8 Cellular Senescence: A Link between Tumor Suppression and Organismal Aging?

J. Sedivy, U. Muñoz-Najar, Jessie C. Jeyapalan, J. Campisi
{"title":"8 Cellular Senescence: A Link between Tumor Suppression and Organismal Aging?","authors":"J. Sedivy, U. Muñoz-Najar, Jessie C. Jeyapalan, J. Campisi","doi":"10.1101/087969824.51.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aging of organisms occurs at virtually every level of complexity—from molecules to tissues to organ systems. Between these extremes are the basic units of life: individual cells. Among multicellular organisms, how do cells age? The deterioration of life processes in postmitotic cells—chronological aging—is explored elsewhere in this book. Here, we consider the aging of cells that retain the capacity for proliferation in adult organisms. Normal somatic cells of higher metazoans, with the exception of germ cells and some stem cells, have a limited proliferative capacity (also referred to as replicative life span). This phenomenon was first formally described by Hayflick and Moorhead (1961), who observed that human fibroblasts, upon explant into cell culture, displayed an initial phase of rapid proliferation followed by a period of declining replicative potential. Eventually, all cells in the culture ceased dividing, but they remained in a viable and stable state. This postmitotic growth arrest was termed replicative senescence (Hayflick 1965) and, later, cellular aging. The discovery of replicative senescence led to two important hypotheses. The first one proposed that cellular senescence recapitulates aspects of organismal aging and contributes to aging phenotypes in vivo (Hayflick 1985). Although there is mounting evidence to support this idea, it still rests largely on circumstantial evidence. The second hypothesis invoked cellular senescence as a mechanism that suppresses the development of cancer (Sager 1991). There is now substantial evidence to support this hypothesis (Campisi 2005; Hemann and Narita 2007). This chapter focuses on the links among cellular...","PeriodicalId":10493,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Archive","volume":"12 1","pages":"185-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Archive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/087969824.51.185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The aging of organisms occurs at virtually every level of complexity—from molecules to tissues to organ systems. Between these extremes are the basic units of life: individual cells. Among multicellular organisms, how do cells age? The deterioration of life processes in postmitotic cells—chronological aging—is explored elsewhere in this book. Here, we consider the aging of cells that retain the capacity for proliferation in adult organisms. Normal somatic cells of higher metazoans, with the exception of germ cells and some stem cells, have a limited proliferative capacity (also referred to as replicative life span). This phenomenon was first formally described by Hayflick and Moorhead (1961), who observed that human fibroblasts, upon explant into cell culture, displayed an initial phase of rapid proliferation followed by a period of declining replicative potential. Eventually, all cells in the culture ceased dividing, but they remained in a viable and stable state. This postmitotic growth arrest was termed replicative senescence (Hayflick 1965) and, later, cellular aging. The discovery of replicative senescence led to two important hypotheses. The first one proposed that cellular senescence recapitulates aspects of organismal aging and contributes to aging phenotypes in vivo (Hayflick 1985). Although there is mounting evidence to support this idea, it still rests largely on circumstantial evidence. The second hypothesis invoked cellular senescence as a mechanism that suppresses the development of cancer (Sager 1991). There is now substantial evidence to support this hypothesis (Campisi 2005; Hemann and Narita 2007). This chapter focuses on the links among cellular...
细胞衰老:肿瘤抑制与机体衰老之间的联系?
从分子到组织再到器官系统,生物体的衰老几乎发生在每一个复杂的层次上。在这两个极端之间的是生命的基本单位:单个细胞。在多细胞生物中,细胞是如何衰老的?有丝分裂后细胞生命过程的恶化——按时间顺序老化——在本书的其他地方进行了探讨。在这里,我们考虑在成年生物体中保留增殖能力的细胞的老化。高等后生动物的正常体细胞,除了生殖细胞和一些干细胞外,具有有限的增殖能力(也称为复制寿命)。Hayflick和Moorhead(1961)首先正式描述了这一现象,他们观察到人类成纤维细胞在外植入细胞培养后,表现出快速增殖的初始阶段,随后是一段繁殖潜力下降的时期。最终,培养的所有细胞都停止了分裂,但它们仍处于可存活和稳定的状态。这种分裂后生长停滞被称为复制性衰老(Hayflick 1965),后来被称为细胞衰老。复制性衰老的发现引出了两个重要的假设。第一个提出细胞衰老概括了机体衰老的各个方面,并有助于体内衰老表型(Hayflick 1985)。尽管有越来越多的证据支持这一观点,但它仍然主要依赖于间接证据。第二种假说认为细胞衰老是抑制癌症发展的机制(Sager 1991)。现在有大量证据支持这一假设(Campisi 2005;赫曼和成田2007)。本章的重点是蜂窝…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信