for the production of boiler fuel oil as the primary liquefaction product and for the production of gasoline and diesel fuel products. The potential for future cost reduction through research and development is also clearly demonstrated.

生物质直接液化生产运输燃料的技术经济评价
本文讨论了将木材转化为汽油和柴油燃料的直接生物质液化过程的技术经济评估结果。这项研究是由国际能源机构直接生物质液化活动工作组进行的,加拿大、芬兰、瑞典和美国参加了该工作组。详细分析选择常压闪蒸裂解(AFP)和加压溶剂液化(LIPS)两种工艺。评估涵盖了从饲料到最终产品的每个过程的三个步骤:初级液化为原油产品,2.2。催化加氢处理使原油产品升级为脱氧成品油;将脱氧产物提炼成汽油和柴油燃料。对现有技术案例和潜在的未来技术案例进行了评估。在整个过程中使用了一致的分析基础,以便对过程进行比较。这一评估表明,AFP在生产作为主要液化产品的锅炉燃料油和生产汽油和柴油燃料产品方面都比lip更经济。通过研究和开发,未来降低成本的潜力也得到了清楚的证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信