Home Schooling: A Brief Review

Martin A. Covey, Kim A. Covey
{"title":"Home Schooling: A Brief Review","authors":"Martin A. Covey, Kim A. Covey","doi":"10.3998/MFR.4919087.0006.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The influence of culture, society, politics and the market economy creates a more complicated and confusing environment in which families live and grow. Not the least among these influences is the plethora of options currently available to families for the education of children. The decision to send children to the local public school, to a neighborhood parochial school, or to an expensive private school has been expanded to include: charter schools, public schools of choice, schools for special needs students, private religious schools, and schooling at home.Home Schooling in AmericaThe education of children in America, from an historical perspective, has been characterized by Carper (2000) as \"educational pluralism\" (p. 9). From the earliest days of the settlement of the colonies, until approximately the mid-1800's, the education of children was the primary prerogative of parents. Education consisted mainly of learning to read the religious literature and learn the appropriate amounts of arithmetic in order for children to assume a vocation. Education of children occurred not only in homes, but in a wide variety of school situations that made the distinction between public and private education very difficult.By the middle of the eighteenth century, families had begun to turn many of their traditional responsibilities over to formal or public institutions. According to Mintz and Kellogg, as cited in Carper (2000, p. 11), by this time: \"... a variety of specialized institutions had begun to absorb traditional familial responsibility.... Free schools and common pay schools educated a growing number of the sons of artisans and skilled laborers\". During this transitional period, the demarcation between public and private education was vague.The public school movement gained momentum and support from the Protestant denominations of that day. Protestant broad support of public education was garnered by virtue of the similarities of belief and philosophy shared by religious and educational institutions. Carper (2000) observes that the differing belief systems of the Protestant denominations and the Roman Catholic Church eventually resulted in tax dollars being unavailable to Catholic schools. By the mid-nineteenth century the line between public and private education of children was well defined.Besides having the strong support of Protestant evangelicals, public schools in the mid-nineteenth century were very localized. The majority of children in public schools were from rural areas and attended the one-room country school. These schools were administrated and funded by local people, taught by local residents, and the children were often from only a few families. Home schools became a smaller part of the educational landscape because the public school was such an approximation of the rural family.As populations became increasingly urban at the beginning of the twentieth century, schools became less philosophically similar to Protestantism, broader in terms of its funding and leadership, diverse in.its teachers, and taught children from many more families. These influences gave the public education system characteristics of a developmental environment in and of itself, and increasingly dissimilar from the Protestant familial model. \"Once crusaders for the establishment of public education, conservative Protestants are now, ironically, among its most vociferous critics\" (Carper, 2000, p. 16).The disenchantment of Protestant evangelicals with the public education system has resulted in a renewed interest in education at home. In fact, Protestant evangelical families comprise the majority of home schools in America. In a recent study of 22,000 home school families, Protestant evangelicals comprised 70.3 percent of the respondent families (Rudner, 1998).Achievement of Home School StudentsThe above referenced study by Rudner (1998) analyzed test scores of home schooled students who were administered the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills and the Tests of Achievement and Proficiency. …","PeriodicalId":32430,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Family Review","volume":"82 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Family Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/MFR.4919087.0006.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The influence of culture, society, politics and the market economy creates a more complicated and confusing environment in which families live and grow. Not the least among these influences is the plethora of options currently available to families for the education of children. The decision to send children to the local public school, to a neighborhood parochial school, or to an expensive private school has been expanded to include: charter schools, public schools of choice, schools for special needs students, private religious schools, and schooling at home.Home Schooling in AmericaThe education of children in America, from an historical perspective, has been characterized by Carper (2000) as "educational pluralism" (p. 9). From the earliest days of the settlement of the colonies, until approximately the mid-1800's, the education of children was the primary prerogative of parents. Education consisted mainly of learning to read the religious literature and learn the appropriate amounts of arithmetic in order for children to assume a vocation. Education of children occurred not only in homes, but in a wide variety of school situations that made the distinction between public and private education very difficult.By the middle of the eighteenth century, families had begun to turn many of their traditional responsibilities over to formal or public institutions. According to Mintz and Kellogg, as cited in Carper (2000, p. 11), by this time: "... a variety of specialized institutions had begun to absorb traditional familial responsibility.... Free schools and common pay schools educated a growing number of the sons of artisans and skilled laborers". During this transitional period, the demarcation between public and private education was vague.The public school movement gained momentum and support from the Protestant denominations of that day. Protestant broad support of public education was garnered by virtue of the similarities of belief and philosophy shared by religious and educational institutions. Carper (2000) observes that the differing belief systems of the Protestant denominations and the Roman Catholic Church eventually resulted in tax dollars being unavailable to Catholic schools. By the mid-nineteenth century the line between public and private education of children was well defined.Besides having the strong support of Protestant evangelicals, public schools in the mid-nineteenth century were very localized. The majority of children in public schools were from rural areas and attended the one-room country school. These schools were administrated and funded by local people, taught by local residents, and the children were often from only a few families. Home schools became a smaller part of the educational landscape because the public school was such an approximation of the rural family.As populations became increasingly urban at the beginning of the twentieth century, schools became less philosophically similar to Protestantism, broader in terms of its funding and leadership, diverse in.its teachers, and taught children from many more families. These influences gave the public education system characteristics of a developmental environment in and of itself, and increasingly dissimilar from the Protestant familial model. "Once crusaders for the establishment of public education, conservative Protestants are now, ironically, among its most vociferous critics" (Carper, 2000, p. 16).The disenchantment of Protestant evangelicals with the public education system has resulted in a renewed interest in education at home. In fact, Protestant evangelical families comprise the majority of home schools in America. In a recent study of 22,000 home school families, Protestant evangelicals comprised 70.3 percent of the respondent families (Rudner, 1998).Achievement of Home School StudentsThe above referenced study by Rudner (1998) analyzed test scores of home schooled students who were administered the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills and the Tests of Achievement and Proficiency. …
家庭教育:简要回顾
文化、社会、政治和市场经济的影响使家庭生活和成长的环境更加复杂和混乱。在这些影响中,并非最不重要的是,目前家庭在子女教育方面有过多的选择。将孩子送到当地公立学校、社区教会学校或昂贵的私立学校的决定已经扩大到包括:特许学校、公立选择学校、特殊需要学生学校、私立宗教学校和在家上学。美国的家庭教育从历史的角度来看,美国的儿童教育被卡珀(2000)定性为“教育多元化”(第9页)。从殖民地定居的早期到大约19世纪中期,儿童的教育是父母的主要特权。教育主要包括学习阅读宗教文献和学习适当数量的算术,以便孩子们从事职业。儿童的教育不仅发生在家庭中,而且发生在各种各样的学校环境中,这使得区分公立教育和私立教育非常困难。到18世纪中叶,家庭已经开始将许多传统的责任转交给正式的或公共的机构。根据Mintz和Kellogg在Carper (2000, p. 11)中引用的说法,到这个时候:“……各种专门机构已经开始吸收传统的家庭责任....免费学校和公共付费学校教育了越来越多的工匠和熟练工人的儿子”。在这一过渡时期,公立教育与私立教育的界限模糊不清。公立学校运动得到了当时新教教派的大力支持。新教对公共教育的广泛支持是由于宗教和教育机构信仰和哲学的相似之处。Carper(2000)观察到新教教派和罗马天主教会的不同信仰体系最终导致天主教学校无法获得税收。到19世纪中期,公立和私立儿童教育之间的界限已经很明确了。除了得到新教福音派的大力支持外,19世纪中期的公立学校也非常本土化。公立学校的大多数孩子来自农村地区,上的是只有一间房的乡村学校。这些学校由当地人管理和资助,由当地居民授课,孩子们往往来自少数家庭。家庭学校在教育格局中所占的比例越来越小,因为公立学校非常接近农村家庭。20世纪初,随着人口越来越多地向城市发展,学校在哲学上与新教越来越不相似,在资金和领导方面更广泛,在。它的老师,并教了更多家庭的孩子。这些影响使公共教育系统本身具有发展环境的特点,与新教家庭模式越来越不同。“曾经是建立公共教育的十字军战士,具有讽刺意味的是,保守的新教徒现在是最大声的批评者之一”(卡珀,2000年,第16页)。新教福音派对公共教育系统的觉醒导致了对国内教育的新兴趣。事实上,新教福音派家庭占美国家庭学校的大多数。在最近对22,000个家庭学校家庭的研究中,新教福音派占被调查家庭的70.3% (Rudner, 1998)。以上引用的Rudner(1998)的研究分析了接受爱荷华基本技能测试和成就与熟练程度测试的家庭教育学生的测试成绩。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书