Safety of biological therapy in children and adolescents with severe asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case series

M. Votto, Viola Santi, Marta Bajeli, M. De Filippo, E. Deidda, Emanuela De Stefano, Francesco Dianin, Chiara Raviola, Cecilia Silvi, G. Marseglia, A. Licari
{"title":"Safety of biological therapy in children and adolescents with severe asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case series","authors":"M. Votto, Viola Santi, Marta Bajeli, M. De Filippo, E. Deidda, Emanuela De Stefano, Francesco Dianin, Chiara Raviola, Cecilia Silvi, G. Marseglia, A. Licari","doi":"10.23750/abm.v93iS3.13073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim: It is still unclear whether patients with severe asthma are at greater risk of developing severe COVID-19, particularly pediatric allergic patients under biologic therapy. Studies targeting pediatric patients are currently limited; thus, this study aims to assess the clinical characteristics of young patients with severe asthma under biological therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We collected data from February 2020 to April 2021. Patients with severe asthma treated with biological therapies (omalizumab and mepolizumab) have been enrolled. We described demographic data, clinical features, therapies, comorbidities, and laboratory findings for each patient. For patients who got COVID-19, we also described the severity of the disease, the need for hospitalization, and specific therapy. Results: A total of 14 patients were included in the study, 11 (78.6%) of them under treatment with omalizumab and 3 (21.6%) with mepolizumab. We identified four patients (28.6%) who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Two patients treated with mepolizumab had an asymptomatic disease, and two patients treated with omalizumab had mild disease. Only one patient with mild COVID-19 required hospitalization and specific therapy because of severe obesity. Conclusions: No differences regarding the SARS-CoV-2 infection have been found between the two treatments groups. Furthermore, any poor outcome has been observed, confirming the safety of biological therapies. The limited number of patients enrolled and the lack of a control group did not establish a significant risk for infections for these patients. (www.actabiomedica.it).","PeriodicalId":93849,"journal":{"name":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS3.13073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and aim: It is still unclear whether patients with severe asthma are at greater risk of developing severe COVID-19, particularly pediatric allergic patients under biologic therapy. Studies targeting pediatric patients are currently limited; thus, this study aims to assess the clinical characteristics of young patients with severe asthma under biological therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We collected data from February 2020 to April 2021. Patients with severe asthma treated with biological therapies (omalizumab and mepolizumab) have been enrolled. We described demographic data, clinical features, therapies, comorbidities, and laboratory findings for each patient. For patients who got COVID-19, we also described the severity of the disease, the need for hospitalization, and specific therapy. Results: A total of 14 patients were included in the study, 11 (78.6%) of them under treatment with omalizumab and 3 (21.6%) with mepolizumab. We identified four patients (28.6%) who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Two patients treated with mepolizumab had an asymptomatic disease, and two patients treated with omalizumab had mild disease. Only one patient with mild COVID-19 required hospitalization and specific therapy because of severe obesity. Conclusions: No differences regarding the SARS-CoV-2 infection have been found between the two treatments groups. Furthermore, any poor outcome has been observed, confirming the safety of biological therapies. The limited number of patients enrolled and the lack of a control group did not establish a significant risk for infections for these patients. (www.actabiomedica.it).
COVID-19大流行期间严重哮喘儿童和青少年生物治疗的安全性:一个病例系列
背景与目的:目前尚不清楚严重哮喘患者,特别是接受生物治疗的儿科过敏患者是否更容易发生严重的COVID-19。针对儿科患者的研究目前有限;因此,本研究旨在评估新冠肺炎大流行期间接受生物治疗的年轻重症哮喘患者的临床特征。方法:收集2020年2月至2021年4月的数据。接受生物疗法(omalizumab和mepolizumab)治疗的严重哮喘患者已入组。我们描述了每位患者的人口统计数据、临床特征、治疗方法、合并症和实验室结果。对于感染COVID-19的患者,我们还描述了疾病的严重程度、住院治疗的必要性和特定治疗。结果:共有14例患者纳入研究,其中11例(78.6%)接受omalizumab治疗,3例(21.6%)接受mepolizumab治疗。我们确定了4例(28.6%)患者的SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性。两名接受mepolizumab治疗的患者无症状,两名接受omalizumab治疗的患者有轻度疾病。只有一名轻症患者因严重肥胖而需要住院和特异性治疗。结论:两组患者SARS-CoV-2感染情况无明显差异。此外,观察到任何不良结果,证实了生物疗法的安全性。入选的患者数量有限且缺乏对照组,这些患者感染的风险并不大。(www.actabiomedica.it)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信