Historical Overview and Future Perspective of Chemical EOR Project for Major Malaysian Offshore Oilfield: Case Study

Abstract

A major Malaysian offshore oilfield, which is currently operating under waterflooding for a quite long time and declining in oil production, plan to convert as chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) injection. The CEOR journey started since the first oil production in year 2000 and proximate waterflooding, with research and development in determining suitable method, encouraging field trial results and a series of field development plans to maximize potential recovery above waterflooding and prolong the production field life. A comprehensive EOR study including screening, laboratory tests, pilot evaluation, and full field reservoir simulation modelling are conducted to reduce the project risks prior to the full field investment and execution. Among several EOR techniques, Alkaline-Surfactant (AS) flooding is chosen to be implemented in this field. Several CEOR key parameters have been studied and optimized in the laboratory such as chemical concentration, chemical adsorption, interfacial tension (IFT), slug size, residual oil saturation (Sor) reduction, thermal stability, flow assurance, emulsion, dilution, and a chemical injection scheme. Uncertainty analysis on CEOR process was done due to the large well spacing in the offshore environment as compared to other CEOR projects, which are onshore with shorter well spacing. The key risks and parameters such as residual oil saturation (Sorw), adsorption and interfacial tension (IFT) cut-off in the dynamic chemical simulator have been investigated via a probabilistic approach on top of deterministic method. The laboratory results from fluid-fluid and rock-fluid analyses ascertained a potential of ultra-low interfacial tension of 0.001 dyne/cm with adsorption of 0.30 mg/gr-of-rock, which translated to a 50-75% reduction in Sor after waterflooding. The results of four single well chemical tracer tests (SWCTT) on two wells validated the effectiveness of the Alkaline Surfactant by a reduction of 50-80% in Sor. The most suitable chemical formulation was found 1.0 wt. % Alkali and 0.075 wt. % Surfactant. The field trial results were thenceforth upscaled to a dynamic chemical simulation; from single well to full field modeling, resulting an optimal chemical injection of three years or almost 0.2 effective injection pore volume, coupled with six months of low salinity treated water as pre-flush and post-flush injection. The latest field development study results yield a technical potential recoverable volume of 14, 16, and 26 MMstb (above waterflooding) for low, most likely, and high cases, respectively, which translated to an additional EOR recovery factor up to 5.6 % for most-likely case by end of technical field life. Prior to the final investment decision stage, Petronas’ position was to proceed with the project based on the techno-commerciality and associated risks as per milestone review 5, albeit it came to an agreement to have differing interpretations towards the technical basis of the project in the final steering committee. Subsequently, due to the eventual plunging global crude oil price, the project was then reprioritized and adjourned correspondingly within Petronas’ upstream portfolio management. Further phased development including a producing pilot has been debated with the main objective to address key technical and business uncertainties and risks associated with applying CEOR process.