Slug Induced Vibrations Modelling

Kevin Le Prin, M. Mínguez, A. Liné
{"title":"Slug Induced Vibrations Modelling","authors":"Kevin Le Prin, M. Mínguez, A. Liné","doi":"10.4043/29306-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, the authors present an alternative methodology to improve (or at least to reduce) the uncertainty level within the prediction of the life time of subsea structures. The focus is made on rigid spool & jumper (or any piping system) prone to internal intermittent multiphase flow (currently named slug flow) and any potential Flow-Induced Vibrations (FIV) phenomenon. As it will be more exhaustively detailed here below, the proposed modelling aims at recovering at the best both (i) the multiphase flow kinematics (i.e. both gas pocket & liquid slug) to be expected in the flow loop and (ii) the resulting loads seen by the structure. The considered multiphase flow solver is based on the well-known Unit Cell Model (UCM, refer to Nicklin et al. (1962), Wallis (1969)) and coupled with usual commercial Finite Element (FE) solvers to recover the expected vibratory levels within the mechanical system.\n With rigorous purpose, a step-by-step validation process is presented within this paper to progressively validate the different step changes in regard to the current Best Practices (as e.g. reminded by Payne (2015) or Ancian (2016)). Both Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model and experimental database, as extracted from the literature, have been considered to assess the ability of the proposed methodology to recover the expected multiphase flow kinematics and the loads induced by a Taylor bubble flowing within a rigid spool. Once validated, the multiphase flow solver has been coupled to a Finite Element (FE) model to properly assess the Flow-Induced Vibrations (FIV) of the spool resulting from such intermittent slugging solicitations. As here below underlined, the presented comparisons with the Industry Standards suggest (i) the need to challenge the recommended practices to ensure safe and reliable design and (ii) to properly manage the safety Design Fatigue Factor (DFF) to be considered within engineering phases.","PeriodicalId":10968,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, May 08, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, May 08, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29306-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the authors present an alternative methodology to improve (or at least to reduce) the uncertainty level within the prediction of the life time of subsea structures. The focus is made on rigid spool & jumper (or any piping system) prone to internal intermittent multiphase flow (currently named slug flow) and any potential Flow-Induced Vibrations (FIV) phenomenon. As it will be more exhaustively detailed here below, the proposed modelling aims at recovering at the best both (i) the multiphase flow kinematics (i.e. both gas pocket & liquid slug) to be expected in the flow loop and (ii) the resulting loads seen by the structure. The considered multiphase flow solver is based on the well-known Unit Cell Model (UCM, refer to Nicklin et al. (1962), Wallis (1969)) and coupled with usual commercial Finite Element (FE) solvers to recover the expected vibratory levels within the mechanical system. With rigorous purpose, a step-by-step validation process is presented within this paper to progressively validate the different step changes in regard to the current Best Practices (as e.g. reminded by Payne (2015) or Ancian (2016)). Both Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model and experimental database, as extracted from the literature, have been considered to assess the ability of the proposed methodology to recover the expected multiphase flow kinematics and the loads induced by a Taylor bubble flowing within a rigid spool. Once validated, the multiphase flow solver has been coupled to a Finite Element (FE) model to properly assess the Flow-Induced Vibrations (FIV) of the spool resulting from such intermittent slugging solicitations. As here below underlined, the presented comparisons with the Industry Standards suggest (i) the need to challenge the recommended practices to ensure safe and reliable design and (ii) to properly manage the safety Design Fatigue Factor (DFF) to be considered within engineering phases.
段塞流诱发振动模型
在本文中,作者提出了一种替代方法来改善(或至少减少)海底结构寿命预测中的不确定性水平。重点是刚性阀芯和跳线(或任何管道系统)容易产生内部间歇多相流(目前称为段塞流)和任何潜在的流致振动(FIV)现象。正如下面将更详尽地详细说明的那样,所提出的建模旨在尽可能地恢复(i)流动回路中预期的多相流动运动学(即气穴和液段塞)和(ii)结构所看到的结果载荷。所考虑的多相流求解器基于众所周知的单元胞模型(UCM,参考Nicklin等人(1962),Wallis(1969)),并与通常的商业有限元(FE)求解器相结合,以恢复机械系统内的预期振动水平。出于严格的目的,本文提出了一个逐步验证过程,以逐步验证当前最佳实践的不同步骤变化(例如,Payne(2015)或Ancian(2016)提醒)。从文献中提取的计算流体动力学(CFD)模型和实验数据库已被考虑用于评估所提出的方法恢复预期的多相流运动学和由刚性阀芯内流动的Taylor气泡引起的载荷的能力。一旦验证,多相流求解器将与有限元(FE)模型耦合,以正确评估由这种间歇性段塞请求引起的阀芯的流致振动(FIV)。正如下面所强调的,与行业标准的比较表明(i)需要挑战推荐的做法,以确保安全可靠的设计;(ii)在工程阶段适当管理安全设计疲劳系数(DFF)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信