Prussian codification of 1794 as a monument of law and an object of study

Vladimir Kizyakovsky
{"title":"Prussian codification of 1794 as a monument of law and an object of study","authors":"Vladimir Kizyakovsky","doi":"10.31857/s102694520026687-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the general analysis of Landrecht of 1794 - a monument of law, which, according to the author, is unfounded, ignored by legal historians. Landrecht is unique in many ways: an unprecedented scope, the number of branches of law included, the legal sources used, the detailed method of presenting the rules, legal technique and language, the history of creation, focus on application in judicial practice, low “viability”, etc. Explain why the legislative act has such characteristics - the task of the historian of law. The study of the realities associated with this codification, the analysis of the structure, institutions and legal terminology, and finally, the translation and publication into Russian will fill the gap in historical and legal science and help in solving the most important issues for modern law enforcement practice, such as: assessment criteria legal act (understandability, accessibility, applicability, optimal combination of volume, structure and content, compliance with the ideological program of state power, continuity of legal norms and institutions, and many others) and the use of the legal experience of the past in the modern legislative process and law enforcement","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"275 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520026687-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the general analysis of Landrecht of 1794 - a monument of law, which, according to the author, is unfounded, ignored by legal historians. Landrecht is unique in many ways: an unprecedented scope, the number of branches of law included, the legal sources used, the detailed method of presenting the rules, legal technique and language, the history of creation, focus on application in judicial practice, low “viability”, etc. Explain why the legislative act has such characteristics - the task of the historian of law. The study of the realities associated with this codification, the analysis of the structure, institutions and legal terminology, and finally, the translation and publication into Russian will fill the gap in historical and legal science and help in solving the most important issues for modern law enforcement practice, such as: assessment criteria legal act (understandability, accessibility, applicability, optimal combination of volume, structure and content, compliance with the ideological program of state power, continuity of legal norms and institutions, and many others) and the use of the legal experience of the past in the modern legislative process and law enforcement
作为法律的丰碑和研究对象的1794年普鲁士法典
这篇文章致力于对1794年兰德雷希特案的总体分析,这是法律的丰碑,根据作者的说法,这是没有根据的,被法律史学家所忽视。Landrecht在许多方面都是独一无二的:前所未有的范围,包括的法律分支的数量,所使用的法律来源,详细的规则呈现方法,法律技术和语言,创造的历史,注重在司法实践中的应用,低“可行性”等。解释立法行为为何具有这样的特征——法律史家的任务。对编纂相关现实的研究,对结构、制度和法律术语的分析,最后将其翻译并出版成俄文,将填补历史和法律科学的空白,并有助于解决现代执法实践中最重要的问题,例如:评估标准法律行为(可理解性,可及性,适用性,体积,结构和内容的最佳组合,符合国家权力的意识形态计划,法律规范和制度的连续性,以及许多其他)以及在现代立法过程和执法中使用过去的法律经验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信