Evaluation of a Muslim Pre-School in the United States Using Elements of the Ofsted Model

H. Elannani
{"title":"Evaluation of a Muslim Pre-School in the United States Using Elements of the Ofsted Model","authors":"H. Elannani","doi":"10.52015/jrss.11i2.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviewed the Ofsted inspection model in England and reported on its implementation in a Muslim pre-school located in an American southeastern state. The inspection methods included classroom observations, interviews with staff, parent survey, and scrutiny of artifacts. After the pre-school was inspected and the feedback was given to the administration orally and in a detailed written report, an improvement plan was developed by the author to address the inspection recommendations. The results of the inspection showed that implementing elements of the Ofsted inspection model in the pre-school contributed to overall educational improvement. A follow-up communication with the administration showed that curriculum changes were made, teachers were provided with more professional development opportunities, and their teaching practices had improved. Considering these findings, this study demonstrated that there was an alignment between the mission of the pre-school and the parents’ aspirations; and that an educational accountability system such as the Ofsted inspection model have had a positive impact on the educational provision even though not all elements of the inspection model were implemented, many of which require a team of inspectors and a quality assurance mechanism.","PeriodicalId":92175,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of research in social sciences and humanities","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of research in social sciences and humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52015/jrss.11i2.198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reviewed the Ofsted inspection model in England and reported on its implementation in a Muslim pre-school located in an American southeastern state. The inspection methods included classroom observations, interviews with staff, parent survey, and scrutiny of artifacts. After the pre-school was inspected and the feedback was given to the administration orally and in a detailed written report, an improvement plan was developed by the author to address the inspection recommendations. The results of the inspection showed that implementing elements of the Ofsted inspection model in the pre-school contributed to overall educational improvement. A follow-up communication with the administration showed that curriculum changes were made, teachers were provided with more professional development opportunities, and their teaching practices had improved. Considering these findings, this study demonstrated that there was an alignment between the mission of the pre-school and the parents’ aspirations; and that an educational accountability system such as the Ofsted inspection model have had a positive impact on the educational provision even though not all elements of the inspection model were implemented, many of which require a team of inspectors and a quality assurance mechanism.
用教育标准局模式的要素评价美国一所穆斯林幼儿园
本文回顾了英国教育标准局的检查模式,并报告了其在美国东南部一个州的穆斯林幼儿园的实施情况。检查方法包括课堂观察、与员工面谈、家长调查和文物检查。在对幼儿园进行检查并以口头和详细的书面报告的形式向行政部门提供反馈后,作者制定了一项改进计划,以解决检查建议。检查的结果表明,在学前教育中实施教育标准局检查模式的要素有助于整体教育的改善。与行政部门的后续沟通表明,课程做出了改变,教师获得了更多的专业发展机会,他们的教学实践得到了改善。考虑到这些发现,本研究表明,幼儿园的使命与家长的愿望是一致的;教育标准局的检查模式等教育问责制对教育提供产生了积极影响,尽管检查模式的所有要素并未得到实施,其中许多要素需要一个检查员团队和质量保证机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信