ANALYSIS OF SINGLE AND ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFIERS FOR PHISHING ATTACKS DETECTION

Oyelakin A. M, Alimi O. M, Mustapha I. O, Ajiboye I. K
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF SINGLE AND ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFIERS FOR PHISHING ATTACKS DETECTION","authors":"Oyelakin A. M, Alimi O. M, Mustapha I. O, Ajiboye I. K","doi":"10.15282/ijsecs.7.2.2021.5.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phishing attacks have been used in different ways to harvest the confidential information of unsuspecting internet users. To stem the tide of phishing-based attacks, several machine learning techniques have been proposed in the past. However, fewer studies have considered investigating single and ensemble machine learning-based models for the classification of phishing attacks. This study carried out performance analysis of selected single and ensemble machine learning (ML) classifiers in phishing classification.The focus is to investigate how these algorithms behave in the classification of phishing attacks in the chosen dataset. Logistic Regression and Decision Trees were chosen as single learning classifiers while simple voting techniques and Random Forest were used as the ensemble machine learning algorithms. Accuracy, Precision, Recall and F1-score were used as performance metrics. Logistic Regression algorithm recorded 0.86 as accuracy, 0.89 as precision, 0.87 as recall and 0.81 as F1-score. Similarly, the Decision Trees classifier achieved an accuracy of 0.87, 0.83 for precision, 0.88 for recall and 0.81 for F1-score. In the voting ensemble, accuracy of 0.92 was achieved. 0.90 was obtained for precision, 0.92 for recall and 0.92 for F1-score. Random Forest algorithm recorded 0.98, 0.97, 0.98 and 0.97 as accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score respectively. From the experimental analyses, Random Forest algorithm outperformed simple averaging classifier and the two single algorithms used for phishing url detection. The study established that the ensemble techniques that were used for the experimentations are more efficient for phishing url identification compared to the single classifiers.\n ","PeriodicalId":31240,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15282/ijsecs.7.2.2021.5.0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Phishing attacks have been used in different ways to harvest the confidential information of unsuspecting internet users. To stem the tide of phishing-based attacks, several machine learning techniques have been proposed in the past. However, fewer studies have considered investigating single and ensemble machine learning-based models for the classification of phishing attacks. This study carried out performance analysis of selected single and ensemble machine learning (ML) classifiers in phishing classification.The focus is to investigate how these algorithms behave in the classification of phishing attacks in the chosen dataset. Logistic Regression and Decision Trees were chosen as single learning classifiers while simple voting techniques and Random Forest were used as the ensemble machine learning algorithms. Accuracy, Precision, Recall and F1-score were used as performance metrics. Logistic Regression algorithm recorded 0.86 as accuracy, 0.89 as precision, 0.87 as recall and 0.81 as F1-score. Similarly, the Decision Trees classifier achieved an accuracy of 0.87, 0.83 for precision, 0.88 for recall and 0.81 for F1-score. In the voting ensemble, accuracy of 0.92 was achieved. 0.90 was obtained for precision, 0.92 for recall and 0.92 for F1-score. Random Forest algorithm recorded 0.98, 0.97, 0.98 and 0.97 as accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score respectively. From the experimental analyses, Random Forest algorithm outperformed simple averaging classifier and the two single algorithms used for phishing url detection. The study established that the ensemble techniques that were used for the experimentations are more efficient for phishing url identification compared to the single classifiers.  
用于网络钓鱼攻击检测的单个和集成机器学习分类器分析
网络钓鱼攻击以不同的方式被用来获取毫无戒心的互联网用户的机密信息。为了阻止基于网络钓鱼的攻击浪潮,过去已经提出了几种机器学习技术。然而,很少有研究考虑调查基于单一和集成机器学习的网络钓鱼攻击分类模型。本研究对所选的单个和集成机器学习(ML)分类器在网络钓鱼分类中的性能进行了分析。重点是研究这些算法在所选数据集中如何对网络钓鱼攻击进行分类。选择逻辑回归和决策树作为单一学习分类器,而简单投票技术和随机森林作为集成机器学习算法。准确性、精密度、召回率和f1得分作为绩效指标。Logistic回归算法的准确率为0.86,精密度为0.89,召回率为0.87,f1得分为0.81。同样,决策树分类器的准确率为0.87,精密度为0.83,召回率为0.88,F1-score为0.81。在投票集合中,准确率达到0.92。精密度为0.90,召回率为0.92,f1评分为0.92。随机森林算法的准确率为0.98,精密度为0.97,召回率为0.98,f1得分为0.97。从实验分析来看,随机森林算法优于简单平均分类器和用于网络钓鱼url检测的两种单一算法。研究表明,与单一分类器相比,用于实验的集成技术对于网络钓鱼url识别更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信