Sensuous entanglements: a critique of cockfighting conceived as a “cultural text”

IF 1.5
Muhammad A. Kavesh
{"title":"Sensuous entanglements: a critique of cockfighting conceived as a “cultural text”","authors":"Muhammad A. Kavesh","doi":"10.1080/17458927.2020.1858653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How can care and cruelty, intimacy and indifference, passion and combat, and attachment and detachment coexist in interspecies relations? How can we develop a deeper understanding of more-than-human relatedness through the study of this nexus? Specifically, how can an understanding of cockfighting as an expression of intimacy lead us to redefine crucial cultural themes such as “masculinity” and “honor” in a rural Pakistani setting? Based on yearlong ethnographic fieldwork in rural South Punjab, this paper argues that in order to understand the multiple modalities of human-rooster relationship, our analysis should delve beneath the visual spectacle and engage with local ways of sensing and understandings of the practice. It contends that a multisensory analysis of cockfighting that focuses on the interplay of different senses – including the sound of roosters, the smell of their bodies, their preference in taste, texture of their plumage and muscles, and the sight of their fight – can help critique and refigure Clifford Geertz’s interpretation of cockfighting as a “cultural text.”","PeriodicalId":75188,"journal":{"name":"The senses and society","volume":"158 1","pages":"151 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The senses and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2020.1858653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT How can care and cruelty, intimacy and indifference, passion and combat, and attachment and detachment coexist in interspecies relations? How can we develop a deeper understanding of more-than-human relatedness through the study of this nexus? Specifically, how can an understanding of cockfighting as an expression of intimacy lead us to redefine crucial cultural themes such as “masculinity” and “honor” in a rural Pakistani setting? Based on yearlong ethnographic fieldwork in rural South Punjab, this paper argues that in order to understand the multiple modalities of human-rooster relationship, our analysis should delve beneath the visual spectacle and engage with local ways of sensing and understandings of the practice. It contends that a multisensory analysis of cockfighting that focuses on the interplay of different senses – including the sound of roosters, the smell of their bodies, their preference in taste, texture of their plumage and muscles, and the sight of their fight – can help critique and refigure Clifford Geertz’s interpretation of cockfighting as a “cultural text.”
感官的纠缠:对斗鸡的一种“文化文本”的批判
在物种间关系中,关心与残酷、亲密与冷漠、激情与斗争、依恋与超然如何共存?我们如何通过对这种联系的研究,对超越人类的关系有更深的理解?具体来说,将斗鸡理解为一种亲密的表达方式,如何引导我们重新定义巴基斯坦农村环境中的“男子气概”和“荣誉”等重要文化主题?基于在南旁遮普农村长达一年的民族志田野调查,本文认为,为了理解人类与公鸡关系的多种模式,我们的分析应该深入到视觉奇观之下,并参与当地对实践的感知和理解方式。它认为,对斗鸡进行多感官分析,关注不同感官的相互作用——包括公鸡的声音,它们身体的气味,它们对味道的偏好,它们羽毛和肌肉的质地,以及它们战斗的景象——可以帮助批评和重新定义克利福德·格尔茨对斗鸡作为一种“文化文本”的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信